creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Froma Harrop
Froma Harrop
18 Sep 2014
A Rough Month in America for Women

Mark Sanford's heralded engagement to Maria Belen Chapur is apparently over. The rep from South Carolina … Read More.

16 Sep 2014
How Not to Get Your Country Back

The tea party mantra, "I want my country back," resonates with many. The racial undertones can be ugly (as … Read More.

9 Sep 2014
Casinos Just Aren't the Answer

The video for the Bruce Springsteen song "Atlantic City" opens with a scene of the grand Marlborough-Blenheim … Read More.

The Sports Cable Rip-off

Comment

Not long ago, an important New England Patriots game failed to appear on my cable lineup. There was a way to pay extra for it, but the heck with that.

This game was a matter of utter indifference to me, but its absence visited trauma on a gentleman staying at my house. Given the exorbitant totals I was already paying for cable, the least I expected was The Game with which to pacify the maniac stomping across my oak floors.

But here's the kicker. My cable bill was jacked up by the ludicrous amounts sports moguls charge for programming, sums far outstripping those paid for Animal Planet and the other civilian channels.

I had long taken comfort in the belief that I was not enriching the billionaire team owners and their badly behaving ball carriers, hitters and dribblers. I was wrong. Their fortunes come right out of my hide as a cable subscriber.

An average of 40 percent of our basic cable bills goes to pay for sports programming. That does not include the premium sports channels, for which fans are charged extra. Thus, viewers whose interests don't wander far from news, cultural and "lifestyle" offerings are forced to subsidize the sports conglomerates.

Jeffrey McCall, a professor of communications at DePauw University, in Greencastle, Ind., has written on the unfairness of it all. What makes him an especially interesting observer is that he is one of them. He's a sports fan who says he'd give up cable or switch providers if the schedule didn't include ESPN and his regional Fox Sports network.

"I do like to watch certain teams and certain games," he told me.

But McCall considers the cable sports business a consumer rip-off. Consider: ESPN takes $5.50 a month from every cable subscriber's bill.

Cable experts expect that fee to increase to $7 in three years. That's just for basic ESPN, not its other channels.

ESPN would then be raking in $8 billion a year from ordinary cable customers, and that's before it even sells commercials. Owned by Disney, ESPN is the biggest profit center in the entire magic kingdom. How does it get away with charging so much money?

"All these big cable companies don't really have leverage when they negotiate with ESPN," McCall explains. "The sports fans would raise Cain. They are very loyal, and they demand their stuff."

The National Football League, meanwhile, makes over $5 billion selling rights to NBC, CBS, Fox and ESPN. That doesn't include revenues from the NFL Network.

"The NFL, they are a machine," McCall says.

Add the MLB Network, Golf Channel and the rest and the bills pile up real fast.

That doesn't leave the rest of us powerless. We can give up our cable TV. We can. We can.

Huge numbers of Americans are canceling their cable subscriptions. (Many use Netflix, Hulu and other Internet-based services to fill the TV gaps.) Some 300,000 customers bailed in the second quarter of this year alone.

Frankly, I'm itching to join them. Sports guy can go to a bar.

Subscribers in and around Los Angeles have sued Time Warner Cable over the $11 billion it paid for the rights to show Lakers and Dodgers games. Guess to whom that sizable bill would eventually be passed.

The suing consumers want the option of paying only for the channels they watch. The sports fans can pay for theirs.

Media experts predict the court will tell the plaintiffs that no one has to buy cable TV. How right it would be. But also how temporary the situation as fleeing cable customers cause this financial model to collapse. It will be hardball all around.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @fromaharrop. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 THE PROVIDENCE JOURNAL CO.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Life is unfair, so that is really a non-issue. However I do agree; as a guy who couldn't care less about pro sports I would love to have a lower cable bill if there was simply a way of paying for what you want. People, the majority of the US population I suspect, who do relish that sports scene however drive the market so it is what it is. If I can't really deal with it, I guess I will just do without. Doing so would also deprive me of some the countless liberal based news sources and popular cultural media that is rotting our brains much quicker that sports. For instance, CNN isn't tearing up the ratings huh? So I guess pro sports money is helping to support the other programming? Ironic.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Truth never fails
Tue Oct 1, 2013 6:50 AM
It is interesting that when it comes to cable tv Ms. Harrop feels it is unfair and the solution is to not participate in a program she feels doesn't represent her needs. If only she could see how this logic applies to Obamacare. To think that at least a this time Time Warner cant get the IRS to penalize her for choosing not to have cable!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Greg M
Tue Oct 1, 2013 7:04 AM
Nicely done. I tried to find the work you source from Jeffrey McCall, but could not. Can you link, or respond?

I was in Cable TV when one of the largest ripoffs was engineering by Disney/ABC/ESPN, when we were forced to place Disney Channel on Basic Cable, increasing Disney revenue more than 10 times, with the threat that ESPN and ABC channels would have been shut down. Of course, that would have been the demise of our small cable operation, mostly serving small rural communities in the NW, as our subscribers would have instantly fled to Dishes So at gunpoint, we complied.

Roger Ingalls
Comment: #3
Posted by: Roger ingalls
Wed Oct 2, 2013 8:24 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Froma Harrop
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Sep 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 20 Sep 2014
Ted Rall
Ted RallUpdated 19 Sep 2014

15 Apr 2010 Politicians Honoring Their Kind

30 Apr 2009 Man and His Self-Interest

12 Jul 2012 The Worst Financial Scandal Yet?