creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
25 May 2012
Obama and Leahy vs. Sir William Blackstone

Has President Obama's disrespectful attitude toward the United States Supreme Court caused a trickledown … Read More.

22 May 2012
Obama's Morbid Vanity

I recently came across Nathaniel Hawthorne's haunting short story "Wakefield," and I couldn't help … Read More.

18 May 2012
It's Not the Same-Sex Marriage, Stupid

People have asked what Obama could possibly have been thinking to announce the final step in his … Read More.

Fascism Is Not Conservatism

Share Comment

Someone recently emailed and asked me to rebut the claim that fascism is a right-wing system.

I have given this question considerable thought over the years; even when I was in college, liberals routinely smeared conservatism as a fascist political ideology. Indeed, how many times have we heard the mantra that communism and Nazism represented the two extremes of the political spectrum, left and right, respectively? This never made sense to me, as I knew that conservatism championed political and economic liberty and that communism and fascism were the direct antithesis of these.

I am thankful that my friend Jonah Goldberg has written the definitive work on this subject and set the record straight, in his scholarly and entertaining "Liberal Fascism." I strongly recommend it.

But let me share some thoughts I've developed over the years as to how the misunderstandings on these terms evolved, points which may or may not be addressed in Jonah's book.

Both communism and Nazism are evil totalitarian systems characterized by enormous power in the central government. It's true that in theory, Karl Marx predicted the eventual withering away of the state and the "dictatorship of the proletariat," when the people would rule, which was sheer fantasy because it was based on grossly erroneous assumptions about human nature, as history would repeatedly demonstrate.

But no one can deny that communism, in practice as well as theory, is a form of socialism, as evidenced, among other things, by the Soviet Union's proud self-identification as a "socialist republic." Likewise, Nazism and fascism, by definition, are socialist systems, with the state owning or controlling the major means of industry and production.

But there are differences in these systems, and I think these differences, along with historical reasons so well chronicled in Jonah's book, contribute to the left's soft identification with one and strong rejection of the other.

Apart from being centralized political systems, Nazism and fascism were nationalistic, patriotic and militaristic. Some have even said they were religious, but I see little authentic evidence of that. The Soviet system was more international in its orientation, being driven less by national fervor and more by world expansion. I'm not disputing that Hitler and Mussolini were expansionist, as indeed they were, but the Soviets were more focused on making communism a global system and diminishing the role of the nation-state in comparison with Nazism and fascism.

But there's something even more telling.

Communism, as conceived by Marx, was based on the perceived class struggle. Marx envisioned that the "workers of the world" would unite against so-called capitalist oppression. Marxism was thoroughly materialistic and rooted in class warfare. Nazism was probably not so virulently anti-capitalist — at least in terms of its ideological emphasis. It was more racially and nationally driven.

So where does that leave us? Well, today's liberals see themselves as champions of the "working man" and enemies of corporate interests and the wealthy. Their political lifeblood is class warfare on behalf of the "working man" (read: labor unions). Redistributionism is at the heart of their philosophy.

When those on the left today call conservatives "fascists" or liken Bush to Hitler, they are betraying their contempt for what they perceive to be excessive nationalism, patriotism and militarism on the part of conservatives. But there's a darker side to their thinking. The left's worst-kept secret is that many liberals believe — or would at least like the electorate to believe — that conservatives are racist. So there you have it. Conservatives are nationalistic, jingoistic and racist. Point, set, match. They're fascists.

But it's as divorced from reality as it is sinister. Conservatives are driven by liberty and a healthy skepticism for centralized government. They aren't enemies of the federal government but believe it ought to be limited in its powers and scope, as contemplated and designed by the Constitution. They are the opposite of racists, aspiring to colorblindness and equality of opportunity and rights for everyone. We will proudly accept, however, the charge that we are nationalistic, patriotic and firm believers in American exceptionalism.

Liberals can definitely identify with communism, as indeed they have through the years, as in their glorification of the Soviet Union in years past and their romanticizing of communist dictators, such as Cuba's Fidel Castro. But they also have far more in common with fascism than conservatives do, given their penchant for centralized governmental power and too much state control over business and industry, as we've seen most strikingly under President Barack Obama.

As political theory and actual practice throughout history demonstrate, both communism and fascism are left-wing political and economic ideologies — as far as they can be from the right wing of the spectrum.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book, "Crimes Against Liberty," was No. 1 on the New York Times best-seller list for nonfiction for its first two weeks. Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at www.DavidLimbaugh.com. To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
Some other things that, while CON-serving, are NOT conservative:

-Biz nihilism, that is franchise slums, sports-porn 'culture and CON-Sumer-ism

-Globalization, which is standardization, destruction of genuine culture everywhere
and on every level, and all this in the service of ---

-EUGENICS ---or its latest 'fave' dis-info cover 'Bio-ethics'. Remember kiddies!
EUGENICS everywhere and always implies, and manifests ---YOU-genocide

-NAFTA ie liquidation of the republic ------and Globalist-RED China set up, sellout and TREASON
Comment: #1
Posted by: free bee
Thu Jul 7, 2011 8:10 PM
There's also the fact that the Nazis and Communists spent the 1920's and early 30's in endless street fights. This probably led to the assumption that their ideologies were polar opposites: if the Commies were the left, then the Nazis were the right... otherwise why were they enemies? It's simplistic logic, but and easy conclusion to reach. To refute: the shia and the sunnis have been killing each other for 1600 years, but they're all muslims, aren't they?
This is also telling: as you say, a major difference between the Nazis and the Communists was that the Communists were internationalists, while the Nazis were German nationalists. Now, what was the actual full name of the Nazi party? It was "Nazionalistische Deutsche Arbiter Partei" (usually abbreviated NSDAP on their banners), or in English: the National Socialist German Worker's Party. Try this thought experiment: delete the two words that distinguish Nazism from Communism, i.e. "National" and "German," and what you have is: "Socialist Worker's Party." How "right" does that sound to you?
Comment: #2
Posted by: Doug
Fri Jul 8, 2011 2:36 AM
The problem with the word conservatism is that is doesn't carry in it's name -that which it desires to conserve, opening itself to these shennaigans. I would prefer that it be called traditional values conservatism -bulky but far less subject to gam-playing by the wordsmiths on the left.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Don L
Fri Jul 8, 2011 4:46 AM
How many of you know that Mussolini started out as a communist? Well, it's true. He simply had smaller scale goals: take over a country, instead of the whole world. Once you know he was a communist turned nationalist, then, quite clearly, the affinity of Nazism to Communism is made clear. The analogy above to the Shia's and the Sunni's is quite apt.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Lino DiBarone
Fri Jul 8, 2011 8:20 AM
How would one label these two types of governmental systems? One where all corporate business exists for the sake of the state, and one where the state exists for the sake of corporate business. While I would be totally opposed to the first, I'm very afraid we are heading for the second. When the person I choose to represent me in government is loyal only to those who throw the most money his way, who then will stand for me? I wonder how many loyal conservatives feel they belong in the group that will most benefit from what appears to be the current agenda of the Republicans?
Comment: #5
Posted by: WildBill
Fri Jul 8, 2011 10:14 AM
The main reason that the American left calls Fascists "right wing" is because that is how the European "
Political spectrum was described in Europe. Therefor anything that was against Communist style socialism was the "opposite" political ideology of Communism. In reality both Communism and Fascism were political expressions of the new ideology of Collectivism that had been discussed since the French Revolution. Since Europe had developed over several thousand years under various centralized authoritarian forms, their entire history and culture was evolved from the concept of collectivism.

America was the first viable alternative to the liberty destroying ideologies, and since our founding the world peer pressure to be more like them has not ceased.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Mark James
Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:19 PM
"Go back a few years to the origin of the terms and see where left or right would take us if we continued far enough in either direction. Stalin. Hitler. One would take us to Communist totalitarianism; the other to the totalitarianism of Hitler."
Ronald Reagan
Remarks Accepting the Presidential Nomination at the Republican National Convention in Dallas, Texas
August 23, 1984
Comment: #7
Posted by: spyder449@yahoo.com
Fri Jul 22, 2011 5:10 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
David Limbaugh
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Oliver North
Oliver NorthUpdated 25 May 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 25 May 2012
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 25 May 2012

2 Dec 2011 Obama Pleads for 4 More

8 Mar 2011 Chicago Politics Targets High Court

6 Jun 2008 The Arrogance of Obama's Leftist Supporters