Outrage at Socialism for the Rich

By Mark Shields

October 16, 2009 4 min read

The anger rises. The fury rages at a new economic order that rules our lives. American capitalism has now been redefined to mean the freedom of the rich to reap enormous rewards if the risks they take do work out and — more importantly — if those risks do not work out, for everybody else to bail out the rich. In the American financial world, we have an economic hybrid: free enterprise for the working majority and socialism for the privileged rich.

Listen to the good news for Goldman Sachs: In 2008, to save that New York investment firm from collapse, the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) of the national government — underwritten by the tax dollars of waitresses, machinists and firefighters — came up with an emergency loan of $10 billion to keep Goldman afloat. But the insolence of wealth was not shaken. In that year when Goldman earned $2.3 billion — while tin-cupping $10 billion from the U.S. treasury — it still rewarded its top employees with bonuses of $4.8 billion.

To be fair, Goldman Sachs has since repaid with interest its $10 billion life-saving loan to the U.S. Citigroup, which eagerly welcomed $45 billion in taxpayer help in 2008 while simultaneously running up a company loss of $27.7 billion — shockingly — still honored its failed corporate leadership with $5.33 billion in bonuses. Citigroup, let it be noted, is one-third owned by U.S. taxpayers.

Don't overlook JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley, which between them, paid out to their brass $5.694 billion more in bonuses than the two organizations made in profits — while at the same time they were seeking and accepting some $35 billion in transfusions from their fellow taxpayers. The road to wealth is obviously using other people's money.

As that widely admired American philosopher Donald Trump once told us, "The point is that you can't be too greedy."

All of this took place while Americans' median income was falling $52,163 a year to $50,303, wiping out all the gains from the preceding decade and dropping to its lowest level since 1997, and the nation's unemployment rate is at its highest in 26 years.

Yesterday, 14,000 Americans lost their health insurance. Both today and again tomorrow, another 14,000 will suffer the loss of their health insurance. Every minute of this day, another seven American families — that means 424 each hour — will lose their homes to foreclosure. Unlike Bank of America and Morgan Stanley, two additional corporate welfare clients, these ordinary folks are obviously not "too big to fail."

And while a record 5.4 million citizens have been out of work for six months or more, the U.S. Senate — which obligingly rescued those bonus-addicted financial giants — has hesitated to even extend unemployment benefits to their fellow citizens.

Has official Washington somehow forgotten — in a society where too often we are what we do — just how cruel life can be when we are "doing nothing"?

"We have always known," the greatest American president of the 20th century told his fellow citizens, "that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics."

The question, some 70 years after Franklin Roosevelt made that statement, is do we agree and are we sufficiently outraged to rebel against taxpayer-subsidized socialism for the rich and a cold shoulder to our hurting brothers and sisters?

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

Like it? Share it!

  • 0

Mark Shields
About Mark Shields
Read More | RSS | Subscribe | Contact



How Many 'Walks of Life' Are There?

How Many 'Walks of Life' Are There?

By Mark Shields
Tom Corbett is the Republican attorney general of the state (to be more precise, the commonwealth) of Pennsylvania and a candidate for governor. Keep reading