opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
24 Feb 2015
The Media's Slimy Assault on Gov. Walker

I'm not sure which is more absurd, for the media to be up in arms about former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's … Read More.

20 Feb 2015
Obama the Unwitting Recruiter

President Obama seems more interested in defending the religion of Islam than in defending the United States … Read More.

13 Feb 2015
Obama's Cynical Web of Deceit on Same-Sex Marriage

I am not surprised that President Obama lied to the nation in 2008 when he told us he opposed same-sex marriage,… Read More.

Obama's Highhanded Immigration Hypocrisy


Honestly, are any of my Democratic friends even slightly bothered by President Obama's habitual and brazen lawlessness and what that could mean for our liberties?

Does it bother them that he implemented two new administration programs to halt deportations and allow work permits for up to 5 million immigrants living illegally in the United States after clearly admitting he didn't have the constitutional authority to do so?

Does it bother them that after having done so, despite his insincere promise, he has been openly defiant about the decision U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen made in favor of the states trying to block Obama's unlawful act? Obama said: "This is just one federal judge. We have appealed it very aggressively. ... I'm using all of the legal power vested in me in order to solve this problem." Me, me, me.

Does it bother them that his administration has begun to refer to these immigrants as "Americans-in-waiting" — as if his iron will controls, irrespective of the Constitution, the law and the prerogative of the coequal legislative branch?

Does it bother them that, like a Third World despot tyrannizing his subjects, he said in a town hall forum in Miami that there will be consequences for any federal agents who ignore his new policies? Obama said, "If somebody's working for (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) ... and they don't follow the policy, there are going to be consequences to it."

Are such threatened consequences, by the way, really the business of a chief executive, even if he is acting lawfully? Isn't his indignation a bit tough to take, given his own propensity not to follow the law? Does anyone ever make him face consequences for not just ignoring but violating laws?

As others have pointed out, Obama's position on this issue, despite being legally wrong, is inconsistent. His entire rationale is that these actions are within his executive power because it is a matter of prioritizing immigration enforcement efforts with limited congressional funding. Yet he will have zero tolerance for immigration officials who attempt to exercise their discretion in not enforcing his "orders."

Also, Obama's characterization of his executive action as a matter of prosecutorial discretion is disingenuous. Judge Hanen clearly held that Obama's program of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents is "actually affirmative action rather than inaction" because the program grants "legal presence to individuals Congress has deemed deportable or removable, as well as the ability to obtain Social Security numbers, work authorization permits, and the ability to travel."

It is absurd for Obama to claim that his action is within his prosecutorial discretion when it not only involves a decision not to enforce a law or ruling but also grants new rights, as Hanen noted, and is in contravention of existing laws.

As Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has argued, "the president, on his own, has issued a separate action in opposition to current law." This action, says Paxton, will cost his state hundreds of millions of dollars for education, health care and public safety.

Do you understand the argument? Obama isn't just turning his back on deportment. He is granting substantive rights to immigrants that are not his to grant, foisting the cost of those new rights onto the states without their consent — and doing so in violation of existing laws.

The administration's duplicity is readily apparent when you listen to the weasel words of Sarah Saldana, director of ICE, in the emergency motion filed by the Obama administration to stay Hanen's ruling. Saldana said, "Preventing the deferred action policies from going into effect interferes with the Federal Government's comprehensive strategy for enforcing our immigration laws."

Do those words, on their face, make sense? How does preventing Obama's newly granted affirmative privileges to these immigrants from taking effect interfere with the government's strategy for enforcing its immigration laws? Isn't it more accurate and honest to say that it interferes with Obama's attempt not to enforce those laws and to grant affirmative rights to immigrants that Obama decidedly has no authority to grant as president?

An action does not become something it is not just because government officials describe or denominate it as such. Otherwise, the Affordable Care Act would not be raising health care costs for millions of American families, and Obama's scheme to commandeer the Internet wouldn't be called "net neutrality." Obama's illegal immigration actions are not within his executive authority merely because he depicts them as within his prosecutorial discretion.

Obama's arrogance may cost him this time, as he has gone way too far, even for him, by flagrantly violating the separation of powers and exceeding his executive authority in granting new rights to immigrants who are here illegally, providing no notice to the states of his action to allow for public feedback and saddling the states with enormous financial burdens.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book is "Jesus on Trial: A Lawyer Affirms the Truth of the Gospel." Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... Two things... You haven't got any friends democrat or otherwise, and to say you do is pure posturing. You are a windbag without the bag, and while you find it profitable to be used and use others in return you do not have the honor essential to friendship, or citizenship.
Mr. Obama is right; and that is just one judge, and if it is a republican judge they are a dime a dozen and already sold on all the failed principals that republicans hold dear, which means: he could have signed his decision with rubber stamp having the same sense as himself. The president has the right to act if the congress will not. The president does not have the right to act where the congress has expressed its will clearly. The government and this people have a problem and no one in congress is working too hard on a solution. Mr. Obama does have an emergancy, and emergancy powers. Very little he does with emergancy powers will stand the test of time. Everything Loncoln did with Emergancy powers during the Civil War was overturned, and not because they were found unnecessary, but because peace found they were no longer necessary. Get on the back of your so called republican friends to work on this issue, and I am sure the Court as a republican puppet will back them up.
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Feb 26, 2015 3:09 PM
Nature abhors a vacuum. Just as Limbaugh shows here he have nothing worth saying, the Repubicans have done nothing on immigration even when they could.When George Bush 2 poked his head out of his turtle shell and said something useful on immigration he was slammed by his own party.A rare bit of leadership from George but as we see he caved in and his nerve vanished.So much for the tough guy.Obama acts because Congress does nothing.Whose fault is that?
Comment: #2
Thu Feb 26, 2015 4:47 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
David Limbaugh
Feb. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 2 Mar 2015
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 28 Feb 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 28 Feb 2015

17 Feb 2009 Uncanny, Disturbing Historical Parallels

16 Jul 2010 Obama, Not the 'Post-' but the 'Most' Racial President

25 Mar 2014 There's Nothing Live-and-Let-Live About the Orwellian Pro-Abortion Left