opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
12 Feb 2016
David Brooks and Obama's Ongoing Pant Crease

If you read The New York Times "conservative" columnist David Brooks, you might better grasp the chasm … Read More.

9 Feb 2016
Fear Not, My Secular Friends

It amuses me that certain people are convinced that Christians are angry scolds but totally miss the … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
Ted Cruz and the Body of Christ

There is a misplaced fear — shared, I'm sad to say, by many on the right — that Christian … Read More.

Obama's Health Care Duplicity No Longer Debatable


President Obama said, "The package we've put together" will "start bending the cost curve on health care" and "cut the deficit by a trillion dollars." Even a sympathetic Congressional Budget Office has finally put the nail in the coffin of that howler.

At the time Obama made the claim, we all knew it was specious, and study after study came out showing just how fraudulent it was. There was the double counting on Medicare, the "Doc Fix" scam and a host of others. When Rep. Paul Ryan asked the CBO to rescore Obamacare with more accurate assumptions, it didn't quite make the grade — by hundreds of billions of dollars, which, of course, are but rounding errors for the federal spending virtuoso in the White House.

Many of us knew at the time that Obama's drive for socialized medicine had nothing to do with reducing spending — the last thing that is ever on his mind. We knew that it wasn't about increasing access to care — because socialized medicine schemes always ultimately reduce people's access to quality care.

Looked at in a light most favorable to Obama's intentions, it was but another utopian scheme to put everyone on a level playing field. Looked at honestly and realistically, it was a Trojan horse to expand government control over our private lives that would result in less, worse and more expensive care.

No one who has watched Obama and the titanic leftist juggernaut he has unleashed on our beloved America thought he was promoting Obamacare to bend the health care curve down. If that had been the case, he wouldn't have had to go to such lengths to make it appear as though this budget buster was actually a plan for cost containment.

Indeed, we knew he would go to any lengths to pass this bill, even if it ended up costing two or three times more than he falsely projected. And what do you know? Just a few years later, as this legislative Frankenstein awaits the verdict of the Supreme Court, the CBO released a report this week admitting it will cost about twice as much as Obama twisted its arm into calculating a few years ago.

The legislation will not cost $940 billion as originally advertised. It will cost $1.76 trillion, and that is a conservative estimate.

In a word, folks, this is outrageous. If cost were Obama's concern, wouldn't he come before the American people now, admit his error and urge Congress to repeal this ill-conceived monster? How about for the sake of truth in advertising he at least change the name of the law from the "Affordable Care Act" to the "We Can't Afford This Act"?

Betsy McCaughey, a health care expert and a vigorous opponent of Obamacare from the beginning, said that the original cost projections of the plan were "a shell game" and that the CBO's revised report "inches closer to the truth."

This perennially defiant and Alinskyite administration didn't back up at all with these new figures.

Jeanne Lambrew, deputy director of the White House Office of Health Reform, said on the White House blog, "The bottom line is clear: the Affordable Care Act will reduce our deficit, control health costs, and make health care more affordable." Lambrew quoted a pair of consulting firms that said Obamacare would not result in employers dropping their insurance coverage, which is not only untrue but brings us to another major blow Obamacare suffered this week.

The recently released Health Care Reform Survey 2011-2012 of the Willis Group reports, "Survey respondents indicate that into the second year of Health Care Reform implementation, less than 30 percent of employers were able to maintain grandfathered status of their health care plans."

Did you hear that? It's not quite what the White House propaganda blog is telling us. According to Willis, the "rapid loss of grandfathered status far outpaces The Department of Health & Human Services' expectations." The department projected that 78 percent of employers would retain their grandfathered status by the end of 2011, that 62 percent would by the end of 2012 and that 49 percent would by the end of 2013.

Opponents warned this would happen, and disingenuous supporters of the bill ridiculed their warnings as partisan fear-mongering. But the facts are sometimes a disturbing inconvenience. Willis says that the accelerated loss of grandfathered status "suggests that employers have had to make many plan changes to offset cost increases," and employers have likely chosen to forfeit their grandfathered status to control costs.

These are purely scandalous developments, and as one of my friends remarked, in saner times this would spell Obama's political end. Indeed, it would guarantee a Democratic primary challenge.

It would have been bad enough had Obama told us he was hellbent on establishing socialized medicine, even if it would cost the country more and result in people's losing their choice of plans. But he didn't, and he ought to be held to account — politically — for his duplicity.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book, "Crimes Against Liberty," was No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction for its first two weeks. Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



5 Comments | Post Comment
Congress has the purse strings, right? So we've always been told. Tea Partiers vote in a boatload of republicans to Congress in 2010. Does this group vote to defund Obamacare? No. Instead we see mischief such as HR3523, the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011, by Rep. Mike J. Rogers, R-Michigan. Don't tell me how bad Obama is, we've known that for 3 years. Talk about what traitors the republican congress is; how they spend their time not demanding budgets, not ending stupid wars overseas, not defunding idiotic healthcare schemes, rather sponsoring bills like HR3523. The republican congress should now be held to account for their duplicity.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Tom
Thu Mar 15, 2012 12:22 PM
Don't be so sure its no longer debatable. Even as the overwhelming evidence of obamacare's evils and unsustailability stack up, liberal shills will always blindly claim that it will work.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:32 AM
David, I have to disagree with you on one thing, this is a utopian scheme to level the playing field for everyone but the politicians who are dictating our healthcare. The second that corrupt, elitist, lying liberal politicians like Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd, two of the biggest proponents behind Government run healthcare, got sick, they cut the line and went right to the best doctors in the world. That is just how it was in the USSR, everyone was equalibly miserable unless you were a privileged, elitist member of the Communist Party.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Thetruth
Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:49 PM
Re: Thetruth

You are so full of it, they had the same insurance that every other Senator has, there is no line to cut, they went to the best Drs. that were available the same as any other Senator would, or you would if you had those great Federal benefits, or your family was rich. Are you telliing me if you were them, with a brain tumor or some other serious illness that you wouldn't use your great insurance and family money to get the best care?
Give me a break............
Comment: #4
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:07 PM
As usual the whole point of my post went completely over yout head. Dodd and Kennedy were the two biggest proponents of Government run single-payer healthcare which means the Government tells you what you can get treated and which doctors you can see. If you would actually read something outside your bubble, you would learn how it works in counties like England and Canada where you have wait on line to see a Government approved doctor. Do you think Dodd and Kennedy would have waited on that list? Yeah right, those elitist pigs immediately went to the best doctors in the world, cutting ahead of less fortunate people, nothing like not practicing what you preach. Sorry Broom but we fought a war with Great Britain to get rid of the royal privileged class. You may have no problem with a corrupt, elite class making rules for us to live by that they themselves are unwilling to follow but I do.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Thetruth
Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:10 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
David Limbaugh
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 13 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 13 Feb 2016

11 Jul 2011 America's Historical Sites Inspire Us To Fight To Preserve Our Liberty

29 Dec 2011 Blind to Their Liberal Biases

13 Apr 2007 Iraq Burns While Dems Fiddle