creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
23 May 2012
Should Black People Tolerate This?

Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of the time, the murderer is another black person.… Read More.

16 May 2012
Should We Obey All Laws?

Let's think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a … Read More.

9 May 2012
Leftist Race-baiters

MSNBC's Chris Matthews, in a recent debate with former Republican National Chairman Michael Steele, called … Read More.

Gross Media Ignorance

Share Comment

There's little that's intelligent or informed about Time magazine editor Richard Stengel's article "One Document, Under Siege" (June 23, 2011). It contains many grossly ignorant statements about our Constitution. If I believed in conspiracies, I'd say Stengel's article is part of a leftist agenda to undermine respect for the founding values of our nation.

Stengel says: "The framers were not gods and were not infallible. Yes, they gave us, and the world, a blueprint for the protection of democratic freedoms — freedom of speech, assembly, religion — but they also gave us the idea that a black person was three-fifths of a human being, that women were not allowed to vote and that South Dakota should have the same number of Senators as California, which is kind of crazy. And I'm not even going to mention the Electoral College."

My column last week addressed the compromise whereby each slave was counted as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of determining representation in the House of Representatives and Electoral College. Had slaves been counted as whole people, slaveholding states would have had much greater political power. I agree the framers were not gods and were not infallible, but they had far greater wisdom and principle than today's politicians.

The framers held democracy and majority rule in deep contempt. As a matter of fact, the term democracy appears in none of our founding documents. James Madison argued that "measures are too often decided, not according to the rules of justice and the rights of the minor party, but by the superior force of an interested and overbearing majority." John Adams said: "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." Stengel's majoritarian vision sees it as anti-democratic that South Dakota and California both have two senators, but the framers wanted to reduce the chances that highly populated states would run roughshod over thinly populated states.

They established the Electoral College to serve the same purpose in determining the presidency.

The framers recognized that most human abuses were the result of government. As Thomas Paine said, "government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil." Because of their distrust, the framers sought to keep the federal government limited in its power. Their distrust of Congress is seen in the language used throughout our Constitution. The Bill of Rights says Congress shall not abridge, shall not infringe, shall not deny and other shall-nots, such as disparage, violate and deny. If the founders did not believe Congress would abuse our God-given, or natural, rights, they would not have provided those protections. I've always argued that if we depart this world and see anything resembling the Bill of Rights at our next destination, we'll know we're in hell. A bill of rights in heaven would be an affront to God.

Other founder distrust for government is found in the Constitution's separation of powers, checks and balances, and several anti-majoritarian provisions, such as the Electoral College, two-thirds vote to override a veto and the requirement that three-quarters of state legislatures ratify changes to the Constitution.

Stengel says, "If the Constitution was intended to limit the federal government, it sure doesn't say so." That statement is beyond ignorance. The 10th Amendment reads: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Stengel apparently has not read The Federalist No. 45, in which James Madison, the acknowledged father of the Constitution, said: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."

Stengel's article is five pages online, and I've only commented on the first. There's also little in the remaining pages that reflects understanding and respect for our nation's most important document.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
"The framers recognized that most human abuses were the result of government"
This was not true. The most human abuses going on at the time were the slavery of another race of people....not taxes for the king. The extermination, robbery and serfdom of indigenous people the world over (especially for sea-faring jolly old England). The excesses of international colonial capitalism...unbridled exploitation and thievery.
This is where the conservative constructionists always get off the path of rational thought.
"Government" to the Founding fathers....meant...the King...the monarchy and it's taxing interests backed by a military occupation "government".
That was the only government they ever knew.
What they did was simply amazing...their military Revolution was the greatest blasphemy in political history...challenging God, the church, and the "divine right of kings". King George ruled by the "divine right of kings...a contract which was wholly invented by... the wealthy/military elite and God ......(otherwise known as the Pope. leader of the Roman Catholic Church).
It was taught and ordered to all that God consecrated and specially blessed the right of royal birth and made everyone subject to them; kings queens and their families, consorts, heirs and assigns... and their children were special children of blessed by God with this same inheritance.
Oddly enough...the Republicans of 1980 have managed to bring back this Godly entitlement of.."the divine right of the elite wealthy".
The "divine right of kings" hangs heavily on the America's democracy...meanwhile the Europeans who followed our example are laughing at what American Democracy has become.
This is where Christianity, like democracy got off the path.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Oracle
Mon Jul 4, 2011 2:45 PM
Richard Stengel is just another progressive enabler whose sole intent is to deceive the people of the United States into believing that the government is TO the people instead of " of, by and for the people ". We need a president that would make people like Walter Williams , Thomas Sowell , and Phyllis Scalafly and others of their intellence level his czars instead of the progressive garbadge Obama has chosen . These are truly great people .
Comment: #2
Posted by: Buck
Mon Jul 4, 2011 4:13 PM
"It contains many grossly ignorant statements about our Constitution."

I love you Walter, but please, never give them credit, and a pass, for mere ignorance, when what they do is deliberately seek to deceive America in order to destroy the very heart and soul of human freedom. Never under estimating your enemy means calling their evil intentions what it is - pure evil -never ignorance. That is what they hope you'll believe.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Don L
Tue Jul 5, 2011 4:32 AM
Nice article. However it is unreasonable for Mr. Williams to say at the outset that he doesn't believe in conspiracies. Ridiculous! People engage in conspiracies of one sort or another every day. So those who claim they "don't believe in conspiracies" have clearly fallen into the ultra-PC trap of the post-9/11 world. Which is interesting considering that 9/11 itself was quite obviously a conspiracy. The only question is who participated in it. The official investigation of course took great pains in never addressing that all-important question.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Rich Aucoin
Tue Jul 5, 2011 6:13 AM
Amen! Amen! Amen! Thank you Prof. Williams for your diligence in the defense of the Constitution. Your understanding of this document surpasses most of those so-called intelligent pundits and politicians.
I have to agree with Don L that they are deliberately deceiving the public and promoting the idea that the Constitution so flawed that it needs to be replaced. By telling blacks (I hate the term African-American) that the 3/5 rule was racist and made them less of a human being than whites is a deliberate attempt to stir up hatred for our founding document.
If they ever succeed in abolishing the electoral college God help us all.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Nelson Brown
Tue Jul 5, 2011 6:15 AM
If it is any consulation, this article will be read by tens of thousands more than Time magazine. Moreover, "Cat in the Hat" is far more logical and well written than Stengel's article. I would note that the Framers sabotaged slavery in the Constitution that would later become its undoing.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Kenneth Neil
Tue Jul 5, 2011 6:31 AM
Re: Oracle "The framers recognized that most human abuses were the result of government"
This was not true. The most human abuses going on at the time were the slavery of another race of people....not taxes for the king. The extermination, robbery and serfdom of indigenous people the world over (especially for sea-faring jolly old England). The excesses of international colonial capitalism...unbridled exploitation and thievery.
The framers were and are right. You have to check the report, DEATH BY GOVERNMENT By R.J. Rummel. (Dr. Walter E Williams wrote about it years ago.) the abuse and the death by government is far greater than died in combat in all the foreign and internal wars of the century!
61,911,000 Murdered: The Soviet Gulag State
35,236,000 Murdered: The Communist Chinese Ant Hill
20,946,000 Murdered: The Nazi Genocide State
10,214,000 Murdered: The Depraved Nationalist Regime
5,964,000 Murdered: Japan's Savage Military
2,035,000 Murdered: The Khmer Rouge Hell State
"given popular estimates of the dead in a major nuclear war, this total democide is as though such a war did occur, but with its dead spread over a century. "
Comment: #7
Posted by: Sean
Wed Jul 6, 2011 3:43 PM
With respect to the senatorial equality of California and South Dakota (for example), I believe this provision underlines the original sovereignty of the several states at the time, rather than an innate populist cynicism. For one instance, see Federalist No. 43:
'The exception in favor of the equality of suffrage in the Senate, was probably meant as a palladium to the residuary sovereignty of the States, implied and secured by that principle of representation in one branch of the legislature; and was probably insisted on by the States particularly attached to that equality.'
Comment: #8
Posted by: Stephen MacLean
Fri Jul 8, 2011 7:53 AM
Hello to my fellow UCLA Bruin, esteemed editorial contributor to my medical publication, Administrative Radiology Journal--and friend--apart in distance but not in heart, Walter Williams. I'm pleased to see you're still sharing your brilliance and passion. The world needs not a voice that is right when the world is right, but a voice that is right when the world is wrong.

What can be said about Time Magazine, Stengler, and his article? There's a graveyard full of fallen magazines, and history is crowded with men who would be gods. A half-truth is a whole lie. If we add to the truth, we subtract from it.

To the casual reader of Time Magazine and Stengel's article, unfortunately, the “word was fitly spoken.” The article was well written, and thus masked the deception of the content. It reminded me a bit of evil: “One of the great attempts at deception is evil convincing the world it doesn't exist.” We know evil has many tools and deception is the handle that fits them all. We also know evil is the great tempter, but not the great conqueror!

There's not much more to say about that article, or magazines or articles of that level.

On the other hand, if anyone would like to enjoy a brief, concise, brilliant, insightful article by Walter Williams on how our age-old constitution works in modern society, I call your attention to Seduction, Rape and Government. God only knows when Walter wrote it, but ask for it and get it. It's as good now as when he wrote it back when.

Keep up the great work, Walter. Continued Success always. Your friend,

Rick Martinez, M.D., Ph.D., MBA (ret)
Chancellor Emeritus and William Osler Scholar
John J. Handy Professor of Medicine
Administrative Radiology
Glendale, CA
Comment: #9
Posted by: Rick Martinez
Fri Jul 8, 2011 10:06 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Walter E. Williams
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

16 Jun 2010 Economic Myths, Fallacies and Stupidity

21 Apr 2010 Taxes and Voting

22 Oct 2008 Affordable Health Care