creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
15 Feb 2012
Rising Black Social Pathology

The Philadelphia Inquirer's big story Feb. 4 was about how a budget crunch at the Philadelphia School … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Economic Chaos Ahead

Let's think about the kind of mess that we're in. Federal 2010 Medicare and Medicaid expenditures totaled $… Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Obama's Racial Politics

There's been a heap of criticism placed upon President Barack Obama's domestic policies that have promoted … Read More.

The Pretense of Knowledge

Share Comment

The ultimate constraint that we all face is knowledge — what we know and don't know. The knowledge problem is pervasive and by no means trivial as hinted at by just a few examples. You've purchased a house. Was it the best deal you could have gotten? Was there some other house you could have purchased that 10 years later would not have needed extensive repairs or was in a community with more likeable neighbors and a better environment for your children? What about the person you married? Was there another person who would have made for a more pleasing spouse? Though these are important questions, the most intelligent answer you can give to all of them is: "I don't know."

Since you don't know the answers, who do you think, here on Earth, is likely to know and whom would you like to make these decisions for you — Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, George Bush, a czar appointed by Obama or a committee of Washington bureaucrats? I bet that if these people were to forcibly make housing or marital decisions for us, most would deem it tyranny.

You say, "Williams, Congress is not making such monumental decisions that affect my life." Try this. You are a 22-year-old healthy person. Instead of spending $3,000 or $4,000 a year for health insurance, you'd prefer investing that money in equipment to start a landscaping business. Which is the best use of that $3,000 or $4,000 a year — purchasing health insurance or starting up a landscaping business — and who should decide that question: Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, George Bush, aczar appointed by Obama or a committee of Washington bureaucrats? How can they possibly know what's the best use of your earnings, particularly in light of the fact that they have no idea of who you are?

Neither you nor the U.S.

Congress has the complete knowledge to know exactly what's best for you. The difference is that when individuals make their own trade-offs, say between purchasing health insurance or investing in a business, they make wiser decisions because it is they who personally bear the costs and benefits of those decisions. You say, "Hold it, Williams, we've got you now! What if that person gets really sick and doesn't have health insurance. Society suffers the burden of taking care of him." To the extent that is a problem, it is not a problem of liberty; it's a problem of congressionally mandated socialism. Let's look at it.

It is not society that bears the burden; it is some flesh and blood American worker who finds his earnings taken by Congress to finance the health needs of another person. There is absolutely no moral case, much less constitutional case, for Congress forcibly using one American to serve the purposes of another American, a practice that differs only in degree from slavery, which we all should find morally offensive.

Whether it is health care, education, employment or most other areas of our lives, I ask you: Who has the capacity to master all the complexity to make choices on behalf of others? Each of us possesses only a tiny percentage of the knowledge that would be necessary to make totally informed decisions in our own lives, much less the lives of others. There is only one reason for the forcible transference of decision-making authority over important areas of our private lives to elite decision-makers in Congress and government bureaucracies. Doing so confers control, power, wealth and revenue to society's elite. What's in the best interests of individual members of society, such as a person who'd rather launch a landscaping business than purchase a health insurance policy, ranks low on the elite's list of priorities.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Walter Williams, as usual, an excellent article.
'Lying' supposedly will get politicians impeached , then why hasn't
ninety-five percent of politicians been impeached? Let's sell them a one-way
ticket to Gitmo, take all their assets to pay off the trillions they've
borrowed without Taxpayers consent? Six decades later and America is
bankrupt with these 'corrupt, greedy, lying bunch of 'blood-sucking ticks',
still in office, still drawing big salaries and retirements, working on the
same 'programs/ healthcare' for years. They have nothing better to do to
justify the bigs bucks they steal from Taxpayers, as it's obvious none of
them know what they're doing nor care. This is why their favorite saying is
"I'll check on this and get back to you!" This brings another thought to
Taxpayers minds, if the Insurance, Drug companies, Hospitals, and Medical
professionals stop 'paying the politicians to run for office, maybe the
'Politicians License to Steal' will come to a screeching halt!


Politicians take billions from insurance, drug companies, healthcare
professionals and what few businesses are left. This is why Taxpayers can't
afford insurance, hospitals, let alone medications. Passing of Healthcare is
another POWER GRAB and will finish bankrupting America. Fraud and
bankrupting of social security, medicare and medicaid should tells folks
that government run programs have never worked for Taxpayers, just for
Politicians!

Insurance and Drug companies should give their insured, that's paid them big
bucks for years, all their money back. Folks, the Taxpayer that's paid
$200.00 to $750.00 monthly, would be entitled to several million for each
person. Just think, we wouldn't need them at all! What fools we've been
letting these 'blood-sucking ticks' tell us that 'Taxpayers have to spread
the wealth around!' Where is politicians 'wealth they're spreading around?'

Why would politicians want to spend billions of dollars taken from
insurance, drug, hospitals and the small business owners, to run for an
office that pays $200,000.00+-?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Wed Dec 2, 2009 8:20 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Walter E. Williams
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

8 Aug 2007 Silencing Dissent

8 Oct 2008 Lessons From the Bailout

24 Dec 2008 Global Warming Rope-A-Dope