I write a column similar to this one every January. But I don't mind plagiarizing myself, because it contains a very important message for people planning to retire in 2020.
January is a critical month for the hundreds of thousands of potential Social Security beneficiaries who are reaching 66, their so-called full retirement age, in 2020. The important message: All of them should at least consider the possibility of filing for their benefits this month, even though they may not be reaching their retirement age until later in the year.
Please note that if you want to delay filing for your Social Security benefits until 70 to get a 32% "delayed retirement credit" added to your monthly benefits, then you should forgo the procedure discussed in this column.
But if you are not interested in that strategy and plan to start your benefits at 66 in 2020, then, as I said, you may want to consider filing for benefits in January.
The reason for this early filing timeframe has to do with some quirky and complicated features of Social Security's earnings penalty provisions. Those provisions generally keep seniors who are still working off of Social Security's rolls until they reach that magic full retirement age.
The law essentially says if you are over 62 but under your full retirement age and still working full time, you are not eligible for Social Security. Specifically, the rules require that the SSA deduct $1 from any retirement benefits you might be due for every $2 you earn over $18,240 in 2020.
However, the rules say that once you reach your full retirement age, you are due full Social Security benefits even if you are still working and no matter how much money you are making.
Let's follow an example. Let's say Ed was born in July 1954, which means he'll reach his full retirement age of 66 in July 2020. And let's further say Ed generally makes about $80,000 per year, and he plans to continue working indefinitely. Based on the earnings penalty rules I briefly outlined above, Ed figures he must wait until July (his full retirement age) to begin collecting his Social Security benefits. As I said, at that magical point, the earnings penalty rules no longer apply, and he can get his Social Security. And prior to that, he's making way more than the $18,240 income threshold.
But here is why Ed should check into applying for Social Security in January. Congress set up a more lenient earnings threshold for the year you reach your full retirement age. Specifically, it says you can earn up to $48,600 between January and the month you reach your full retirement age and still get Social Security benefits. And even if you earn more than $48,600, you lose only $1 from your benefits for every $3 you exceed that threshold.
Ed is going to make $40,000 between January and June (i.e., before he reaches the magic age of 66). And that's under the $48,600 threshold for 2020, which means Ed is due benefits beginning in January. He does NOT have to wait until July to apply for his Social Security checks.
There is a bit of a catch. By starting his benefits in January, Ed will be accepting a slightly reduced amount. (Benefits are reduced roughly one-half of 1% for each month they are taken before full retirement age.)
If Ed's Social Security benefit at full retirement age is $2,500 per month, let's look at his options.
Ed's first option is to wait until July to start his Social Security benefits. He'll get $2,500 per month for six months, or $15,000 for the year 2020.
Ed's second option is to file for Social Security in January. Starting his benefits slightly early, his monthly rate is reduced to about $2,400. That comes out to $28,800 in total benefits for the year 2020. The downside to option two is his ongoing monthly benefit rate will be $100 less than what he would have been getting in option one. But because he'd be getting about $13,800 less in 2020 benefits in option one, it would take Ed a long time to make up that loss with his extra $100 per month in ongoing benefits. If I were Ed, I'd choose the second option.
Even if Ed was going to make more than the $48,600 income threshold between January and June, he only loses $1 in Social Security benefits for each $3 he exceeds that amount. So he probably still comes out ahead by filing in January.
Here is a quick example using that scenario. Let's say Ed will make $60,000 between January and June. That's $11,400 over the $48,600 limit. And one-third of that excess, or about $3,800, must be deducted from his 2020 benefits. But he would still get $25,000 in benefits for the year. That's still way better than the $15,000 he would be due by waiting until July to file for his Social Security.
Please note that this strategy might not work if you are earning far above the $48,600 limit — especially if you turn 66 much later in the year.
I know these rules are complicated and the math in the examples above might be difficult to follow. But my overall message is easy to follow: If you're reaching age 66 in 2020, talk to a Social Security representative sometime this month to find out if it's to your advantage to file for those benefits in January.
One word of caution: Many readers in the past told me that when they tried to file in January, Social Security Administration representatives told them they could not do so. Sadly, far too many SSA agents are unfamiliar with how these rules work. If you run into the same problem, ask to speak to a supervisor.
If you have a Social Security question, Tom Margenau has the answer. Contact him at [email protected] To find out more about Tom Margenau and to read past columns and see features from other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
Photo credit: nickgesell at Pixabay