creators home lifestyle web
tom margenau


Explaining Reduced Benefits Q: In a recent column, you said that if you took reduced benefits on your own Social Security record, you could not later switch to full benefits on a spouse's Social Security record. Yet I just did that. I signed up for my own Social Security when …Read more. Men Concerned About Size Q: I am 62 years old and really worried. My whole life, I've always paid the maximum into Social Security. But now these last several years before I retire, I don't think I will quite earn a high enough salary to reach the maximum payment. I am …Read more. This Loophole Should Be Closed Q: I am a lawyer who is still working. I currently make about $250,000 per year. My income has always been high, so I will get the maximum Social Security benefit when I turn 66 in a few months. I was married to my first wife for 15 years, but we …Read more. January Often the Best Month to File for Social Security I write a column similar to this one about this time every year. But I don't mind plagiarizing myself because it contains a very important message for people planning to retire in 2015. January is a critical month for the hundreds of thousands of …Read more.
more articles

Dealing With the Social Security Administration


Q: I've got a beef with Social Security. I barged into my local Social Security office, waited for a couple hours, and finally left. Then I tried calling their 800 number and after being on hold for a half hour, I just hung up. So I've decided to go right to the top. Can you please give me the address for the Social Security Administration headquarters and the name of their top person? I am going to pay him a visit!

A: Well, I will start out answering your questions. But then I am going to tell you why your plan is a bad idea.

The "top person," or the commissioner of Social Security, is a "her," not a "him." Her name is Carolyn Colvin. Actually, she is the "acting" commissioner — and has been for several years now. As with so many of President Obama's appointees to high-level government posts, her nomination to be the official head of SSA has been held up by the Republicans in Congress for a very long time. In fact, I recently read a news story that said they will not name her as the official commissioner of Social Security until she straightens out the mess involving backlogged hearings for Social Security disability benefits. So I've got a hunch she has bigger things to worry about than listening to your "beef."

Anyway, if you insist on paying her a visit, the address is 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235. But I'll let you in on two little secrets. First, you'll have to get in line. And second, you won't get anywhere near the commissioner's office!

I used to work at SSA's headquarters at the very address I gave you. In fact, I worked directly for the then commissioner of Social Security. (This was about 20 years ago.) As someone who had grown up within the agency working in local Social Security field offices around the country before transferring to the head office, I was surprised to learn of the number of people who showed up at the those Baltimore offices each day demanding to "see the big boss." In fact, there were so many they had set up a procedure for handling them. Visitors were ushered into a nice looking office where they met with a representative of the commissioner. But the person they were actually talking to was just an agent from one of the local Baltimore area Social Security field offices. The visitor's problem was usually taken care of, and he or she left satisfied that they had "gone to the top." Of course, the problem would have been just as easily resolved had the person dealt with his or her local Social Security office.

So that's my message to you. Think of it this way. If you have a problem with a washing machine you bought from Sears, would you go to Sears' headquarters and demand to speak to the chairman of the board to get it fixed? Of course not.

You would contact someone at your nearest Sears store or service center.

Similarly, if you have a "beef" with Social Security, try to get it taken care of locally. And I'll spend the rest of this column giving you some tips for doing that.

First of all, don't barge into your local Social Security office. Call first. You can reach SSA at 800-772-1213. A few weeks ago, I gave some tips for doing that.

Essentially, my message was this: Call late — as in late in the day; late in the week; and late in the month (assuming your situation can wait that long). Those are the times when you will have a better chance of quickly getting through to a real person.

Once you reach someone, you may be able to resolve your problem over the phone. If not, you can make an appointment to talk to someone at your local Social Security office. Once you are in an office, there are two main classifications of employees. There are claims representatives who are there to help you file a claim for Social Security benefits. And then there are service representatives whose job it is to handle any post-entitlement issues — like changes to your account or problems with your Social Security checks.

I've also mentioned in this column before that if you have concerns about whichever representative you are dealing with, or if you are uncomfortable with the answers he or she is giving you, ask to speak to a supervisor.

If you are having ongoing problems with SSA that you simply have not been able to resolve by dealing with local Social Security officials, then I suggest getting your local congressional representative involved. Each member of Congress has someone on his or her staff who deals with Social Security matters. That person will usually contact the manager of your local Social Security office. I can tell you from experience that when a Social Security office manager gets a congressional inquiry, the case in question usually gets moved to the top of someone's pile.

I also must point out that if your "beef" involves a letter that SSA sent you — maybe informing you of a change in your benefits or telling you that you have been overpaid and must refund some money to SSA — then you should file a formal appeal.

Every one of those letters includes a paragraph telling you what to do if you disagree with whatever action is being proposed. You usually have 60 days to request a review of your case. Filing such an appeal, and thus keeping your legal options open, is a whole lot better than barging into a local office or trying to take your beef to the top!

If you have a Social Security question, Tom Margenau has the answer. Contact him at To find out more about Tom Margenau and to read past columns and see features from other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at



3 Comments | Post Comment
Tom, I can understand people getting so upset at Social Security when trying to discuss or fix an issue but why don't they understand it is our Congress' fault. They keep cutting funding for the Social Security Administration (SSA) but then dump more stuff on them to do like monitoring "Obamacare". Some Congressmen/women even have the gall to complain about the poor job the SSA is doing to get on TV! I wish we could just get rid of ALL the current members of Congress and start over!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Daniel Jagow
Wed Jan 28, 2015 7:25 AM
Locally the Social Security Offices have cut their office hours closing at 3:00 pm for them to catch up on backlog stuff. I do not think Tom was taking the seriousness of the man's issues. I have witnessed the lengthy holds and lines at Social Security Offices. Some people do not have enough minutes on their cell phones to hold for 2 hours. Some people need and immediate answer, as they have to plan for their bills, if their benefits are cut. Some issues need to urgently handled. Filing for your first time Social Security Retirement is probably not and urgent issue. Someone suddenly, severely disabled with a life change, may need more urgent attention to get in line for disability line wait. Someone who has suddenly died, and the beneficiaries are trying to sort things out.....urgent to me. I think there could be a middle man. As for going to your Congressman, I would rather see them in Washington, DC accomplishing something than handling someone's personal complaint!
Comment: #2
Posted by: SUNRISE
Wed Jan 28, 2015 12:04 PM

Your representative is actually not the one who would handle these complaints even if you snail mailed or emailed the representative. They have staff to handle these things for them. In fact, they are given a tax-payer funded budget to pay for staff-members many whose sole jobs are to handle stuff like this. I went to my congressman and senators when my G.I. Bill benefits were not being paid on time and my college was trying to send my account to a collections agency. Well guess what I got swift resolution and the local VA office never let my university account go unpaid ever again. This is one of the ways that our congress members are able to keep a handle on what is going on back home while they are away from their districts. You pay their salaries why not expect them to do something in return. Military compensation and Veteran's Administration issues are important issues in DC recently this keeps them informed of problems in the system locally. If enough constituents of his fellow constituents are having the same problems with the local SSA notifying the representative of this fact, the representative is the one who can get something done.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Paula
Sat Jan 31, 2015 5:15 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Tom Margenau
Jan. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month