opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
10 Feb 2016
Sloppy Language and Thinking

George Orwell said, "But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought." Gore Vidal … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Isn't It Strange?

There is a letter titled "Isn't It Strange?" making the rounds in email boxes. It asks questions to which our … Read More.

26 Jan 2016
Education Insanity

Some credit Albert Einstein, others credit Benjamin Franklin, with the observation that "the definition of … Read More.

Middle East Democracy


Here's the first paragraph of my last year's column "Democracy Is Impossible":

"After Moammar Gadhafi's downfall as Libya's tyrannical ruler, politicians and 'experts' in the U.S. and elsewhere, including French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, are saying that his death marked the end of 42 years of tyranny and the beginning of democracy in Libya. Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., said Gadhafi's death represented an opportunity for Libya to make a peaceful and responsible transition to democracy. House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said, 'Now it is time for Libya's Transitional National Council to show the world that it will respect the rights of all Libyans (and) guide the nation to democracy.' German Chancellor Angela Merkel said that 'Libya must now quickly make further determined steps in the direction of democracy.'"

It's good to have hope, but if we're going to be realistic, there's little chance for Middle East emergence of what we in the West call democracy.

Almost a year ago, both Egyptians and Westerners welcomed and celebrated the downfall of three decades of Egyptian dictator Hosni Mubarak's tyrannical rule. It was called an "Arab Spring." A year later, Egyptians are once again taking to the streets, this time protesting the tyrannical acts of President Mohamed Morsi, who represents the vision and ideological orientation of the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood's goal has always been to impose Shariah law. Egyptian tyranny hasn't been eliminated; its form has changed.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's dictatorship is now being challenged by a hodgepodge of armed resistance groups nominally united as the Free Syrian Army. Speaking for our nation, last year President Obama said, "The United States has been inspired by the Syrian peoples' pursuit of a peaceful transition to democracy. They have braved ferocious brutality at the hands of their government." Is al-Assad's downfall in any way more likely to produce democracy than Gadhafi's downfall or Mubarak's downfall? Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is optimistic in saying the rebel protest shows "the strong desire of the Syrian people ...

for a Syria that is democratic, just and inclusive."

The human experience should have taught us that just getting rid of a particular dictatorship is only half the struggle. We must always ask what's going to replace it. The 1917 Russian revolution got rid of the Czars only to be replaced by the far greater brutality of the Bolsheviks under Joseph Stalin and his successors. In China, Chiang Kai-shek's dictatorial rule was replaced by Mao Tse-tung's unprecedented barbarity, which became responsible for the deaths of 76 million Chinese. Cuba's Fulgencio Batista's dictatorship was replaced with that of Fidel Castro. The injustices of Western colonialism in Africa were replaced with homegrown brutal dictators who murdered their citizens.

In most countries in the Middle East, the collection of human rights that Westerners know as personal liberty is nonexistent. According to Freedom House's 2011 "Freedom in the World" survey, as well as Amnesty International's annual report for 2011, most North African and Middle Eastern countries are ranked either "repressive" or "not free." Moreover, I believe there's little prospect for liberty and whatever the West tries to promote in terms of liberty is doomed to failure and disappointment. The fact of the matter is that nations in the Middle East do not share the cultural and philosophical foundations of the West that created its respect for the rule of law and private property rights.

What should the West do about the gross violations of human rights so prevalent in North Africa, the Middle East and elsewhere? My short answer is: mind our own business and only intervene when there are direct threats to our national defense or economic interests. Otherwise, what they want to do to one another is none of our business.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



6 Comments | Post Comment
My sentiments exactly.
Comment: #1
Posted by: mark wells
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:29 AM
Mr. Williams, do you consider yourself to be a Republican or a Libertarian?
Comment: #2
Posted by: mark wells
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:33 AM
These Middle East events, the entire Arab Spring, come under the headings of "Be careful what you wish for" and "the Law of Unintended Consequences." At least with Mubarak's Egypt, we had a stabilizing ally. When al-Assad passes, his replacement could be another Morsi and the result another Islamist country to gang up on Israel. Already, the Iraqis allow Russian overflights of weaponry and support for the Islamists.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Derel Schrock
Wed Dec 26, 2012 7:31 AM
I agree it's time for America and Americans to stop being the police of the world, and to keep our nose out of places and where people don't want us. After all, history is proof that after all the wars we've fought on behalf of others--sometimes at their behest, sometimes not--and after thousands of American lives lost, the very people we fought for are the very persons who despise us. It's like the old saying: "The people who OWE US hate us!"

Yet, America and Americans should know and understand we didn't fight wars to bring democracy to people, rather to free them from cruel dictators and regimes, and often death. We fought "just and obligatory wars," when rogue governments beat-up and killed their own people, and when the elderly, women and children could not defend themselves. America and Americans could not and would not stand by and do nothing. Yes, we wish democracy upon them, but democracy was not and is not our aim: Life, living, being, and doing via "freedom" has always been the spirit of America.

People hate police, just like we hate traffic lights--especially stop signs. Yet, we must endeavor to imagine life without them.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Rick Martinez
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:04 PM
Its ironic that we try to bring democracy to these countries when we really don't practice it ourselves.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:29 AM
The only reason we are in the Middle East is for OIL and Israel. We would not be there if they just grew strawberries!
Also,the Israelies try their best to aggravate the Palestinians,thus the rest of the Arab world.
The Muslims do not believe in the separation of Church and State,there Church is their State!!
Comment: #6
Posted by: Ron Lee
Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:17 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Walter E. Williams
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 13 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 13 Feb 2016

6 Feb 2012 Economic Chaos Ahead

10 Sep 2012 Who May Tax and Spend?

23 Jul 2008 Black Education