creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Michael Barone
Michael Barone
21 Nov 2014
Let's Really Reform Immigration -- To Encourage High-Skill Immigrants

"When the facts change, I change my mind," economist John Maynard Keynes said when charged with inconsistency.… Read More.

18 Nov 2014
Where The Polls Were Wrong -- And, Maybe, Why

Were the polls wrong? It's a question asked after every election. Sometimes, as in 1948, the answer seems as … Read More.

14 Nov 2014
Is This the Political Map of the Future?

If you're a political junkie — or at least if you're a conservative political junkie — you've … Read More.

Nobody Is Pushing Thomas Piketty's Policies to Combat Economic Inequality

Comment

Last spring, you may remember, the French economist Thomas Piketty was all the rage in certain enlightened circles. His book "Capital" shot up to the No. 1 spot on bestseller lists, and many economists praised his statistics showing increased income and wealth inequality. Piketty argued that, absent a world war, returns to capital will exceed economic growth, inevitably producing growing inequality in the 21st century.

There are problems with Piketty's — or anyone else's — statistics. Reliance on U.S. income tax returns overlooks the fact that tax cuts encourage people to realize income and misses non-taxable income such as welfare and Social Security payments.

Still, there has clearly been a boom in the incomes and wealth of the top 1 percent here and worldwide. Piketty sees this as a threat to democracy. Liberal economists and pundits hoped that his revelations would finally get politicians to support policies like Piketty's 80 percent tax rate on high incomes and progressive tax on great wealth — and get the masses to vote for them.

So far it hasn't happened here or just about anywhere.

You didn't see any campaign ads calling for Piketty taxes this fall. You didn't even see any ads hailing Democrats for having raised taxes on high earners in early 2013. Democratic candidates in seriously contested races didn't come close to advocating such policies.

You may have heard some Democrats bemoaning income inequality. The idea that the rich get richer while everyone else doesn't gets pretty wide agreement in the polls. So does the Democrats' one redistributionist policy — raising the minimum wage.

As a policy to address inequality, though, it's rather pathetic. About half of minimum wage earners are not in the lowest fifth households in income. Even fewer are their own household's primary earner. Almost all economists agree that when the minimum wage is raised, some employees lose their jobs.

It is only slightly hyperbolic to say that an increased minimum wage is a transfer of income from fast-food customers to fast-food workers minus those who are replaced by kiosks. That's not a very effective way to sock it to the top 1 percent.

Even after the election, some Democrats argue that they didn't hit the issue hard enough.

One Democrat's advice to President Obama, according to Politico, "is focus on income inequality, and talk about and propose things, and just be a fierce advocate of addressing the economic divide. That will leave people after two years saying the Democratic Party really stands for something."

"Propose things" — but what? A recent Congressional Budget Office report shows that when you measure federal taxes paid minus federal transfers received (welfare, food stamps, Social Security, etc.), the top 20 percent of earners pay an average of $46,500. The next 20 percent pay an average of $700. The bottom three-fifths get back more than they pay. Plus, the U.S. already relies more heavily on the income tax for revenues than any other advanced economy nation.

In other words, America already has lots of economic redistribution. American voters evidently sense that more redistribution would sap economic growth. They're willing to throw a little to minimum wage earners, but they don't want to kill the geese laying the golden eggs.

Americans are not alone in feeling that way. You don't see much demand for Piketty policies in other countries either.

Even in Brazil, with near-zero growth and much greater inequality than the U.S., incumbent President Dilma Rousseff saw her percentage slip from 56 percent in 2010 to 52 percent this October.

In Britain, facing an election next May, there are calls within the Labour Party to oust leader Ed Miliband, who has called for freezing energy prices and a tax on "mansions," which would hit Londoners hard.

Piketty confesses he has seldom left Paris in his adult years. But even there his policies are in trouble. The job approval of Socialist President Francois Hollande, who imposed a top income tax rate of 75 percent, currently hovers just above 10 percent.

Politicians opposing massive economic redistribution have a hard time coming up with appealing rhetoric. But there seems to be something more powerful working in their favor — a widespread if unspoken understanding that government attempts to "spread the wealth around" (as candidate Obama once told Joe the Plumber) tend to destroy it instead.

Piketty has sold a lot of books. But his policies don't seem to be selling well anywhere.

Michael Barone, senior political analyst at the Washington Examiner, (www.washingtonexaminer.com), where this article first appeared, is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2014 THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... When Capitalism works, people lose their jobs. More profit is not built on long term relationships, or fair relationships. Getting more work out of less workers is the way to higher profits. The other alternative is to export jobs and capital abroad, but sooner or later the society is drained of wealth so that the wealthy are more presssed to pay to support a shiftless population, or protect their wealth directly, legally or with violence. Ultimately, high profits suck all the wealth from society so that a "correction" become inevitable. High profits are synonymous with glut, meaning: Depression. Without resort to inflation and funny money, the economy would have died long ago.
Look at all Rome did. And legally we are little different. Competition with slaves drove the small free farmers from their fields, and nothing could reverse that trend though some agrarian reformers tried. Wealth was held without social responsibility, then as now, and their democracy was not allowed to function. Even with tyranny, their days were numbered. In the end, free men had nothing to defend, and they cut off their thumbs rather than serve in the military. Production of goods was transfered to the colonies, where it was taxed, but also where it required greater defense. Equal rights of citizenship were not given to the colonies, and in the case of Mauritania, six men owned all of it. Now; I did not write the play book for ancient Rome, but we are certainly following it into decline, and if fortunate will follow it into revolt. But Roman revolt ended in tyranny which never did address the demoralization of a people deprived of their own part in the productive process. Just as we couldn't legally prevent the slaves of the South, defined as property from being relocated in Free States, we cannot stop the export of capital to slave states where we must then compete against slaves. Slaves set our wages, and artificial legal means will not stem the tide for ever increasing slavery in America. And the working poor are slaves. A hand to mouth existence is slavery. Any when it is higher wages that cause people to be laid off you hate high wages. But when it is higher profits that demands more labor from less workers you are all in favor.
Where in your economy is there room for humanity? Do you want to teach the young that labor is worthy, or worthless?
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Nov 25, 2014 5:58 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michael Barone
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 27 Nov 2014
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.Updated 27 Nov 2014
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 26 Nov 2014

6 Jun 2011 Obama Tunes Out, and Business Goes on Hiring Strike

18 Jun 2009 All Politics Is Turnout -- and Enthusiasm Is Key

30 Apr 2009 Specter's Party Switch Is All About Winning