creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
10 May 2013
Mother Love

My daughter was born on Mother's Day, 23 years ago. It was the happiest day of my life — matched only, … Read More.

8 May 2013
The Drunk Guy in the Parking Lot

The report from the Arlington, Va., Police Department is, on its face, hardly newsworthy: "SEXUAL BATTERY,… Read More.

3 May 2013
Mary Thom, Thank You

Mary Thom, former editor of Ms. magazine and feminist visionary, died last week in a motorcycle accident. I … Read More.

Hitting Home

Comment

I'm from Boston. Over the years, I lived in two apartments within a stone's throw of Monday's bombings. Over the years, I stood and cheered marathon runners countless times. I know every square inch of the area in all the pictures, which is hardly unusual. It's the center of Boston. My nephew was around the corner when the explosions went off.

This week's terror hit home for me.

And what to do? That is always the question.

Do you stop going to sporting events? Cultural events? Outdoor rallies?

I was raped around the corner from where the bombs hit. I did not stop going out, didn't quit my job working nights as a bartender. (I was raped during the day, anyway.) I was determined not to let the crazies run my life. I was younger then.

An even harder question: What do we want the government to do?

How much of our liberty and privacy are we willing to give up in the hopes that it might stop terror?

My answer to that now is also different from what it would have been in the days when I lived around the corner from the bombings. Maybe it's because I'm older. Maybe it's because I'm a mother. Or maybe, probably mostly, it's because of the horrors we have seen. The two planes that crashed into the World Trade Center on 9/11 took off that morning from Boston (my old home) en route to Los Angeles (my current home). Until my children were born, I commuted on those flights from Boston to LA.

So this is my answer: I'd give up a lot. You want to put cameras on every corner? Fine with me. I don't care who pats me down at the airport. Pat away. Keep the confidences of my clients, but otherwise, my email is an open book. Mine my data; listen to my conversations. If it will keep my children safe, I don't care.

But of course, that's not the question, either. I'm a middle-aged, well-dressed (mostly), respectable-looking white woman. No one is really interested in me, terrorism-wise.

So when I ask myself or my students how much liberty we're willing to give up, I'm not really asking about us.

I'm asking about "others" — and we all know which others I mean. As I write this, Monday night, I would not want to be a Muslim going through security at Logan Airport. Just for instance. And I don't blame the TSA if they pay more careful attention. I just want the planes to take off and land.

I ask my students: If there are two security lines at the airport, and one has three white businessmen about to whisk off their jackets, and the other has three Muslim men, which line do you join? I know what I would do. Is that racist? Are we?

As I write this, we don't know who planted the bombs that tore off limbs, took innocent lives, disrupted a race that celebrates "Patriots Day" every year, a race where this year the 26th mile was dedicated to the 26 who died in Newtown. But the media are reporting that a Saudi student was being questioned after the bombings because of his proximity, the nature of his injuries and, yes, his nationality. Racist?

How do you avoid being a racist when you're afraid?

How do you avoid offering up your privacy and liberty — or, more likely, someone else's — when you are terrified of terror?

How do you maintain a free society when you see limbs flying?

It's true these events are rare. It's true that, compared to other countries, we are indeed remarkably free and safe. And perhaps we also are spoiled to believe that in this day and age we can have it all: freedom and safety, privacy and security, not to mention equality.

When I was a kid, we worried about the Russians. We practiced going to the basement of the school in case of a nuclear attack. How odd to see those as less terrifying days — and to long for them.

I hope the Saudi man had nothing to do with it. I hope the culprits, when they are found, will not add to our collective terror of "others." I hope this will not be a case that makes us even more afraid of those who are different from us, even though 99.9 percent of them mean us no harm. I hope.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

20 Comments | Post Comment
Or said another way never let a "good crisis" go to waste in order to curtail someone else's freedoms.

I would wholly object my email being an open book, my data being mined or my conversations listened to.

Further Estrich says "I hope the Saudi man had nothing to do with it. I hope the culprits, when they are found, will not add to our collective terror of "others." I hope this will not be a case that makes us even more afraid of those who are different from us, even though 99.9 percent of them mean us no harm. I hope."

Why one asks would Estrich wish that the culprit had not been caught? Clearly if innocent then the Saudi should be released but why would Estrich prefer the trail to be going cold? She says, "when they are found" But as the trial grows colder and colder it becomes if they are found.

One can only understand that Estrich hopes it was not an Islamist that perpetrated the outrage but rather some domestic nutcase American, someone angry at our dear leader on tax day or preferably for her a tea party member.

The left never changes. It is constantly looking and hoping for political advantage in the midst of outrage.

Wonder if she would be so hopeful or satisfied if it turned out to be a protégé of Ayres and Dorn et al, those domestic terrorists and killers with whom dear leader is so very close.

But always remember Islam is a religion of peace whose adherents wish us no harm.... we know because the Islamists and their apologists and barry boy told us so.........riiiight !
Comment: #1
Posted by: joseph wright
Tue Apr 16, 2013 4:11 PM
Joseph Wright is right.

Also, if Republicans are as dishonorable as Democrats and Obama, Republicans will be collecting the family members of the victims of the Boston bombing and using their tragedy to advance a Republican agenda.

Obama is parading the Newtown family members around like a trump card and using the massacre of children to advance the political agenda of the left. Could there be a more despicable group of people than Obama and his minions? There could be but they are probably in hell.

Obama and people like Susan will respond that the use of the massacre of children to advance a political agenda, while bad, is a necessary evil as the ends justify the means. Here is the problem with such logic.

Everyone wants to live in a perfect society. The problem is the perfect society can never be obtained. Still it is import to try as the effort yields its own rewards (as long as the effort is moral). Thus, as long as one is honorable, there is still value in trying to achieve the unachievable.
Stated differently, for those who believe “the ends justify the means”, when the “ends” of a goal cannot be achieved, the “means” becomes the “ends”.

Thus, if one attempts to create the perfect society using evil means, one becomes evil.
Such pretty much sums up Democrats and Liberals.
Comment: #2
Posted by: SusansMirror
Tue Apr 16, 2013 6:50 PM
Instructions to make bombs out of pressure cookers similar to those believed the source of two explosions in Boston on Monday were published two years ago in Inspire, an
online magazine tied to al-Qaeda and the late U.S.-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, an analysis of the magazine shows.
The article, "How to Make a Bomb in the Kitchen of Your Mom," by "the AQ Chef" instructed would-be bombers to glue shrapnel to the inside of a pressure cooker and then "fill in the cooker with the inflammable material."
Would-be bombers, the article said, should use gloves to prevent their fingerprints from
being found on the bomb fragments and to "put you [sic] faith in Allah and pray for the success of your operation."
The summer 2010 issue of Inspire featured several articles on what it called "the open-source Jihad," which instructed readers on how to make their own terrorist materials.
Awlaki, the magazine's founder, was killed in a U.S. drone strike in Yemen in 2011
Comment: #3
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:09 AM
Only liberals like Susan believe you can legislate to eliminate evil. They don't even want to recognize it when it exists but they use evil events to promote their utopian goals!
A great way to combat evil is to bring God back into our country; He has been absent for some time now.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Oldtimer
Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:58 AM
Ms. Estrich wrote:
"I hope the Saudi man had nothing to do with it. I hope the culprits, when they are found, will not add to our collective terror of "others." I hope this will not be a case that makes us even more afraid of those who are different from us, even though 99.9 percent of them mean us no harm. I hope."

I understand your sentiment, but I don't completely agree with it.

Humans are wired to find patterns in our environment and react to them. In fact, we are so good at it that we tend to find far more patterns than are actually there. Mother Nature built us this way because she would rather have us react to a non-existent tiger in the bushes 99.9% of the time than ignore the real tiger the 0.1% of the time it is present.

So pattern recognition and reaction is a human survival characteristic. That doesn't mean it doesn't have some drawbacks. The tendency for humans to create/believe in grand conspiracy theories is a direct result of our overabundant pattern finding skills. It also leads to people being uncomfortable around individuals from groups that are perceived as a potential threat. This is natural and to some degree unavoidable. However, we normally temper our reactions through the use of logic. We are on our guard, but we don't over react.

That having been said, we most likely will get to the bottom of the recent bombings and determine who the culprits are and what their motivations were (i.e., We will know the truth, and truth will make us free). Whatever pattern we find, it will be another tool in our survival kit. How we react/use that knowledge is up to us. Over reaction may be bad, but completely ignoring what we have learned and hoping it will go away is likely to be more harmful in the long run.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Old Navy
Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:09 AM
Re: SusansMirror
For Democrats, liberals, fascists (they are one and the same) the end, no matter what the end, justifies the means, no matter what the means. All evil is ignored so long as the perpetrator had "good intentions". Good intentions that is in the mind of fascists, not necessarily good in the moral sense.

Re: Post Script to my earlier comment.

David Sirota, writes in Salon, like Estrich, expressing hopes that the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American. I note here, that neither Estrich nor Sirota actually expressed any hope that there would be no more bombings.

Sirota writes " ...if you care about everything, from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope that the bomber was a white domestic terrorist. Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues."

This is the group think of the left. This is how the scum of the left reasons, all as demonstrated by Sirota and Estrich.

Rather than being outraged that an attack has taken place on innocents, rather than be outraged that an attack has taken place on America, the left immediately calculates how this outrage can be prevented from derailing immigration reform, from derailing the left's desire to cut defense budgets in order to leave America defenseless, from derailing its objective of gun confiscation, from derailing efforts to fund the leftist/Islamist coalition particularly with the Muslim Brotherhood currently being led by barry boy and his minions.

This much is sure, if the culprit is NOT a white male American (and preferably a Tea Party member) then do not look to the culprit ever being exposed.

If the culprit is Islamist, then just as with the Benghazi outrage, this Admin will prevent truth from appearing for the reasons stated by Sirota.

The longer the culprit remains unidentified the more certain it becomes that the culprit is not a white American. That however will not prevent the Admin and its propaganda wing from insinuating it to be so.

On a side note, barry boy flies in to Boston today, thereby becoming directly connected. That being so, the only person presently known to be directly connected with the Boston outrage and also directly with known domestic terrorists and killers is barry boy.

But always remember Islam is a religion of peace whose adherents wish us no harm.... we know that because the Islamists and their apologists and barry boy told us so.........riiiight !
Comment: #6
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:59 AM
I have just read all of the above posts. I am amazed that not one of them contains any comment of concern for the actual victims but instead only contain attempts to score some sort of political point. How very sad that it is this same disregard for human life and humanity that is similar to the mentality of whoever perpetrated that awful act of terrorism. I have a friend who has run in the Boston Marathon for more than forty years off and on. This was one of his on years. He finished the race just minutes before the blast. Bobby had a habit of finishing the race and then immediately doing 50 push-ups. The Boston Globe photographers often caught him doing the push-ups and he is sort of a celebrity. Now many others imitate him. He is flesh and blood. Those who were maimed and killed were flesh and blood. My heart goes out to all of those who were injured in this horrific blast. My prayers are for their speedy recovery and for those who lost limbs, I pray for their total rehab. To the families of those who lost loved ones, my prayers are with them in their loss. One thing is certain. We will track down the responsible parties. It will take time, but I trust our FBI and law enforcement agencies will do a complete job and find all who were involved. I do not expect this to happen overnight.
Comment: #7
Posted by: robert lipka
Wed Apr 17, 2013 6:24 AM
Re: robert lipka

It seems that your comment is restricted to those responding to Estrich. That being so, it seems that you are not outwardly amazed that there is no expression of concern for the victims in Estrich's column or in the piece in Salon. You seem not to be amazed that Estrich and her ilk and all in this Adin have used, use and will continue to use people, victims and suffering as pawns and props for their leftist agenda.

Save your assertion that " this same disregard for human life and humanity is similar to the mentality of whoever perpetrated that awful act of terrorism" for those endeavoring to profit from it, to wit, the left and it's fellow travelers, who were called out on that mentality in the above posts.

Whether wittingly or not you make the point for us as to the inhumanity of the left.
Comment: #8
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:14 AM
Lipka -
Your post also applies to article. Right?
Also, I don't expect the current government to find the culprits overnight either, just like Bengazi.
P.S. We have been too busy praying for the victims to spend time finding ways to spend more money to prevent evil.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Oldtimer
Wed Apr 17, 2013 8:20 AM
JW stated:
"The longer the culprit remains unidentified the more certain it becomes that the culprit is not a white American. That however will not prevent the Admin and its propaganda wing from insinuating it to be so."

Utter bilge water. The Unabomber started his streak in 1978 and wasn't caught until 1996 (N.B., And even then he was only arrested because his brother turned him in). What ethnicity did he turn out to be? Catching the culprit could take a while, regardless of his ethnicity.

Lipka stated:
"I have just read all of the above posts. I am amazed that not one of them contains any comment of concern for the actual victims but instead only contain attempts to score some sort of political point."

Most people wouldn't feel the need to state something as obvious as a concern for the victims. Especially as part of a response to a blog addressing the fear generated by the bombing and its potential effects on the public's view of various ethnic groups.

Let me assure you that I do feel for the victims of the attack. Further let me assure you that the sky is still blue and dropped objects still fall downward up here in New England. Are there any other obvious things I have failed to address? I'm not very PC so I may have missed a few.
Comment: #10
Posted by: Old Navy
Wed Apr 17, 2013 9:24 AM
Re: Old Navy

And what relevance is catching the Unabomber to the attack in Boston? Correct answer is None?

Matters have changed dramatically since 1996. Surveillance, intelligence gathering, etc etc are all much more sophisticated.

But more importantly, the other difference is that today we are governed by an Administration whose anti America, anti Constitution, pro Islamic caliphate in the Middle East objectives would be detrimentally affected if the perpetrator turns out to be Islamist. This Admin has nothing to gain if the perp is Islamist and so identification of an Islamist will go on the back burner.

I repeat the longer a perp is not identified then the less likelihood it is that the perp is a white male domestic nutcase.

The quicker the perp is identified the more likely it is a white domestic male.

And if it is, then sit back and watch the left and this Admin ramp up the rhetoric and the politicizing in order to attack conservatism, the Second Amendment and freedom in general.
Comment: #11
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Apr 17, 2013 11:02 AM
JW wrote:
"Matters have changed dramatically since 1996. Surveillance, intelligence gathering, etc etc are all much more sophisticated."

Of course! What was I thinking? This explains why so few crimes have gone unsolved in recent years. This would explain why the national clearance rates for murder and manslaughter has fallen from about 90 percent in the 1960s to below 65 percent in recent years. Yes, things are really different.

JW also wrote:
"But more importantly, the other difference is that today we are governed by an Administration whose anti America, anti Constitution, pro Islamic caliphate in the Middle East objectives would be detrimentally affected if the perpetrator turns out to be Islamist. This Admin has nothing to gain if the perp is Islamist..."

Why didn't I see this before? This would explain all those killings by US drones in the Mideast. It even fits in with the killing of Bin Laden and all those other 'pro-caliphate' leaders of Al-Qaeda...

And of course, the administrations "big government is good" agenda would suffer immensely if the government was made to look efficient and worthwhile by a quick arrest in this case. I'm sure Obama's popularity numbers would soar if this bomber killed a few more people in follow-on attacks. My word, the dear leader really is diabolical! Such byzantine machinations! Conservatives don't have a chance against this kind of central planning.

Lastly, JW wrote:
"...the longer a perp is not identified then the less likelihood it is that the perp is a white male domestic nutcase".

Yes! This clear bias goes a long way toward explaining the racial makeup of the inmates in US prisons.

Seriously, I hope for a quick arrest. This nutcase needs to be removed from the streets before he kills again. However, I'm not sanguine that an arrest is imminent. This is going to take a lot of patient police work. Pray the 'perp' gets careless like Timothy McVeigh.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Old Navy
Wed Apr 17, 2013 2:27 PM
Re: Old Navy
Why have you not seen before? Easy there are none so blind as those who will not see . You fit right into that category. Perhaps you have chosen not to see or to take due cognizance of the members of the Muslim Brotherhood who are either part of this unholy Adin or are close to it or who directly influence it. Perhaps you have not seen or refuse to take cognizance of the billions of dollars Barry boy is sending to the caliphate seeking Islamists in Egypt every dollar of which will be used against American Interests. Perhaps you have not seen or have refused to take cognizance of the left's in general and obama's in particular hatred of Isreal.Perhaps you have not seen or refuse to take cognizance of the anti American alliance between the left and the Islamists. Only you know why you refuse to see what is in plain view. And only you know why you endeavor to persuade otherwise.
Comment: #13
Posted by: joseph wright
Wed Apr 17, 2013 3:40 PM
Re: JW

I never attribute to an all encompassing, malevolent, conspiracy that which I can attribute to simple naivete and foolishness. Perhaps someone high in the government is a rank amateur and exhibits these simple traits?
Comment: #14
Posted by: Old Navy
Wed Apr 17, 2013 5:58 PM
Re: Old Navy

And it is precisely for that reason that i hold no animus for you and never suggest that you are part of a malelovent conspiracy.
Comment: #15
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:54 AM
Have you forgotten that President Obama's political career was luanched in the living room of terroist bomber? That is wife a terrorist bomber, and her good friend is a terrorist cop killer who is now an adjunct professor at Columbia? How can we claim we will do everthing possible to deter and prevent terrorism when some of them have extraordinary access to the White House, and play influential roles in some legal and higher education circles? Who knows, the people who set off these bombs, with the right defense lawyers, may some day be on the staff of Boston University.
Comment: #16
Posted by: Max Bouknecht
Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:25 AM
It is being reported this morning ( infowars.com and Drudge) that the Saudi "person of interest" in the Boston Marathon bombing is being deported from the US on "national security'" grounds and that this follows upon an unscheduled meeting between barry and the Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Saud-al-Faisal.

Shades of Benghazi ? Shades of cover up? Conspiracy theory ? Naivete and foolishness? True ? Who knows?

But I know, absent evidence to the contrary, just what I am prepared for the present to believe.
Comment: #17
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:33 AM
Reports now say that the Saudi "person of interest" will indeed be deported, after Obama's unscheduled meeting with the Saudi Foreign Minister, perhaps today, on grounds of national security and that the deportation papers have been designated classified. Seems this Saudi person of interest has 'connections" at high level.

Do not expect main stream media coverage!

But nothing to see here. Riiiight !


What say you now Old Navy?
Comment: #18
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Apr 18, 2013 7:36 AM
The FBI has finally put out the photographs of the two punks who delivered the bombs to the blast site. I do not assume that these are the only people involved or that they were the ones who assembled the bombs. This investigation is only just beginning. Jumping to conclusions as to who is involved could throw us off the trail of the rest of the conspirators. The fact that two people at least are involved makes this a conspiracy for federal legal purposes and thus this is a Federal crime and not just a state murder charge. Massachusetts does not have the death penalty so it is important that this crime is Federalized. The three beautiful victims of this crime deserve convictions and the possibility of death sentences for those murders. All of the other victims who were maimed, deserve justice as well. My prayers are with all those who were harmed by the horrifiying act. Flesh and Blood, Flesh and blood
Comment: #19
Posted by: robert lipka
Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:59 PM
Re: robert lipka
They're Islamic Terrorists! How can that be? We killed BinLaden!
Comment: #20
Posted by: Oldtimer
Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:56 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 14 May 2013
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 13 May 2013
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 11 May 2013

12 Mar 2008 What I Couldn't Teach Eliot Spitzer at Harvard Law School

21 Jan 2009 Teddy

5 Nov 2010 Nancy Pelosi, Superhero