creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Jim Hightower
Jim Hightower
23 May 2012
Snarling Banks

We're sick and tired of being bullied and stomped on by the Powers That Be in Washington, and by gollies, we'… Read More.

16 May 2012
Anheuser-Busch, Drunk on Greed

Big brewers like Anheuser-Busch frequently admonish us imbibers of their grain products to "drink responsibly.… Read More.

9 May 2012
Making Chemical Giants Happy at Our Expense

Thanks to the blessings of nature and good farmers, you and I can enjoy such scrumptious delights as fresh corn-on-the-cob,… Read More.

Turning "Texas Education" Into an Oxymoron

Share Comment

In the good-and-good-for-you department, food scientists are now touting the health benefits of enjoying a handful of nuts every day.

I, for one, am glad, because I love nuts — pecans, hazelnuts, pistachios, almonds, you-name-'em. But my favorite nuts, by far, are the homegrown natives that have taken root in one particularly fertile area of my state: the Texas Board of Education. You just can't get any nuttier than this bunch!

This board, little-known even to us Texans, has lately risen to national notoriety, making our state's educational system a punch line for comedians everywhere. That's because a handful of ultra-right-wing nutcases have taken over this elected overseer of Texas educational policy, and they're hell-bent to supplant classroom education with their own brand of ideological indoctrination.

Their way of achieving this political goal is to rewrite the state standards that textbook publishers must follow to get the lucrative contracts for providing teaching materials for every student in the state, from first grade through high school.

Their latest exercise in ideological correctness comes at the expense of the social studies curriculum. They spent last week going through guidelines for history, government, economics and sociology textbooks, purging references that offend their doctrinaire sensibilities and substituting their own nutty biases and ignorance.

How nutty? Take Thomas Jefferson. They did! They literally did take Jefferson off a list of revolutionary political thinkers from the Enlightenment period, replacing him with a favorite of Christian fundamentalists, John Calvin. Thus, the prime author of our Declaration of Independence — poof — disappeared! Jefferson's unpardonable transgression? He coined the term "separation between church and state."

Any concepts that might spur progressive thoughts in young minds were also expunged. "Justice," for example, was stripped from a list of virtues meant to teach grade-schoolers the characteristics of good citizenship. No doubt the board majority would love to get its hands on the Pledge of Allegiance's assertion of "justice for all," but luckily, the pledge doesn't come under the members' purview.

Yet.

The nuts were able to strike "responsibility for the common good" from the citizenship characteristics list, however, and they just missed deleting the American ideal of "equality." They also narrowly lost on a vote to impose a new requirement that students be taught that the civil rights movement created "unreasonable expectations," but they did manage to balance the positive impact of Martin Luther King Jr. with an insistence that the "positives" of Joe McCarthy's witch-hunt for commies and of Jefferson Davis' secessionist government also be taught.

Likewise, the full-tilt rightists expelled Delores Huerta, the much-admired farm worker leader, from a list of "good citizenship" models, airily dismissing this courageous champion of justice as a socialist. On the other hand, they mandated that Phyllis Schlafly, the Heritage Foundation and Newt Gingrich's Contract With America be taught as historic icons of a "conservative resurgence" in America.

One especially delicious moment came when the board considered a listing of world leaders who fought political repression. On the list was Archbishop Oscar Romero of El Salvador, who led an indigenous poor people's movement in the 1980s before the country's right-wing death squads assassinated him as he was celebrating mass.

The board cut Romero from the list, declaring that he lacked the stature of such other repression fighters as Gandhi. After all, one board member explained, unlike Gandhi, Romero had not had a movie made about his life, so how important could he've been? But — oops! — there was a popular 1989 feature film called "Romero" about the archbishop's exemplary life. The board was embarrassed, but it axed him anyway.

Words were banned, too. The phrase "democratic societies," for example was replaced by the cumbersome "societies with representative government." And even the term "capitalism" was censored for having a negative connotation. Instead, the board decreed that "free enterprise" be used throughout all social studies courses. In addition, all references to the Age of Enlightenment were dropped, because ... well, because these full-fledged political purists don't want any concept based on reason getting into the heads of our school kids.

Texas education wasn't that great before all this folderal, but these doctrinaire morons are turning "Texas education" into an oxymoron.

To find out more about Jim Hightower, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM

1


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
Are you one of the so-called journalists that didn't know that the American Flag was being raised at Iwo Jima?
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:40 AM
When I was in grade-school, I wanted to be a reporter. I was told that being a reporter was passe. I should endeavor to be a "journalist". A reporter, I was told, only dwells on the facts, and this is boring to readers. A journalist, on the other hand, takes a few of those facts, and "weaves a story around them, so that the readers would be entertained". Even then, I knew that was wrong. They were describing movies and television shows. "Journalism" has gone progressively downhill ever since truth was emasculated. The terminology "Enlightenment" or "Age of Enlightenment" came into use in English during the mid-nineteenth century. Thomas Jefferson was dead, by then. You are a disgrace.
Comment: #2
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:54 AM
"The terminology "Enlightenment" or "Age of Enlightenment" came into use in English during the mid-nineteenth century. Thomas Jefferson was dead, by then. You are a disgrace."

@David Hendricks
It sounds like you are implying that the date at which the term Enlightenment was coined and the Enlightenment period occurred at the same time. As if the Enlightenment could not have occurred until someone came up with a clever name for it.
Before you start hurling insults like disgrace, perhaps you should do a little fact checking. If you had you would have found that the Enlightenment, although named during the nineteenth century, refers to a movement that occurred during the eighteenth century.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Garner
Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:40 PM
Thank you for your intelligence with humor. Texas education was a disgrace before these events. I doubt most of those in favor of these changes has ever read the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, in fact, I doubt most can even read. If they can they can't grasp the meaning. Instead, they blindly follow those who would deceive for their own purpose.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Sherry
Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:23 PM
Enlightenment thinkers reduced religion to those essentials which could only be "rationally" defended, i.e., certain basic moral principles and a few universally held beliefs about God. Aside from these universal principles and beliefs, religions in their particularity were largely banished from the public square. Taken to its logical extreme, the Enlightenment resulted in atheism.
Comment: #5
Posted by: David Henricks
Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:26 PM
@david hendricks--The term "the age of reason" is also used to describe the Enlightenment. It is also the title of a book by the pamphleteer of the American Revolution and deist philsopher Thomas Paine originally published in 1793, Paine loathed organized religion but he also rejected atheism.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Margaret Blough
Sat Mar 27, 2010 6:07 AM
It has to bring rise to the term Texas ignorant. Not stupid just ignorant of historical facts as the rest of the nation sees them.

This whole Texas mess argues for national standards for teaching civics.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Michael Valentine
Sun Mar 28, 2010 12:04 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Jim Hightower
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

2 Sep 2009 Holding Wall Street Bankers Accountable

4 Jun 2008 McCain Walks With Gramm

3 Nov 2010 Who's That Hiding Behind the Tea Party?