opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
23 Oct 2014
Canada Can Be Tough on Immigration

Two years ago, Jeffrey Niehaus was a popular teacher at the University of Victoria in British Columbia. An American,… Read More.

21 Oct 2014
'Death with Dignity' Law Is Least Slippery Slope

The story of Brittany Maynard has revived the debate over Oregon's Death with Dignity Act. The law lets … Read More.

16 Oct 2014
Why Millennials Don't Drive So Much

Young Americans are just not into driving the way their elders are or did at their age. They are less likely … Read More.

The Real Problem With Online Anonymity


Who is writing that brilliant, stupid, nasty, brave and/or dishonest online comment? We haven't a clue, because the author hasn't shared his or her name, hometown, gender, age and/or nationality. Or even worse, the author pretends to be another real person. Scammers, misfits, crooks, creeps, criminals and nice people all venture through cyberspace without identifying themselves. We can only guess what they're up to.

Web anonymity is often a force for evil in the civic conversation. There is the celebrated case of the blog known as "Gay Girl in Damascus." Followed by many and quoted by some journalists as an authority on events in Syria, the gay girl turned out to be a 40-year-old married American man writing from Scotland.

Some defenders of Web anonymity hold that not only was the Gay Girl blog not evil, it was a potential force for good. Maybe the author wasn't really a lesbian in Syria. The blog did help real gay men and lesbians by giving them a forum in a country where homosexuality is shunned or worse.

But did it? How could gay Syrians know that they were really communicating with other gay Syrians? A forum participant may have been a heterosexual teen in Dallas or a table of drunken friends in Seattle having fun at another's expense. "He" or "she" could have been a homophobic resident of Damascus, luring local gays into a dangerous trap.

Even cyber-sophisticates can play the chump. Consider this comment on a piece about online anonymity that appeared on the techie website Someone going under the name "David" discusses Cocoon, a web browser plugin that, its ads say, "protects online privacy." Then we read: "Full disclosure. I do work for them." Well, thanks for leveling with us, er, David.

Provocateurs can set up blogs purporting to support a political view with the intention of undermining it.

All they have to do is insert false statements that will turn off or utterly confuse certain readers. For example, one of the president's political foes might write, "Barack Hussein Obama is a good Muslim, and anyone who criticizes him for that is a bigot."

News organizations are beginning to demand that their online forum participants identify themselves. (That's why some have moved comments to Facebook.) But many cyber-libertarians resent any rules. They see an end of online anonymity as the dream of tyrants everywhere.

"Governments, in particular, absolutely loathe the idea that people can speak without being identified," media columnist Dan Gillmor wrote in The Guardian. He darkly warned, "I fear there will soon be widespread laws disallowing anonymous speech, even in America."

Gillmor can sleep soundly because the authorities ultimately can't control cyberspace — the arrest of several "Anonymous" hacking gang members notwithstanding. Of course, there are times when saying important things may physically endanger the speaker. Honest folks might fear being identified in discussions on sexually transmitted diseases. But online bullies often hide behind anonymity simply because they are cowards.

What are civic-minded people to do?

They can't censure online speech, nor should they try. But they can start teaching themselves and others what makes forum comments valuable. One mark is that the author is willing to stand behind his or her statements with that person's real name. Without a name, credibility is up in the air no matter how smart the comment sounds.

As for the sweaty mobs of posters going incognito as they drop poison on others, they are simply gutless. Forums should put a yellow stripe beside their words.

"Every scarecrow has a secret ambition to terrorize," the Polish poet Stanislaw Jerzy Lec wrote. And so what if he does?

To find out more about Froma Harrop, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at




3 Comments | Post Comment
Oh boo hoo. Wawawawa. I'm crying cause I don't know who called obama a muslim. Its terrible. Government should just run the internet and everything in it. Seriously, Froma's articles are becoming more and more pathetic.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:30 AM
"Gay Girl in Damascus." just hit foolish journalists right where they live, the land of comparison and quota. Just edgy enough to appeal to vapid tastes in search of the exotic flavor it promised, so the fools rushed in. Because Maher and Schultz and Olberman bring such high standards to the political commentary game I find this whine a little self-serving. " Look out, I'm a professional!" sort of thing. Most often, on these pages, it is the left that indulges in namecalling, and that audience is Froma's, so what does she really care? - after all namecalling is liberalese for "Amen".

Like "Glee", no one is forcing you to read it or watch it. Where have I heard that before over that past 40 years? Give me a loud "Amen", and don't forget that every scarecrow is an inaminate object, it has no ambition at all, metaphorical poetry aside. Froma can go under the name of "Bolger" and sing a chorus from "The Wizard of Oz" while conferrin' with the flowers, and so what if she does? I don't believe the authors read these comments, we just have a sort of cyber community going on here. No one is getting hurt, it is all in fun, and suddenly it is another thing liberals don't want us to do.

"...secret ambition to terrorize" Jeez.

Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:57 AM

The REAL problem liberals have with free speech

From: Jim Messina,
Subject: Expose the attacks
Date: September 13, 2011 7:56:35 PM EDT


If you're someone who cares about seeing a campaign focused on substance between now and November 2012, I need you to become a part of one of our most important teams.

It's called, and it launches today....

Obama's snitch line. Taking names and wishing to kick ...., there is your secret ambition to terrorize. Jeez.

Comment: #3
Posted by: Tom
Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:47 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Froma Harrop
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 27 Oct 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 25 Oct 2014
Ted Rall
Ted RallUpdated 24 Oct 2014

12 May 2011 The Naked and the Red: Republicans Exposed

30 Apr 2009 Man and His Self-Interest

16 Sep 2014 How Not to Get Your Country Back