opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
2 Dec 2015
Can We Learn From Europe?

Earlier this year, my column asked, "Will the West Defend Itself?" I pointed out that America's leftists and … Read More.

25 Nov 2015
Free Speech

Recent events at the University of Missouri, Yale University and some other colleges demonstrate an ongoing … Read More.

18 Nov 2015
Education Disaster

The 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress report, also known as The Nation's Report Card, shows … Read More.

Black Opportunity Destruction


"Do you mean he is taller than me am?" sarcastically barked Dr. Martin Rosenberg, my high school English teacher, to one of the students in our class. The student actually said, "He is taller than me," but Rosenberg was ridiculing the student's grammar. The subject of the elliptical (or understood) verb "am" must be in the subjective case. Thus, the correct form of the sentence is: He is taller than I.

This correction/dressing down of a student, that occasionally included me, occurred during my attendance at North Philadelphia's Benjamin Franklin High School in the early '50s. Franklin was predominantly black; its students were poor or low middle class. On top of that, Franklin had just about the lowest academic standing in the city. All of our teachers, except two or three, were white. Despite the fact that we were poor, most of Franklin's teachers held fairly high standards and expectations.

Today, high standards and expectations, at some schools, would mean trouble for a teacher. Teachers, as pointed out in one teaching program, are encouraged to "Recognize and understand the cultural differences among students from diverse backgrounds, and treat such differences with respect. Intervene immediately, should a fellow student disparage a Black student's culture or language." That means if a black student says, "I be wiff him" or "He axed me a question," teachers shouldn't bother to correct the student's language. What's more, should anyone disparage or laugh at the way the student speaks, the teacher should intervene in his defense. Correcting the student's speech might be deemed as insensitive to diversity at best and racism at worst, leading possibly to a teacher's reprimand, termination and possibly assault.

A teacher's job is to teach and failure to correct a student's speech, just as failure to correct a math error, is a dereliction of duty. You might say, "Williams, Ebonics or black English is part of the cultural roots of black people and to disparage it is racism." That's utter nonsense.

During the 1940s and 1950s, I lived in North Philadelphia's Richard Allen housing project, along with its most famous resident, Bill Cosby. We all were poor or low middle class but no one spoke black English. My wife was the youngest of 10 children. Listening to her brothers and sisters speak, compared to many of her nieces and nephews, you wouldn't believe they were in the same family. The difference has nothing to do with cultural roots of black people. The difference is that parents, teachers and others in authority over youngsters have become less judgmental, politically correct and lazy; therefore, speaking poorly is accepted.

Language is our tool of communication. If a person has poor oral language skills, he's likely to have poor writing, reading and comprehension skills. To my knowledge, there are no books in any field of study written in Ebonics or black English. It is very likely that a person with poor language skills will suffer significant deficits in other areas of academic competence such as mathematics and the sciences. It doesn't mean that the person is unintelligent; it means that he doesn't have all the tools of intelligence. That is what's so insidious about the state of black education today; so many blacks do not have a chance to develop the tools of intelligence. Many might have high native intelligence but come off sounding like a moron.

Black Americans should thank God that non-judgmental, politically correct people weren't around during the early civil rights movement when blacks began breaking discriminatory barriers. Discriminatory employers would have had ready-made excuses not to hire a black as a trolley car motorman, cashier or department store sales clerk.

There are some significant challenges to being judgmental and politically incorrect and insisting on proper language. A professor or teacher can get cursed out by students or parents. A black student who speaks well, carries books and studies can be accused of "acting white" and find himself shunned and assaulted by other students.

I would be interested in hearing the teaching establishment's defense of permitting poor language.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
On your article "Too much is at stake to sway warming advocates", I very much appreciate. I believe this global warming is more hype than fact.

I don't particularly care about the Polar Bears and I heard that the numbers have grown since 1950 (when they outlawed hunting). However, the following web explains the concern:

Comment: #1
Posted by: Martha Klemmer
Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:26 AM
The following is my son's (not mine) response to 'Black Opportunity Destruction". He's a speech therapist in a public school in New England and is, clearly, a 21st century, PC individual -- complete with PC-allowed indelicateness. (He wasn't raised that way!)

A few years older than you, I am in complete agreement with the points in this, and your many, fine articles.

Interesting how attitudes are often generational and how they can flip-flop in just one generation ...

The author completely misses the point. And is very off-base with many of comments.

All dialects are equally complex and should be preserved, as should all aspects of cultural differences.

The point of a classroom however, is to prepare students for a future in academics. The goal is not to prepare a student so that he can converse in his cultural dialect...this facility is learned without instruction by about age 6.
The author is correct that the students need to be taught to converse in a dialect of English that is perceived as academic so that they have the potential to progress without ridicule past high school. This can be done in a respectful way by explaining what "code-switching" is. "Code-switching" is the ability to switch between say, "back-woods-VT-hick-dialect" when you are with you red-neck friends from high-school, and a more academic sounding dialect when you are talking to your boss, or somewhere where sounding like a VT hick may be frowned upon. The inverse is also very important...if someone from the inner city NY who has just finished grad school is unable to "code-switch" back to Black American English when he visits his family and friends at Thanksgiving, he will sound like a giant 'turd.'

It's actually a shame that his and his wife's family was so pretentious that they wouldn't speak the accepted dialect within their neighborhood or at family gatherings. They must have sounded like real elitist jerks.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Don
Wed Feb 10, 2010 1:59 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Walter E. Williams
Dec. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Terence Jeffrey
Terence JeffreyUpdated 2 Dec 2015
Ben Shapiro
Ben ShapiroUpdated 2 Dec 2015
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 2 Dec 2015

16 Jul 2014 Our Unwillingness to Defend Ourselves

1 Aug 2007 Economic Thinking

13 Jan 2010 Global Warming Is a Religion