Law vs. Moral Values
A civilized society's first line of defense is not the law, police and courts but customs, traditions and moral values. Behavioral norms, mostly transmitted by example, word of mouth and religious teachings, represent a body of wisdom distilled over the ages through experience and trial and error. They include important thou-shalt-nots such as shalt not murder, shalt not steal, shalt not lie and cheat, but they also include all those courtesies one might call ladylike and gentlemanly conduct. The failure to fully transmit values and traditions to subsequent generations represents one of the failings of the so-called greatest generation.
Behavior accepted as the norm today would have been seen as despicable yesteryear. There are television debt relief advertisements that promise to help debtors to pay back only half of what they owe. Foul language is spoken by children in front of and sometimes to teachers and other adults. When I was a youngster, it was unthinkable to use foul language to an adult; it would have meant a smack across the face. Back then, parents and teachers didn't have child-raising "experts" to tell them that "time out" is a means of discipline. Baby showers are held for unwed mothers. Yesteryear, such an acceptance of illegitimacy would have been unthinkable.
To see men sitting whilst a woman or elderly person was standing on a crowded bus or trolley car used to be unthinkable. It was common decency for a man to give up his seat. Today, in some cities there are ordinances requiring public conveyances to set aside seats posted "Senior Citizen Seating." Laws have replaced common decency. Years ago, a young lady who allowed a guy to have his hand in her rear pocket as they strolled down the street would have been seen as a slut. Children addressing adults by first names was unacceptable.
You might be tempted to charge, "Williams, you're a prude!" I'd ask you whether high rates of illegitimacy make a positive contribution to a civilized society. If not, how would you propose that illegitimacy be controlled? In years past, it was controlled through social sanctions like disgrace and shunning. Is foul language to or in the presence of teachers conducive to an atmosphere of discipline and respect necessary for effective education? If not, how would you propose it be controlled? Years ago, simply sassing a teacher would have meant a trip to the vice principal's office for an attitude adjustment administered with a paddle. Years ago, the lowest of lowdown men would not say the kind of things often said to or in front of women today. Gentlemanly behavior protected women from coarse behavior. Today, we expect sexual harassment laws to restrain coarse behavior.
During the 1940s, my family lived in North Philadelphia's Richard Allen housing project. Many families didn't lock doors until late at night, if ever. No one ever thought of installing bars on their windows. Hot, humid summer nights found many people sleeping outside on balconies or lawn chairs. Starting in the '60s and '70s, doing the same in some neighborhoods would have been tantamount to committing suicide. Keep in mind that the 1940s and '50s were a time of gross racial discrimination, high black poverty and few opportunities compared to today. The fact that black neighborhoods were far more civilized at that time should give pause to the excuses of today that blames today's pathology on poverty and discrimination.
Policemen and laws can never replace customs, traditions and moral values as a means for regulating human behavior. At best, the police and criminal justice system are the last desperate line of defense for a civilized society. Our increased reliance on laws to regulate behavior is a measure of how uncivilized we've become.
Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


|
 |
Comments
|
5 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
"The failure to fully transmit values and traditions to subsequent generations represents one of the failings of the so-called greatest generation."
You are so right Walter. Since the basis for all law and moral codes is the fact that we humans are not (as the Godless left claims) just another animal, but higher beings (made in God's image) we therefore have responsiblities to behave in certain fashions and care for each other. Without God, there is simply no reason for man to do good -in fact, without God and a hereafter, he must reduce himself to mere animal and take what he can from others whenever and wherever, and however, he can get away with it. If you take a look around at what Godless liberalism has wrought upon this wayward nation, you'll see exactly that.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Don L
Wed Apr 29, 2009 4:00 AM
|
|
|
|
Sir;... You might do well to read a good history of Western Law, such as Law and Revolution, by Berman... If you did, you would find that we have only had law in its present form for about a thousand years, and in that time law has served to break down communities wherever it has spread... And Law has also given cover to wealth and property, and that great destroyer: Greed... It is one thing to talk about desent from God as the cause of morality.. The fact is that community is morality, and when communities are destroyed there is no one to teach morality..The other essential quality to morality is freedom because only by choice are people free or moral... But deny that freedom as all religions do, and you have only as much morality as can be enforced by law...I will admit that churches provide a community, and that, as always, people sacrifice for their communities...But just as in the past, communities unite as much as they divide... And before wide spread law, when the people were the law, then communities policed their own, and guarded their own... What made men moral was not God, but human honor...Outside of ones community every man was on his honor, so that it the exercise of freedom did not bring insult or injury to the whole community...But where are our communities??? Where is group responsibility??? I mean, they still hold every black person responsible for the crimes of a few, but there is no black community control over its members...Law would not allow it...So why should anyone care for their community when it is law that is the force; and its only influence is coersion....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:39 AM
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Walter Williams! It's a disgrace what's going on in todays world. All these non-profit organizations, receiving Taxpayers' money, and doing nothing for the illegitimates having more illegitimates but creating terror on American soil! There was an article, not long ago, titled 'Schools get Taxpayers Money for "Character Building"!'
Character, morals, respect, honesty will never happen, as long as people continue to think they're 'ENTITLED' to everything without working for it! According to my dictionary 'Character is Good Moral Quality and a Hereditary Characteristic!" Building character starts the day a child is conceived and all the money in the world cannot change this! Believe me, this isn't the Taxpayers' fault!
All these social and welfare programs have backfired! Too bad, it's gone on for five decades and no one noticed
until now? "It's better late than never" as the old saying goes, right? "How could anyone be so ignorant (if politicians weren't getting paid big bucks) as to think that "illegitimates having more illegitimates", living off Taxpayers money, and not having any responsibility for themselves, would create a good community, good jobs, good schools, or anything else?
Government must be held accountable for giving Taxpayers monies to anyone or any program!
In todays' world, since politicians create Nafta and Cafta, selling Americans out, taking all the good manufacturing jobs and shipping them overseas, maybe it's time to sell these politicians a one-way ticket to the countries they've sold America to, with no return to America, as they've borrowed trillions, without Taxpayers' consent, and as the old saying goes "There ain't no more money, so anti-up your assets to pay off the debt load you created and you're free to leave America!"
Comment: #3
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Wed Apr 29, 2009 5:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Shirley deLong I like you Shirley.
Comment: #4
Posted by: gary
Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Wow! Did you ever hit the nail on the head with this article. I lived thru the same times and experienced the same things you expressed in the article. The beliefs and values we learn from family teachings/customs and religion cannot be duplicated by laws. The bigger question is what do we do to start reversing the trend that we have seen happening for the past several decades? Your views on this would be much appreciated.
Re: Shirley, I also like the way you think.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Vic Kubani
Tue May 5, 2009 3:22 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Author’s Podcast
|