opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Scott Rasmussen
Scott Rasmussen
14 Nov 2014
The Fate of the President's Health Care Law

In the wake of the midterm elections, many are now speculating about what will happen to President Obama's … Read More.

7 Nov 2014
Republican Gains Deep and Wide

Little noticed by the Washington press corps is the extent of the Republican State legislative gains in … Read More.

31 Oct 2014
Election 2014 in Context

Political pundits often miss the forest for the trees, and it's amazing how things look when you pause for a … Read More.

The Goal of Our Political Process is Not to Create a Government That Works


The New York Times recently ran an op-ed column calling for the end of midterm elections. Since the column was posted on the eve of a midterm election leading to record Republican gains, many readers presumably just rolled their eyes and chalked it up to the Times being opposed to anything that helps Republicans.

There is probably some truth to that. If the Republicans win the White House in 2016, the Times will likely find substantial merit in the 2018 midterms.

But there is more to the story than just partisan cheerleading. The Times column, written by David Schanzer, a Duke University professor, and Jay Sullivan, a Duke student, contains a dark undercurrent of desire to free those in power from accountability to voters. "In the modern age," they write, "we do not need an election every two years to communicate voters' desires to their elected officials."

That is technically true. Elected officials can find out the desires of voters, but that doesn't mean they act upon them. Getting politicians to respond to voters requires elections. Even in an age where incumbents routinely get re-elected, the fear of being rejected by voters can have a powerful impact on the legislative process.

In fairness to Schanzer and Sullivan, they frame their objective as a desire to make government work better. They worry about the fact that midterms tend to "weaken" presidents and "cripple" their agendas.

To fix this perceived problem, they advocate having all federal officials on the ballot at the same time. Let the people elect Senators and Representatives only when there is a presidential election.

With such a system, those elected would have four years to develop their theories and projects without interference from the voters. That's a reasonable approach if your goal is to have a more energetic and efficient government.

However, it misses the larger point. The purpose of our political process is not to create a government that works. It is to create a society that works.

Those are two very different objectives.

A government that works well can be dangerous to society if it's run by ambitious men and women seeking to use it for their own purposes.

That's why our government was established with a careful system of checks and balances. Today, many are frustrated when the House and Senate can't agree on what some see as common sense legislation. While frustrating, that's the way the process is supposed to work. As James Madison put it, "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition."

The fact that Representatives are elected for two-year terms, presidents for four years and senators for six is a wonderful feature of our electoral process, rather than something to be fixed. It limits the amount of change that can be brought about by the passing passions of the moment in any individual election. It makes it harder for ambitious and ideological politicians to overwhelm the common sense wisdom of the American people.

Our system of checks and balances is not perfect. But the problem is not that it places too many limits on politicians. It's that presidents and other politicians have found too many loopholes to escape the appropriate limits on their power.

To find out more about Scott Rasmussen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit




0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Scott Rasmussen
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 26 Nov 2014
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 26 Nov 2014
Brent Bozell

22 Aug 2014 Ferguson Shows Need to Appreciate Multiple Perspectives

9 Aug 2013 2016 Will Not Feature Christie vs. Clinton

2 Nov 2012 An Unpredictable End to a Very Predictable Election