creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
17 Feb 2012
The Santorum Surge

Could it really happen? Could Rick Santorum be the Republican nominee? Is God a Democrat? Not to be mean, but … Read More.

15 Feb 2012
That's What Friends Are For

Here we go again: a tragedy in the music world, a tragedy waiting to happen that did. Disturbing headlines … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
What Happened to Newt and Mitt?

Newt's easy. While all of us on the Democratic side were playing "root for Newt," Republicans were … Read More.

Is Anyone Ready?

Share Comment

The knives are out for my friend Bill Clinton. Again.

There he is in Rwanda, not one of the top spots for August vacations, trying to do something to stop a few million Africans from dying of curable diseases. Far as I can tell, no one wanted to discuss that, or at least report what he had to say about it.

No, it was his refusal to simply say "yes" when asked whether he thinks Barack Obama is ready to be president that resulted in one of the most viewed stories this week.

In fact, if you look at what he did say, it was almost certainly true. "You can argue that nobody is ready to be president," the former president told ABC News.

"You can argue that even if you've been vice president for eight years, that no one can be fully ready for the pressures of the office," Clinton said Monday from Rwanda.

You can argue it, for sure, and you'd be right, looking at history. But if you're Bill Clinton, apparently you're not supposed to say it. News reports quoted Clinton "backers" as saying the president couldn't give the politically correct answer because he's still smarting from his wife's loss. And that's what Clinton backers were saying. My e-mails from Obama backers cannot be printed.

What was Clinton doing?

Maybe he was just being honest.

Is anyone really ready on Day One to be president? Was Bill Clinton? I think he and Hillary would be the first to admit they made mistakes in the early days — think White House Travel Office and Billy Dale, not to mention that secret task force to come up with a national health insurance plan.

Was John Kennedy? Clearly not, or he wouldn't have gotten rolled, as it were, into approving the ill-fated Bay of Pigs invasion.

Was George W. Bush? The short answer is no, or he wouldn't have ignored that intelligence report about the possibility of al-Qaida hijacking airplanes or kept reading children's stories when he first heard the news.

The question is not whether you're ready, but whether you have what it takes to rise to the occasion.

On that score, President Clinton had nothing but praise for Obama: "He clearly can inspire and motivate people and energize them, which is a very important part of being president. And he's smart as a whip so there's nothing he can't learn."

What more do you want from the guy?

What the McCain camp wants, what conservatives want, what I fear the press wants as well, is the kind of fight between the Clintons and the Obamas that had all of us paying attention from January to June. Into every comment made by Bill or Hillary Clinton they will try to read a backhanded slap at Obama. They will report, as they did this week, on how few times the president has spoken with Obama since he clinched the nomination (once is what someone is saying), as if that is a measure of the former president's support for the Democratic nominee.

It might sell newspapers. It might give people something to talk about. But it doesn't put votes in Obama's column. It doesn't matter if it makes Bill Clinton look bad: He isn't running. Obama is. If Sen. Obama and President Clinton have only spoken once since early June, that is no reason for Obama supporters to be peeved, as they reportedly are.

There is an easy solution, literally at their fingertips. Bill Clinton is not going to refuse calls from Obama or his top aides. He will do whatever they ask. He will give whatever advice they are willing to hear. Nobody loves politics more. For all the failings of Hillary's campaign (how do you spell "no caucus strategy"), there is no one who understands winning presidential elections quite as well as the only Democrat since FDR to win two of them.

This should be simple. Obama and his supporters can try to make Bill Clinton look bad. They can try to keep him on the outs, whisper behind his back, point to his mistakes, attack both Clintons as if the primaries had never ended. Or they can try to get Obama elected president. It should be an easy choice.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
Thanks for your loyalty -
perhaps we all forget that politicians are human -
and no matter what they do or try to do they are subject
to appraisals most of us could not withstand......
the Clintons are ..married...parents...children...cousins - just like all of us..
I value your words and your steadfast decency.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Kurt Rae
Wed Aug 6, 2008 4:19 AM
Susan: Had Clinton doen anything the first time, he wouldn't have had to go back. Secondly, and I know this hurts: Hillary lost. Get over it.
Comment: #2
Posted by: keef
Wed Aug 6, 2008 6:44 AM
I'm disappointed that you still subscribe to the theory that President Bush should have jumped up from his reading and scared those little kids to death. Your friend, President Clinton, didn't read the tea leaves properly either while he was in office. The 90's were not a glorious period of time for our pursuit of terrorism. We had several
missed opportuinities to come down hard. Just as the terrorists tested Bill Clinton in the first towers attack and President Bush on 9/11 to see how we would respond I fear that the new president will also be tested. Had Mr. Clinton responded with adequate force then, there may not have been a need for 9/11.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Lillian Mitchell
Wed Aug 6, 2008 8:11 AM
Look, either Bill Clinton is the person who knows more about winning an American election than anyone else out there, or he's just an innocent who says what he thinks and can't fathom why those "Obama people" get so upset. He can't be both. He gave precisely the answer the GOP would have scripted for him. It sounded as if he *wanted* to speak well of Obama but his integrity just wouldn't allow him to say he was ready to lead the country. McCain must be dancing for joy.

Unless Clinton really is that innocent rube, then clearly he has an axe to grind with Obama. And, while it would be nice to think it's because of his love for his wife, his one "regret" from the campaign ("I am not a racist"...more of a grievance than a regret, really) makes it clear that it's all about him.

Clinton chose to compare Obama to Jesse Jackson after the South Carolina victory. Was it "racist"? Not really (and Obama didn't call him a racist). Did it use race to make a political appeal (i.e. "Don't give too much thought to the appealing black guy, because he'll turn out to be a novelty candidate in the end")? Absolutely, yes. And, in that, it was a bit of a low blow that could be expected to tick off Obama supporters and black voters generally, which it did.

You are friends with Bill, so you tell me, but he seems to be the kind of guy who wants to do and say whatever he likes and then have everyone not be mad at him. As the highest-ranking member of his political party, he damns the presumptive nominee of that party with faint praise, and nobody should think the less of him for it? Look, if Obama ticked Bill off to the point that he doesn't want to help a Democrat get elected this year, then OK. We'll all just have to live with that. But can Bill at least be honest about what he's up to?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Jen Daly
Wed Aug 6, 2008 11:02 AM
Susan, Explain in your next article why is Hillary asking to remain on the ballot at the convention. Who is trying to divide the party???? The Clintons do not want Obama to win because that will interfere with her drive to be President. I told my friends Hillary is not finish with this election when she suspended her candidacy and did not withdrawl. It looks like I am right.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Kathaleen McCausland
Thu Aug 7, 2008 5:32 AM
Ms. Estrich: In your position, you owe it to your readers to educate yourself on Pres. Bush's actions on the morning of 9/11/2001. I have spoken with the woman who was the Superintendent of Schools in that Florida school district. She recounted the whole story, from the selection of that school, several weeks before, through the preparations made by the Secret Service, through the events of that morning. While she has not published an account, to my knowledge, surely there were "journalists" there that morning, most of whom were privy to the "rest of the story" (where's Paul Harvey when we really need him). When all the facts are laid out, there is nothing to criticize Bush for. <> All the best.
Comment: #6
Posted by: davd w pennington
Thu Aug 7, 2008 5:39 AM
The Democrats are like a drunk out on the town who manages to pick up a beautiful woman, then wakes in the morning to find that she's a not-so-beautiful he. The Party has one last chance at their convention to recover from that night of debauchery by selecting Hillary Clinton as their nominee. She could be nominated from the floor, and her committed delegates plus a few more who have sobered up could get it done.
I'm not going to vote for Obama or Clinton, in any case. I've almost always voted for the Democratic candidate for president (7 of 9 elections), but I won't do it this year. I'll go with McCain.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Kapmep
Thu Aug 7, 2008 5:44 AM
Bill Clinton-passive aggressive. He can't help it. And he can't help Obama, and he couldn't help Hilary.
Comment: #8
Posted by: liz
Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:14 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

11 Jul 2008 The Evil Eye

18 May 2007 Barack In Black And White

25 Apr 2007 About Alec Baldwin