opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Susan Estrich
12 Sep 2014
Thirteen Years Later

It seems like yesterday. And yet, so much was different. My kids were little. I still felt young. We were all … Read More.

10 Sep 2014
The Measles Are Back

No, it's not a rock group. You're lucky if you can't remember. It's a disease that was gone, and now it's back.… Read More.

5 Sep 2014

As if beheadings were not terrifying enough, as if the spread of extremism and hatred were not unsettling enough,… Read More.

Commander in Chief


"If we take the proper steps, we can save lives, but we have to act fast," President Obama said on Tuesday. "We can't dawdle on this one. We have to move with force and make sure that we are catching this as best we can given that this has broken out in ways we have not seen before."

The president was in Atlanta announcing an expanded military effort to aid African countries fighting Ebola, but he also might have been talking about the necessity of stopping the oil-fueled terrorism and hate of ISIL.

Obama did not set about to be a foreign policy president. He was going to be the health care president, the guy who focused on jobs and equality and the environment and education.

But with two years left in his term, the president can't do much of anything about any of those things, other than issue executive orders and (if Democrats hold onto the Senate) appoint people. If Democrats lose the Senate, so much for the appointments piece. For better or worse, like it or not, the domestic agenda — whether right or left — is caught in gridlock. For better or worse, like it or not, Obama must face the challenges of a world in crisis.

Amidst the horror being wreaked by these extremists is an opportunity for this president to rise above the pettiness of American politics and act as the commander in chief. The extremists have created a coalition that would not otherwise exist, and, equally improbably, they have silenced the partisan attacks from Speaker Boehner and his crowd. Now the president must take the next step — away from politics.

Leave it to the Senate Democrats to fight their fights in the battleground states where the president's presence doesn't help anyway. Enough with the endless fundraising for negative ads and back-and-forth blame games.

Enlist Bill Clinton to do the domestic rallies. Send Joe Biden to collect checks from the big donors. The best thing Obama can do is to confront the world, speaking for a united country, facing danger with determination and boldness.

This is not our president's natural inclination. His critics, and even his friends, have complained that "not doing something stupid" is not a strategy or a worldview. Even now, with the country, and especially his opponents, ready to give him more authority than he is asking for, the concern — and it is a real one — is that the president is asking for too little and not too much, that it may take special forces "advisers" to stop ISIL and not just air strikes, that no boots on the ground might more accurately mean no boots on the ground in frontline combat.

We have had too many presidents who have found it too easy to send young men and women into harm's way. Not making mistakes is not a strategy, but it remains a good idea. The president should not be reckless, but neither should he be timid.

I usually start to laugh when politicians start invoking "the American people," as if we are a monolith who speaks in one voice directly into the ear that is not hooked up to a television camera. But this is one of those occasions where it seems almost true that the country wants to be united, wants to be strong, wants to fight back and, most importantly, wants a president we can trust and rely on in the battle.

Easy? Of course not. But the president is not the newbie he was six years ago. The best thing he can do for his party, his country and his legacy, let alone the people who are in harm's way, is to focus not only on the belated battle against Ebola, but also on the belated and necessary world effort to deal with the threat of extremism that knows no limits. He might just be the national security president yet. And by the way, the Democrats might even hold the Senate.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



3 Comments | Post Comment
In her Op-Ed, Ms. Estrich wrote: "The best thing he (i.e., Obama) can do for his party, his country and his legacy, let alone the people who are in harm's way, is to focus not only on the belated battle against Ebola, but also on the belated and necessary world effort to deal with the threat of extremism that knows no limits. He might just be the national security president yet."

I'm afraid you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear or a Winston Churchill out a James Buchanan. If the dear leader had any diplomatic or national security skills, he would have shown them by now.

In the last six years, the President has clearly demonstrated his inability to:
(1) Work productively with members of his own party or friendly foreign leaders (let alone anyone who opposes him).
(2) Take the advice of his senior (and presumably more knowledgeable) advisors (e.g., The Joint Chiefs of Staff or the CINCs).
(3) Admit his own mistakes and correct them.
(4) Hold anyone (From the IRS to the President of Syria) accountable for their actions.

This all loudly proclaims that the transition Ms. Estrich hopes for is far beyond the dear leaders skill set. Really Ms. Estrich, wish for something more obtainable, like a Faster Than Light (FTL) space drive.

The best the country can expect is a successful delaying action until the 2016 elections. Hopefully, by then, the country will have by then learned something about both the value of electing leaders who have a demonstrated ability to lead, and the dangers of electing untested dreamers to high office.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Old Navy
Wed Sep 17, 2014 7:34 AM
Government gridlock - I love it!!
As far a Commander in Chief we don't have one!
A person's strength lies in when they can admit they are wrong! Susan?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Oldtimer
Wed Sep 17, 2014 10:08 AM
Commander in Chief ? Give me a break ! No !

Liar in Chief? Yes.
Deceiver in Chief? Yes!
Narcissist in Chief? Yes!
Islamist sympathizer in Chief? Yes!
Doofus in Chief? Yes!
Ditherer in Chief? Yes!
Coward in Chief? Yes!

Strategist in Chief? LOL!

To barry boy he is a commander. To Moochelle he is a commander. To the morons who continue to give him the affirmative action pass he is a commander.

But to a commander? He is no commander.
Comment: #3
Posted by: joseph wright
Thu Sep 18, 2014 8:34 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Susan Estrich
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
David Sirota
David SirotaUpdated 19 Sep 2014
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 19 Sep 2014
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 19 Sep 2014

12 Oct 2012 Smokin' Joe

4 Mar 2011 How Law Works

20 Aug 2010 The Convent at Auschwitz