creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Susan Estrich
15 May 2013
Benghazi and Lewinsky

On its face, the murder of Americans in Libya, including our ambassador, has absolutely nothing to do with … Read More.

10 May 2013
Mother Love

My daughter was born on Mother's Day, 23 years ago. It was the happiest day of my life — matched only, … Read More.

8 May 2013
The Drunk Guy in the Parking Lot

The report from the Arlington, Va., Police Department is, on its face, hardly newsworthy: "SEXUAL BATTERY,… Read More.

Playing Nice

Comment

"We'd rather not win than to have to do that," Cindy McCain told Ann Curry of the "Today" show, in response to a question about negative campaigning. "That's not worth winning for. This is about being a leader and a person that can be a good example for our children, and a good role model. There's many, many, many more things to this job than just being the president. You are an example. You have to — you have to be better than that. You have to be."

Cindy McCain is, by all reports, a very nice woman, who has dealt with her share of issues — a stroke in her 40s, addiction to prescription painkillers, not to mention the trials and tribulations of raising four children, including two sons who are now in the military and an adopted daughter from Bangladesh. She has endured rumors and speculation (on the front page of a recent edition of The New York Times) about her husband having an extramarital affair with a blonde lobbyist, and even, during the vicious 2000 campaign, his having fathered an illegitimate child. She is rich and files her taxes separately, which has led many people to challenge her right to keep those returns private. Her husband was married to someone else when they met. Yada, yada. If anyone knows how ugly it can get out there, it is Mrs. McCain.

She is also a USC graduate, a fellow Trojan (that's where I teach), which earns her even more points in my book.

So I believe her when she says she doesn't want this to be a negative campaign. I believe she believes it's not worth winning if that's the way you have to do it.

I just don't believe that is the way her husband's friends and supporters will see it.

There is an ugly tradition that has developed in politics in recent years, aided and abetted by the rules and exceptions that govern the financing of campaigns.

The candidate stays clean.

Other people do the dirty work. Then the candidate is "shocked, shocked" to discover there is gambling in Casablanca, and that it is beyond his control.

And the media play right along, letting him get away with it, repeating the ugly ads, reporting that they were financed by someone else, parroting his expression of shock and concern amid the knowing winks from so-called wrongdoers who can't be stopped because they are, as they must be under the law, "independent" of the campaign.

The only way to stop negative — and what I really mean is dirty — campaigns is for the candidates to say they will take personal responsibility for what is said by those who support them, for the advertisements run on their behalf, for those who work for them, as well as those who conveniently claim their independence.

And it is up to the media to enforce that standard of responsibility by making clear in advance that they will view the so-called independent "527" groups as the arms of the campaigns that they really are and expect the candidates to exercise the control that they could if they wanted to.

Is Cindy McCain going to "swift boat" her husband's Democratic opponent? Is she going to have anything to do with dirty ads, appeals to base instincts, slinging mud knowing that some of it always sticks? Absolutely not. This is a woman who didn't want her husband ever to run for president after what they went through in 2000. She knows this stuff hurts. She knows it can be ugly and vicious and full of lies. She won't do it. Problem is, she doesn't have to. That's what friends are for.

To find out more about Susan Estrich and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

9 Comments | Post Comment
A major problem to me is defining negative campaigning. If I say that candidate x has an economic plan that is poorly thought out, is that OK. What if I say that candidate x's economic plan could only have been devised by a moron? Is that negative. One man's negative attack is another man's justifiable crticism.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Dave Kidd
Fri May 9, 2008 7:16 AM
How can you support Clinton and be at all critical of "dirty politics." Even most other Democrats realize she and bubba play dirty.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom Stine
Fri May 9, 2008 7:30 AM
Susan, You just did what you claim the republicans will do. In this writing you were able to put in all the negatives and try to make it look positive for Mrs. McCain.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Kathaleen McCausland
Fri May 9, 2008 3:50 PM
Ms. Estrich,
Kathaleen's post is correct. You shouldn't expend what little good will capital you have left. Your intent was so transparent here. Do you really think it is right to smear Cindy McCain? Does it help your cause? Have you people no decency?
Comment: #4
Posted by: j zarynski
Mon May 12, 2008 7:31 AM
This is so mean spirited. Mrs. McCain seems to be a decent lady why imply that she will allow nasty capmaign tactics while hiding behind a retoric of civility? This is exactly the type of nasty stuff we have seen too much of. Lets stick to issues and stop attacking individuals.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Robert Klein
Mon May 12, 2008 9:39 AM
BS!!!!!!! Will you hold Obama accountable for the commercials of MoveOn.Org? I don't recall you screaming when N.A.A.C.P. accused Bush of allowing the black man to be dragged to death behing the truck. There are groups that do not like McCain one bit, and they will still run attack ads on Obama. What should McCain do about this? He has already denounced the folks in North Carolina. It didn't stop.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Paul Graham
Tue May 13, 2008 10:37 AM
I think I'm in concert with most of the other postings. Your criticism of negative campaigning was not surprisingly absent of any reference to negative stuff from the Left, who DOMNATE the 527's. Code Pink, MoveOn, etc. etc. etc. Come on, Susan. Get your head out of the sand.
Comment: #7
Posted by: cougartrumpetdude
Wed May 14, 2008 10:10 AM
Dear Susan
I am cofused regarding your position in this campaing, even as a joke it is bizarre to compare Hillary Clinton with Hitler and for you to pay attention to this aberration. It is sad and a shame how many women had silenced their consciences without denouncing the misogynist media who had spilled all their venom with unparaleled vengance against Hillary Clinton, there are not more virulent antirational epithets in the american language that the media did not use against Mrs Clinton. Never in the history of this country a candidate had been viciously vilified,calumniated with untrue criticism, to add insult to injure, the women journalist had been the worst offenders.On the contrary the media had been spell bounded,mesmerized by Mr Obama , the annoited had been trated like a sacred cow, they had placed him so high in a pedestal that even the petal of a rose had touched him.
I hope that american people will relice about the sinister intention of the media, to nominate Mr Obama because He is an easy target in the hands of the republicans.

Comment: #8
Posted by: yolanda lalama
Thu May 15, 2008 8:14 AM
To say that Mrs. McCain is simply nice and won't engage in negative campaigning is simply wrong. What about her negative attitude toward Mrs. Obama regarding being proud to be an American. It was snide, uncalled for, and in poor taste. This is not simply a nice person.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Gary Tschantz
Sun May 18, 2008 1:53 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Susan Estrich
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013
Robert Scheer
Robert ScheerUpdated 14 May 2013

7 Mar 2007 The Sad Case of Scooter Libby

7 Jan 2011 Bill Daley

1 Apr 2011 Dear Mr. President: It's Time to Go to Israel