creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Jamie Stiehm
Past and Present
12 Dec 2014
The California Lady Lights the Dark: Private and Public

WASHINGTON — Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat, could not be bullied by the dark CIA. … Read More.

5 Dec 2014
A Rare Chance for a Woman to Rise on the Big Screen

As "Wild" goes into wide release, a sacred Hollywood idea will be put to the test — and, hopefully, it … Read More.

27 Nov 2014
Whose Side Are You On?

"Whose side are you on?" The protest song feels fresh again as we stare across jagged divides that separate … Read More.

A Young Dove of Peace Flies In the Face of the Taliban

Comment

SANTA MONICA — A young dove of peace with dreams in her eyes almost got shot down.

A schoolgirl named Malala has lessons for us all. She's just joined the rare company of female winners of the Nobel Peace Prize. Malala Yousafzai, a champion for girls' education, was shot and almost slain for speaking out in her country, Pakistan.

We know her as "Malala." The Pakistani girl is also the youngest Peace laureate since the Nobel Prize was first awarded in 1901.

Just days after the world's eyes were on Malala receiving the Prize, the Pakistani Taliban struck again. Evil is here to stay a while. The Taliban staged a nightmarish scene of a school massacre that claimed the lives of about 150 students and staffers at an army school in Peshawar. The Taliban described killing children as retaliation against the nation's military in Malala's corner of the globe.

My mother Judith Hick Stiehm, wrote "Champions for Peace," a wonderful book about women winners of the Nobel Peace Prize, so I have an expert right here at hand. As she writes, "(Some) are not always successful. Still, these winners are examples. They illustrate what an individual can do, how important a single act can be."

Malala falls in the category of symbolic champion, with much unfinished work ahead, she explained, but Malala is someone who gives the world hope in overcoming oppression.

With excellent timing, Norway's Nobel Committee honored the young dove with dreams for the 2014 Peace Prize just as the world starts the season of wonder. The American soul is troubled from reports of violent policing at home and secret torture abroad. Her bright spirit is just what we need.

Malala's survival from a bullet in the face and inspirational message has resonated with multitudes. In an electrifying acceptance speech in Oslo, Malala noted she stood where Martin Luther King Jr., once stood.

King's philosophy of nonviolent resistance changed our country forever, though he did not live to further peace between nations.

As my mother told me, Malala also made history as only the 16th female singled out for the greatest recognition humanity has to give.

For what is more fundamental — and elusive — to human happiness than peace?

Alfred Nobel, the Swedish industrialist who invented dynamite, believed the 20th century world should point toward more peace congresses, fewer standing armies and greater fraternity among nations. These are the criteria considered by a Norwegian parliamentary committee every year.

Malala paid tribute to joining the august company of Aung San Suu Kyi and 14 other women Peace Prize laureates. Kyi's late father was the symbol of independence for Burma. When he was assassinated, she carried on his legacy for years, symbolizing independence even under house arrest. She left her family in England behind. She is now released in a more active official role.

I asked my mother if she could meet any woman winner of the Peace, who would it be?

She replied: Bertha von Suttner. An impoverished Austrian aristocrat, there was no end to her dreams for peace. She even influenced Nobel, a friend of hers, to create the Peace Prize.

"I like Bertha, so energetic and the reason we have a Peace Prize," my mother replied. "She wrote a best-selling anti-war novel, 'Lay Down Your Arms!' and she was an activist for woman suffrage."

My favorite is Jane Addams, a leader in the Women's International League for Peace Freedom. I also enjoy the contrast between the Austrian aristocrat and the Mayan Indian peasant leader for human rights, Rigoberta Menchu, the Kenyan environmentalist Wangari Muta Maathai and the president of Liberia, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.

Let's not forget Barack Obama. By forging diplomatic relations with Cuba anew, after a nearly a half-century of frost, the president is living up to the ideals of the Nobel Peace Prize, which he won in 2009 - widely taken as a rebuke to George Bush for starting the Iraq War.

Peace, sister.

To find out more about Jamie Stiehm, and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Ma'am;... Ignorance is too commonplace to be evil. Intentional ignorance of which we can all boast is very evil. We cannot discount the fact of religious minded people in our government, which constitutionally, because of contitutionally granted privilege, this people cannot prevent- who pushed us into an endless war of tragedy with the Muslims.

Islam is a snake to unbelievers who only make it dangerous by stepping on it. This attack on children as horrible as it is, would not have happened without every death we made possible in fighting the Taliban. Knowledge is no threat to belief, but it is a threat to the power of belief in the minds of humanity. What makes these ignorant people so dangerous is their willingness to pick up the weapons of the West and turn them against us. When it is all said and done, all they will do is return to their hills as hillbillies, and watch the world go by, as certain as every Christian that the wisdom of God stands being the facade of perception as the only reality.

Since our Christains wanted this war more than anybody, let them pay for it and let them fight it. You see that these Christians hate education and knowledge fully as much as the Muslims, but are today contented by gutting the education budgets and managing what can be taught. There was a time in world history when the church was the master or all knowledge. They needed and wanted only as much education as running their organization required. They bought rather more than they bargained for, and once people began to learn enough to learn on their own the cat of knowledge was out of the bag.

There is a reason that the Catholics did not even teach the Bible. They did not want to open that big can of worms. There is a reason the protestants taught people to read, and it was only to teach the Bible, can of worms or not, because they thought with faith all contradictions could be resolved. What everyone found is that educted people turned more to knowledge as a sort of God, and to improvement of ones material condition.

No wonder the religious hate education. Education has a future. Education is the future. And as this country slips into a second class society it is because we have let education languish in the expectation that we are in the end of days. No better reason for keep the religious out of government can be found than in their love of ignorance and hatred of knowledge.

Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Dec 21, 2014 8:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Jamie Stiehm
Dec. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 22 Dec 2014
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Dec 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Dec 2014

18 May 2012 Get Thee to Washington, Women -- San Francisco Will Do, Too

30 Nov 2012 Obama Must Star in Post-election Episode

30 Mar 2012 Washingtonians Occupy Cherry Blossoms for a Cure