creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
David Sirota
David Sirota
10 May 2013
The Military's 40-Year Experiment

Few probably recall the name Dwight Elliott Stone. But even if that name has faded from the national memory, … Read More.

3 May 2013
The Real Obstacle to Halting Climate Change

In case you missed the news, humanity just spent the Earth Day week reaching another sad milestone in the … Read More.

26 Apr 2013
A Cronkite Moment for the Blowback Era

"The stuff we have done overseas is now brought back into our own front yards. America's chickens are … Read More.

Is America Too Corrupt To Keep Up?

Comment

A sovereign nation investing its wealth in its domestic economy seems like a no-brainer, especially during a global recession. But in this crazy age of American politics, even that has become a controversial notion.

This is the subtext of a dispute that simmered beneath the pomp and circumstance of this week's U.S.-China summit. As The New York Times previously reported, the Obama administration is calling on the World Trade Organization to use its power to halt the Chinese government's wind-energy fund specifically because the money is "contingent on ... manufacturers using parts made in China rather than foreign-made components." The program, along with the Chinese regime's broader domestic procurement requirements for wind farms, have helped the Chinese wind industry capture almost half of the global market for turbines.

Setting aside the bilateral wrangling over WTO arcana, China's industrial policy success carries a basic lesson: When a nation couples public spending with incentives that encourage domestic corporate investment, an economy tends to grow its own wealth-building industries. That's simple enough to understand, right?

Evidently, not within our own government. As "Buy China" policies now economically supercharge the world's most populous nation, the White House and congressional Republicans have opposed many of the very "Buy America" proposals that might help us keep up — and that obstruction has come at a steep price.

Remember, Businessweek in 2008 warned that in an America with few domestic purchasing mandates, any economic stimulus — whether spending or tax cuts — would likely "leak" abroad, thus "reducing its impact on jobs here." When congressional Democrats responded in 2009 by trying to expand the meager "Buy America" regulations still on the books from the Great Depression, President Obama opposed the effort. He argued that targeting stimulus dollars at domestic investment would "send a protectionist message."

Following his salvo, Congress blocked the initiative and — big shocker! — a year later, ABC News was reporting that between 54 percent and 79 percent of the money in the stimulus bill's key wind energy program had been spent overseas.

How could this happen? In a country of "USA!"-chanting sports crowds, flag-waving rallies and saber-rattling political rhetoric, why haven't our lawmakers passed muscular "Buy America" statutes that might compete with the "Buy China" policies?

Not surprisingly, it all goes back to the principle that patriotism may play well with voters on the campaign trail, but corporate cash ultimately rules the day in our nation's capital.

As Bloomberg News reported during the stimulus negotiations, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce fiercely lobbied against the "Buy America" provisions when Congress debated them, just as the group lobbies against similar proposals today. That may seem strange coming from an organization whose name pays homage to this country. But don't be fooled: The chamber is a front group for huge multinational firms whose first priority is not this nation's economy, but a profit-maximizing business model based on exporting jobs and production facilities to low-wage countries abroad. Those firms, of course, make massive campaign contributions to both parties and such donations come with the expectation of legislative favors — like, say, killing initiatives to strengthen "Buy America" laws.

Thus, our current position of humiliating weakness. Here we are, supposedly the world's most powerful country, begging the WTO to intervene on our behalf so as to prevent an economic competitor from making basic investments in its own economy. And we're doing this all because our political system is too corrupt to permit a similarly competitive posture here at home.

Considering that sad reality, when Americans see the next wave of bad unemployment news and mass layoffs and want to know who is responsible, we shouldn't shake our fists at communists in Beijing; we should look directly at our own leaders in Washington.

David Sirota is a best-selling author whose upcoming book "Back to Our Future" will be released in March of 2011. He hosts the morning show on AM760 in Colorado. E-mail him at ds@davidsirota.com, follow him on Twitter @davidsirota or visit his website at www.davidsirota.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Those with something to sell always search for a nifty phrase. When I lived in Arizona Janet Napolitano -yes, that one, - was Governor. She took a little junket to Ireland and came back talking about the "Irish Model" for economic growth; a partnership between industry and government. Oh my, the journalists who went along on the junket were in a sweat to tell us all they had learned. It was in the Arizona Republic every day and five times on Sunday for about two weeks. Pretty good attentions span for politicians and jouralists. Then the model dropped from sight and was never heard from again. Ireland is now one of the PIGS. Japan was such a model in the 70's and 80's, it tanked I guess in the 90's and has never come to full boil since. But they get along and are doing okay.

I don't really think the government shouild be trying to pick winners and losers in the game of capitalism because they are not playing with their own money. Let private investora do that. Government prefers to rig the game to suit government interests. The TARP stimulus was merely a bag of goodies presented to favored businesses. How did GE suddenly qualify as a bank?

Let's try the "American Model" if we can find any pieces of it laying around. It worked for the better part of 200 years. It's the one where Government doesn't really care what light bulbs we use. I've been to China, and it is like stepping back 150 years. Journalists and Governors don't see that reality from the posh Potemkin City view they are provided. We should shake out fists at Washington, but not for the reasons Sirota offers.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Sat Jan 22, 2011 3:07 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Sirota
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013
Robert Scheer
Robert ScheerUpdated 14 May 2013

25 Jul 2008 Six Little Words

6 Jan 2012 Commemorating Our Soon-to-Be Lost Vernacular

1 Feb 2008 Rocky Mountain Realities