opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
David Limbaugh
David Limbaugh
18 Nov 2014
Obama Denies Gruber, but Facts Deny Obama

Do President Obama's adamant denials that he misled the American public on various important aspects of … Read More.

14 Nov 2014
GOP Aims to Thwart Obama's Lawless Immigration Plans

It's hard to conceive of a presidential administration more cynical than one that would delay putting off … Read More.

11 Nov 2014
A Smoking Gun for Us 'Stupid American Voters'

Recently, a very disturbing video emerged that contains the metaphorical smoking gun concerning President Obama'… Read More.

Obama's Amnesty Lawlessness Demands Accountability


Time and time again, President Obama demonstrates his contempt for the Constitution and for the American people, whose integrity and will must be subordinated to his personal prerogative and hijacked sovereignty.

Obama has admitted on several occasions that he had no authority to act unilaterally, via executive order, to grant amnesty to millions of immigrants who came here illegally, so his doing so is, in his own opinion, flagrantly illegal.

Daily he proves to us that his words mean nothing. They are utilitarian tools to serve his political purposes. When traveling the country to rally support for the DREAM Act, he confessed that he had no power to pass it on his own, but shortly thereafter, on the heels of his failed efforts to secure sufficient congressional support for this legislation, he issued an executive order implementing provisions of the act anyway.

His action wasn't nuanced or diluted in any way to create even an arguable distinction between his fiat and the provision that Congress explicitly had rejected. Not in the slightest.

It is not as if this lawless dictate, which Obama pretended to issue as an act of compassion, was of minimal consequence. Many have convincingly argued that it led to the southern "border invasion" we experienced a few months ago.

But Obama's current action would go much further — which is hardly surprising, considering that he never seems to be brought to account for his abuses of power. One could say that the recent congressional elections held him to account, but he is doing his best to show that the electorate and the rule of law have no hold on him. He is above the will of the people. He soars above the Constitution. He is a law unto himself.

This executive order could protect up to 5 million people from deportation and possibly grant them work permits. Other than certain fringe Constitution-disrespecting progressive law professors, no one seriously believes that Obama has the authority to do this, even under the rubric of "prosecutorial discretion." Even liberal MSNBC host Lawrence O'Donnell couldn't find a single Democrat who could cite any authority for this act.

In attempting to rationalize every one of Obama's serial outrages, liberal politicians and pundits invariably draw arrows from their bloated moral equivalence quivers. "President Obama is doing nothing other than what Republican presidents have done in the past," they say. "Why didn't you conservatives complain then?"

A number of discriminating writers have conclusively put the lie to this specious claim.

Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush issued executive orders concerning immigration, but their actions were in furtherance of implementing legislation passed by Congress. Obama's order is in direct contravention of Congress' express will on the matter. It was fashioned out of whole cloth, and no amount of leftist spin can change that inconvenient truth.

In seeking to justify the unjustifiable, Obama doesn't just say — dishonestly — Republicans did it first. He makes an even more absurd and equally contemptible argument. He says he really regrets that members of Congress forced his benevolent executive hand on this, for if they had fulfilled their own duty to pass immigration reform legislation, he wouldn't have been compelled to act. So he's issuing the unlawful order under duress — with a legislative gun to his head? Seriously?

Tell me why such Orwellian canards don't disturb rank-and-file Democrats or people in the liberal media who purport to respect the Constitution. Can anyone on the face of the earth point to a single provision in the Constitution that says the principle of separation of powers will be suspended and congressional authority subordinated to that of the president anytime a president, in his sole and absolute discretion, decides such because Congress hasn't yielded to his legislative demands?

Have some among us become so cynical as to believe that our Constitution's framers distributed federal power among three branches and imposed an intricate system of checks and balances as a matter of mere whim? Forbid that abominable thought. This structure, often attributed to French philosopher and lawyer Montesquieu, was believed fundamental to establishing and preserving our individual liberties — perhaps more fundamental than even the very Bill of Rights. In Federalist No. 47, James Madison wrote, "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many, and whether hereditary, self-appointed, or elective, may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny."

Would-be dictators and bullies must be opposed, resisted and defeated. It will not be acceptable for Congress to sit on its hands after Obama's usurpation. It must act not as a matter of partisan competition but on behalf of the Constitution itself and the sovereignty of the American people, which it has a sacred duty to safeguard.

Now that Obama is declaring war on the Constitution and attempting to further emasculate Congress, it must draw and use every weapon in its constitutional arsenal to nullify Obama's action — and to deter future tyrants from following his disgraceful example.

David Limbaugh is a writer, author and attorney. His latest book is "Jesus on Trial: A Lawyer Affirms the Truth of the Gospel." Follow him on Twitter @davidlimbaugh and his website at To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... If it were me, I would rip the Preamble off of the constitution, use that preamble as the beginning of a new Constitution, and trash the rest. It would be easier for a duck to pick corn out of crap than to find anything worthwhile in the old constitution after the Preamble. You are welcome to try, but no one follows that rag anyway; and the most certain proof of a liar is found in the words: Defend the Constitution. Rather, people look to the constitution for defense of their injustice,
The power to find some good in the constitution, and to ignore the rest has always been the power of government. As many people argued in regard to the French Constitution after their Great Revolution: The Constitution is not the document, but IS the people. Our original constitution papered over grave differences which this people later had to fight to resolve. Far greater differences with far graver consequences remained after the war. For the failure of the constitution we have been led once more into disunion, and mutual antipathy. Just as the South before the war claimed the protection of the constitution, you do as well today in defense of injustice as great as chattel slavery. Let the Constitution be Damned, and let this people live, united and free.
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Nov 21, 2014 6:56 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
David Limbaugh
Nov. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 23 Nov 2014
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 22 Nov 2014
Brent Bozell

16 Jul 2010 Obama, Not the 'Post-' but the 'Most' Racial President

30 Jan 2009 Targeting Rush: Saul Alinsky Would Be Proud

22 May 2012 Obama's Morbid Vanity