opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
John Stossel
John Stossel
10 Feb 2016
High-Tech Ted

Politicians tailor their messages to different audiences. Facing New Hampshire's primary, Ted Cruz talked … Read More.

3 Feb 2016
Political Arrogance

After the Iowa caucus results, it looks like Hillary Clinton vs. Marco Rubio in November! They lead the … Read More.

27 Jan 2016
Running on Empty

Cars run on fuel. Politicians run on votes, and they'll do almost anything to get them. That includes … Read More.

A Post-Post Office World


Even parts of government that look like a business never get run with the efficiency of a business. Just look at the post office.

They buy commercials and tout their services the way private businesses do. They offer a service that customers want.

But a real business can't get away with losing billions every year. (I guess in the era of bailouts, I should say shouldn't get away with it.) The post office lost $16 billion last year, despite having all sorts of advantages that most private businesses don't have.

They have a near monopoly on first-class mail delivery. You want to deliver something to someone? You better not put it in their mailbox — that's illegal. The U.S. Postal Service doesn't pay sales tax or property tax. They don't even pay parking tickets.

With advantages like that, how do they lose money?

They are part of the government, under the thumb of Congress, and that invites calcified, inefficient behavior.

"We are expected to operate like a business, but Congress has not allowed us the flexibility to operate like a business," said Postal Service Board of Governors Chairman Mickey D. Barnett on my TV show. It's all "part of being a quasi-governmental entity. That's how the cookie crumbles." Barnett added that the post office has "union contracts that have no layoff provisions."

Reality is at odds with the proud claim on the post office's website that "Since Ben Franklin ... the Postal Service has grown and changed with America." But it's barely changed. You don't tend to see change in "quasi-governmental entities." You see stagnation.

This year the post office tried to limit Saturday delivery to save money. But Congress forbade the change. The politicians' constituents like getting their mail six days a week.

"They don't want a cut in Saturday delivery," Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., told me.

"The USPS does need reform," Rep. Sam Graves, R-Mo., told the Kansas City Star. "However, reducing core services is not a long-term plan. I worry that reducing services will lead to other reductions like closing rural post offices."

But the post office should do both.

The government maintains hundreds of tiny local post offices, each of which brings in less than $700 a month. Running those offices costs much more than that. Some are just one mile away from other post offices.

People like "universal service," which has been taken to mean that every American must get mail service, no matter how deep in the boondocks they live. The post office even hauls mail by mule to the bottom of the Grand Canyon.

"The post office provides something that's extremely valuable and has to be maintained, and that's universal service," Grayson told me. "There are countries a lot poorer than the United States, including the Congo ... that try to provide universal mail service to everybody. ... People don't want post offices closed!"

On the floor of Congress, Sen. Al Franken, D-Minn., proclaimed that universal service is required, saying, "It's in the Constitution."

But it's not. The Constitution says, "Congress shall have the Power To ... establish Post Offices." But it doesn't have to use that power.

Cato Institute budget analyst Tad DeHaven argues, "People living in rural America aren't living there by force. ... Go back to history. Private carriers picked up the mail from the post office and took it the last mile, or people came to the post office and picked it up."

And private alternatives are much better today. We have e-mail. UPS delivers 300 packages a minute and makes a profit . Federal Express, UPS and others thrive by finding new ways to cut costs. They don't do it because they were born nicer people. They do it because of the pressure of competition. They make money — while the post office loses $16 billion.

Why not just privatize it? No more special government protections, no limit on competitors offering similar services.

Then mail service would be even better than before. The market delivers.

John Stossel is host of "Stossel" on the Fox Business Network. He's the author of "Give Me a Break" and of "Myth, Lies, and Downright Stupidity." To find out more about John Stossel, visit his site at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at




4 Comments | Post Comment
Why arre my previous comments missing? Are you editing out anyone who provides contradicting evidence?
Comment: #1
Posted by: BigAl
Wed Apr 17, 2013 4:51 PM
BigAl, its the site. It just deleates comments from time to time. No censoring involved. You should re-post them, as I have to disagree with John on this one too. John is one of my libertarian heros, but he didn't do his due dilligance this time. The post office is being screwed by the government. It is required to pre-fund its retirement 75 years in advance. Thats why its in the red. Without the pre-funding, the post office would be turning a profit. Hardly anyone knows that fact, but I thought John would. He has a knack for digging up things like that. Also, the post office is REQUIRED by the Constitution.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:22 AM
This will be the third time I've posted this.
You must own stock in UPS because your editorial is missing considerable facts. Want to send your Mom a Mother's Day card? You'll have to take it to the UPS store and it will cost you at least $5.00 to send it across town - more if it's out of town. The USPS will pick it up at your house and deliver it across the country for $0.46. UPS delivers 300 pieces a minute - the USPS delivers over 366 THOUSAND pieces a minute, and neither the UPS or FedEx have the manpower, equipment, or facilities to handle that type and amount of mail. The USPS lost 16 billion, you forgot to mention that most of that loss was due to a congressional mandate to pre-fund 100% of retiree health care premiums for employees that have not even been born yet. Neither the UPS or FedEx pre-fund 100% for their current employees, let alone future ones. Gas prices go up, UPS and FedEx raise the surcharge for their deliveries immediately. The USPS can only raise rates by the rate of inflation and only with the PRC's approval. You talk about profit but the USPS as an Independent Agency of the Executive Branch is limited by law to operate under a break even model. And with all it's problems it still manages to generate more revenue than either UPS or FedEx.
Comment: #3
Posted by: BigAl
Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:38 PM
Re: BigAl Go for it BigAl! You got it, Stossel is lost in the world of business and goverment!
Comment: #4
Posted by: Charles Callaway
Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:09 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
John Stossel
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Star ParkerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 10 Feb 2016

15 Oct 2014 Crumbling Constitution

25 Feb 2015 Kochs and Unions

4 Jul 2007 Live and Let Live