Thelma and Louise Every single day, I get emails from readers asking me if they are being paid the correct amount in their Social Security benefits. I am often tempted to write back and say: "How in the world would I know? I don't have access to your Social Security …Read more. Social Security's Death Benefit I've received several emails in the past week or so about Social Security's one-time $255 death benefit. As part of my response, I told each correspondent that I had addressed their issues in a recent column. But later, I checked and learned the …Read more. Social Security Benefits Outside the US I've been saving up some questions from readers who either live, or plan to live, outside the United States. Of course, all of their questions have to do with their eligibility for Social Security benefits. Before I go any further, I am going to …Read more. Full Retirement Age Q: You continually refer to people getting full benefits at age 66. But you should know that for lots of readers of your column, our full retirement age is greater than age 66. For example, I will have to be 66 and 6 months to get my full benefits. …Read more.more articles
More About Social Security Maximizing Strategies
As I've said many times before, there is no single Social Security topic I hear about more often than the current craze to maximize one's Social Security benefits. Easily, 75 percent of the emails I get deal with this one issue alone.
And this week, I received a couple emails that distressed me. They came from folks who have gone to their local Social Security offices demanding to initiate some Social Security maximizing strategy they claimed they have learned from my column. But the trouble is, they misunderstood something I wrote and are trying to do something they simply can't do. Some have gone so far as to file appeals with Social Security alleging, "Tom Margenau said I can do this!" One Social Security official told me they refer to these as "frivolous Margenau cases."
I have written MANY past columns discussing these maximizing strategies. But obviously it's time to trot out the explanations one more time.
There are two basic strategies. One is called "file and suspend." The other I've taken to calling "file and restrict." But the more technical term the Social Security Administration would use is "restricting the scope of your application to spousal benefits."
To understand the strategies, you first need to grasp some basic program policies. The first policy says that any Social Security claim filed before full retirement age is an open, or unrestricted, application. In other words, if you file for Social Security before FRA, you must file for any and all benefits you are potentially due, both on your record and on a spouse's account. This usually means that you can NOT file for reduced benefits on a spouse's Social Security record and then later file for full benefits on your own record. Conversely, you can NOT file for reduced retirement benefits on your own record and later switch to full benefits on a spouse's record — unless your spouse is not yet getting Social Security at the time you apply for your own reduced retirement (By the way, this unrestricted application rule does NOT apply to benefits for widows and widowers.)
The second basic Social Security policy says that if you wait until your full retirement age to file for benefits, the first policy explained in the prior paragraph goes out the window. In other words, at age 66, you can file for one benefit and later — usually at age 70 — switch to higher benefits.
How you accomplish this almost always involves employing one of the aforementioned strategies: file and suspend or file and restrict. And that phrase "employ one of the ... strategies" is one key to understanding the main point of this column: you can use one or the other strategy. You can NOT use both. (Many of the aforementioned squabbles people have been having with their local Social Security office involve folks trying to employ both strategies.)
The term "file and suspend" means that you file for benefits at age 66 and then immediately suspend your payments.
If a spouse isn't in the picture but you plan to wait until 70 to get the bonus, you can still file at age 66 and suspend your benefits. You would do that just in case something happens between age 66 and 70 and you decide to start your benefits before your 70th birthday. You would then have the choice of getting a pro-rated bonus added to your monthly checks, or claiming retroactive benefits to age 66 at the full retirement rate. Had you not "filed and suspended" at age 66, your only option would be to simply file for your benefits and have them begin effective with your filing date. You would not have the option of taking full retroactive benefits.
The "file and restrict" strategy is used when you have a spouse already getting benefits. At age 66, (and again, waiting until age 66 is the key), you can file for benefits on your spouse's record (that's called "restricting the scope of your application") and collect those benefits until age 70 when you would switch to 132 percent of your retirement rate.
I apparently can't repeat often enough that you can NOT employ both strategies. I will give a quick example. Tom is age 66. He wants to delay taking his own Social Security benefits until age 70. His wife, Becky, is 61 and plans to retire at age 62. She is potentially due a much smaller Social Security benefit than her husband. Tom has two Social Security maximizing options.
Option 1: He can "file and suspend" at age 66. Then when his wife turns 62, she can file for her own reduced benefits and claim any extra spousal benefits she is due on Tom's record even while his benefits are in suspense.
Option 2: He can do nothing at age 66, but wait a year until his wife is 62 years old. After Becky files for her own reduced retirement benefits, Tom can "file and restrict." He would file for husband's benefits on Becky's record, getting an amount equal to one half of her age-66 rate (even though she took reduced retirement benefits). Then at age 70, he would file for his own retirement benefits and claim 132 percent of his own rate. And at that time, Becky could then file for wife's benefits on Tom's record to supplement her own reduced benefits.
Tom will have to dig out a calculator and "run the numbers" to figure out which way to go. My educated guess is option two is the most lucrative.
But to repeat one final time: he can NOT start out with option one and later switch to option two.
To learn more about these strategies, send me an email asking for my fact sheet, "When to take your Social Security benefits." I charge a small fee ($5) for the fact sheet, which I will explain when you send your email.
If you have a Social Security question, Tom Margenau has the answer. Contact him at firstname.lastname@example.org. To find out more about Tom Margenau and to read past columns and see features from other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM