creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
22 May 2013
We Are the Idiots

Dr. Henry Miller, senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, and Gregory Conko, senior fellow at the … Read More.

15 May 2013
Hating America

Brothers Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, who are accused of setting the bombs that exploded at the Boston Marathon,… Read More.

8 May 2013
Honest Examination of Race

One definition given for insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different … Read More.

Our Nation's Future

Comment

Our nation is rapidly approaching a point from which there's little chance to avoid a financial collapse. The heart of our problem can be seen as a tragedy of the commons. That's a set of circumstances when something is commonly owned and individuals acting rationally in their own self-interest produce a set of results that's inimical to everyone's long-term interest. Let's look at an example of the tragedy of the commons phenomenon and then apply it to our national problem.

Imagine there are 100 cattlemen all having an equal right to graze their herds on 1,000 acres of commonly owned grassland. The rational self-interested response of each cattleman is to have the largest herd that he can afford. Each cattleman pursing similar self-interests will produce results not in any of the cattlemen's long-term interest — overgrazing, soil erosion and destruction of the land's usefulness. Even if they all recognize the dangers, does it pay for any one cattleman to cut the size of his herd? The short answer is no because he would bear the cost of having a smaller herd while the other cattlemen gain at his expense. In the long term, they all lose because the land will be overgrazed and made useless.

We can think of the federal budget as a commons to which each of our 535 congressmen and the president have access. Like the cattlemen, each congressman and the president want to get as much out of the federal budget as possible for their constituents. Political success depends upon "bringing home the bacon." Spending is popular, but taxes to finance the spending are not. The tendency is for spending to rise and its financing to be concealed through borrowing and inflation.

Does it pay for an individual congressman to say, "This spending is unconstitutional and ruining our nation, and I'll have no part of it; I will refuse a $500 million federal grant to my congressional district"? The answer is no because he would gain little or nothing, plus the federal budget wouldn't be reduced by $500 million.

Other congressmen would benefit by having $500 million more for their districts.

What about the constituents of a principled congressman? If their congressman refuses unconstitutional spending, it doesn't mean that they pay lower federal income taxes. All that it means is constituents of some other congressmen get the money while the nation spirals toward financial ruin, and they wouldn't be spared from that ruin because their congressman refused to participate in unconstitutional spending.

What we're witnessing in Greece, Italy, Ireland, Portugal and other parts of Europe is a direct result of their massive spending to accommodate the welfare state. A greater number of people are living off government welfare programs than are paying taxes. Government debt in Greece is 160 percent of gross domestic product. The other percentages of GDP are 120 in Italy, 104 in Ireland and 106 in Portugal. As a result of this debt and the improbability of their ever paying it, their credit ratings either have reached or are close to reaching junk bond status.

Here's the question for us: Is the U.S. moving in a direction toward or away from the troubled EU nations? It turns out that our national debt, which was 35 percent of GDP during the 1970s, is now 106 percent of GDP, a level not seen since World War II's 122 percent. That debt, plus our more than $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities, has led Standard & Poor's to downgrade our credit rating from AAA to AA+, and the agency is keeping the outlook at "negative" as a result of its having little confidence that Congress will take on the politically sensitive job of tackling the same type of entitlement that has turned Europe into a basket case.

I am all too afraid that Benjamin Franklin correctly saw our nation's destiny when he said, "When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

14 Comments | Post Comment
Not only are we exceeding our budget but the banks are making risky foreign loans that went bad during the last financial crisis. The result is that trillions of dollars went overseas to prop up bad loans. We are trying to rule the world economically with American dollars without political clout and the result is greater and greater national deficits. Like you said, the dollar will soon have junk status in the world and our country will begin to look more like third world countries in the not too distant future. There is hope that we can pull out of this impending disaster but only if many of the steps recommended in my book HOW TO CHANGE THE WORLD: HOW TO SAVE THE WORLD; THE TRUTH ABOUT EVERYTHING are instituted and bankrupt old laws are wisely updated.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Uldis Sprogis
Tue May 29, 2012 8:34 AM
What a great analogy to drive the point home. Well done article and full of common sense as usual. Uldis, is your book available in book store or availble for download on kindle?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue May 29, 2012 9:25 AM
I believe we have passed the point of no return. The crash of the economy is like an avalanche waiting to happen. Once it starts nothing will be able to stop it until it has run its course. There is going to be much misery and suffering, riots and violence. And those responsible--the people--won't even realize that they are the cause. As Frederic Bastiat said, "The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else."
Comment: #3
Posted by: D.M. Mitchell
Tue May 29, 2012 10:05 AM
You may be right Mitchell. A good topic for a future article would be what would an economic collapse look like and how can individuals prepare for it.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue May 29, 2012 11:03 AM
As a parent of children entering the workforce and starting off in their own lives, I am amazed that there is not more concern coming from the young crowd that has been saddled with this tremendous burden. It is they that will suffer most. Imagine having small children and having them go hungry because the power grid is down or the water systems have failed. Our reliance on computer systems for everything, including delivery of all utilities is extremely fragile and vulnerable. I do work for a local utility, and in our discussions , we have come to the conclusion that the only reason we havent been attacked there is simply because they haven't realized how easy it would be. A "Black Swan " event will happen, probably sooner rather than later, and if you are not prepared, it is quite likely you will end up a statistic....
Comment: #5
Posted by: Daniel Yates
Tue May 29, 2012 8:28 PM
Re: Chris McCoy The book is available on Kindle or Nook book and you will find it faster if you search under my name.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Uldis Sprogis
Wed May 30, 2012 4:27 AM
Re: Daniel Yates;... Sir... Mr. Williams is correct about our nearness to collapse, and to address this problem as a tragedy of the commons; but you are wrong to worry about the future... First, Capitalism has been on life support for most of my life, and needed to be revived many times before I was born... If there is no money in the rich, and if they cannot be taxed to support the government that supports them, then the whole thing is wax and feathers and needs to fall... If you have to tax future generations because today's generation cannot pay, then what makes anyone think that future generation will be better able to pay given our own inability to defend our rights from the predations of the rich when rights equal good wages that can pay taxes and support government???
There certainly is a problem with the commons, essentially a problem with the whole commonwealth...It would not matter that the commonwealth were privatized, if in private hands it would do as in the hands of small holders and support the population... Nothing is ever free and clear, but if you sell the nation's resources, then once they are depleted no one is going to pay more for them no matter how much they made with them... Ever since Jackson, the government has used the excuse of the "National" debt to sell off more of our commonwealth and rights for next to nothing, and it should be able to tax what it sells, and in that way bring it back into the commonwealth, but they do not do so...
The income tax which was supported by the poor, and the peasant farmer as a means of bringing justice into the tax code has been pushed down to cover nearly fifty percent of the population, and it has failed to do what it intended, which has been to tax the rich into the support of their government...Relieved of taxation, realestate has been kept off the market for years and kept as an object of investment and speculation, doing no good, contributing nothing to the commonwealth, and not returning to the commonwealth...
Try to remember that in this country property was for the first time in the world, really and truly free of restrictions, and all it ever had to do was support the commonwealth... This it has not done... Nor has money as the financial power of raw capital paid for its support from the government... The taxes that may once have made it pay its share of support have been used instead to break the population... Without rights, people do not have fair wages, and living hand to mouth they do not own property and do not support their government... What they cannot do, the rich do not do by choice, and if the government is not capable of making those who can pay, pay; then it has no right to our respect or support...
We are supporting a government that does not support us or defend our rights... The rich are not supporting the very government that defends their rights and supports them with constant bailouts at the public's expense... It deserves to fall... And; looking at modern history, bankruptcy causes revolution... And I do not think it will be fun or easy... The right will force society to move forward by trying to push everyone backwards, and no one can go back...Because the forces of reaction are the most violent and are well armed, it will be a bloody, nasty affair... I expect the forces of progress to win only because we cannot afford another dark age for humanity... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #7
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed May 30, 2012 5:02 AM
I see only one future, and that is very frightening. We will have widespread unemployment, collapse of infrastructure and basic social services. When people loose everything, they have nothing to lose and the result will be widespread riots and the basic degeneration of society. The military and police are too few in number to stop it and they will be chewed up in a sausage ginder with nothing to show but death and destruction. The world elites will sit in the protected places, stocked with supplies and guarded by mercenaries. They think that they will be immune, but eventually, their own "guard-dogs" will turn on them and they will end up murdered or worse. The political and bureaucrats will be some of the first to be strung up from lamp posts and trees becuase they helped perpetrate this crime against the people. Many millions will die and many more will suffer due to the collective greed of the people and the evils of the statist technocrats who think that they have to rule every aspect of our lives. The only bright spot will be the small enclaves of people who survive in the intermountain west and after several generations, a new republic will rise from the ashes. I do not want this to happen and I pray it will not, but human nature being a constant - and having seen the widespread "dumbed-down" citizenry of this once great republic, I see no way out of the mess that has been created with our willing cooperation.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Chris White
Wed May 30, 2012 5:08 AM
I agree with all the very valid gloom and doom expressed above. I'm just glad I'm 73, without family, and may not be around to witness the fall.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Derel Schrock
Wed May 30, 2012 6:45 AM
Re: James A, Sweeney
A most eloquent exposition on the position of communism and Marxism (but you forgot to throw in the term 'bourgeois', but you almost defined it...). Though thoughtful and well-presented, your ideas are still just a plate of turd being offered up to the people as a hollow solution to the real problem, that being a federal government operating a soft tyranny (with the 'soft' part about to make it's exit).
When we, as a society, stop screwing with individual liberty and true property rights (ALL property, not just real estate), we might actually see a truly free society for the first time sine 1789.
Comment: #10
Posted by: EL
Wed May 30, 2012 10:41 AM
Re: EL; ... Sir... I have looked at Communism, but I am not in the least idealist... Realistically, no people can claim freedom who do not have control of the means of production, and since the means of production affects us as much or more than any force of nature, it is the business of government to govern business... Now; many years ago, Justice Marshall of the Supreme Court gave the most constructive interpretation of the commerce clause, but he also gave to corporations and to property rights the greatest possible freedom... But that dog no longer needs the protection of law, and now needs to law to get after it...He was the first to push the view of corporations as a virtual individual that has resulted in the most expensive dirt slinging election before us in time since these bodies without souls have all the rights of people and are immortal as well...
The influence of the wealthy and their corporations on government is at its zeneth, and we are at our nadir as a people... If it should all fall, it will not be our fault, but the natural end of a failed economy...I do not advocate socialism... I advocate for people minding their own business to the extent that it remains their business, and when it becomes the business of others, for them to mind it together... What is the point of telling the future how to live when the problem is the present economy and government being an impediment to justice and to progress???
Tell people the truth: Capitalism is a good theory that does not work in reality... Socialism works everywhere... When a tornado sweeps whole towns into piles, no one says me first, and skwoo you... People find they are willing to share their resources, and are no worse off for it... All of humanity has come out of socialism... Almost all families are socialistic, and even our society has many socialsitic elements only because we could not live without them... If eveyone had to have their own road or hospital or park we would soon starve to death and no one would get anywhere... It is capitalism that has never existed without these gluts and depressions and wars and wants that has always been on the verge of failure... Just how much of the commonwealth we see private people destroy for their profit will answer what sort of sane economy we can enjoy in the future...And I will let others decide...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #11
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu May 31, 2012 5:43 AM
Re: Chris White...Sir... The solution to the problems you present are simple... The problem you do not see is dangerous... Before the rich give up their government and their wealth they will nuke us even if it means they have to eat fallout... All the problems you suggest could be easily managed... Just as in the replacement of the articles of confederation by the US Constitution, all we need is something new to replace the old, and enough of them to go along with it...They may have mercenaries, but it is the people who make money meaningful, and we could soon see that what we have been trading our lives for is simply paper... And it is their control of that paper that has given them all our wealth and all our power...All these forms from economy to government to religon are all a matter of faith, and people are losing their faith...
Look at all the young people graduating from college with a mountain of debt, much of it owned by the government and tacked onto the national debt -who cannot pay off their loans or even support themselves... They are pushed into jobs that pay, and to pay they must give profit, but it is not clear that such jobs and such educations as support them give anyone an essential understanding of their existence... The real danger of a liberal education is not that liberals result from it, though many do... A liberal education gives to a few a sense of their own being in nature and in time so they are not alienated and isolated in a cube farm doing and accepting a meaningless job for too little of wages to even pay for the education essential to it...
Mr. Obama is being attacked for not being a believer in American Exceptionalism... What is that to believe in??? Does anyone think the Greeks or Romans did not believe they were exceptional??? And what did history have to say when it swept them off their roofs??? All people believe they are exceptional... The only thing we need prove is that we are human beings and worthy of freedom, and to be worthy of it one must be moral, which means self governing.... Usually, freedom is taken, and some excuse is always found to take more until people are made slaves, or they take their freedom back... It does not have to be bloody... We can all have fun if we know what we are doing... Jefferson talked about changing forms in the Declaration... Those people understood what they were doing, and the understanding of ones objective make success in achieving it much more certain... We are looking for a change of forms..That's all!!! The sooner the old forms fall the sooner we can pick up the pieces and go on...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #12
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu May 31, 2012 6:11 AM
So Mr. Sweeney what is your solution? More government, higher taxes, loss of freedoms, more unions, etc? Yeah that really seems to be working in Europe, Venezuela, Cuba, and other socialist "paradises" around the world.
Comment: #13
Posted by: Thetruth
Mon Jun 11, 2012 7:44 PM
Nobody is mentioning the wars we are in that is bankrupting the country? We are not talking millions here but Billions approaching trillions for money defending other countries that we have no business being involved in.
We are allies with a nation of terrorist called Israel that has lied, cheated, stolen, betrayed and those words they have done to the USA. Israels enemies are our enemies. We also send them billions each year that should stop.
End the wars, end our being allied with Israel, put the money back in the USA and put AMERICA FIRST.
Comment: #14
Posted by: Joseph Rizoli
Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:34 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Walter E. Williams
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Jamie Stiehm
Jamie StiehmUpdated 24 May 2013
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 24 May 2013
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 24 May 2013

13 Jun 2012 Duped by Congressional Lies

4 Jul 2012 The Underclass

5 Oct 2011 Social Security Disaster