A number of conservative commentators have rushed to defend President Donald Trump's Mount Rushmore speech. Incensed by press depictions of the speech as "divisive and dark," figures such as Mollie Hemingway and Tom Fitton rode to the president's side, assailing The New York Times as a "leftist propaganda outfit" (Hemingway) and a "leftist advocacy group" (Fitton). "Talking about American greatness is only divisive if you hate America," tweeted the Daily Caller.
Rich Lowry penned a column noting that the president mentioned Martin Luther King Jr. and other African American heroes; that he affirmed America's dedication to "equal opportunity" and that he condemned slavery. "So where's the hate?" Lowry demanded. "Where's the white supremacy?"
This is the problem: People on the right have an anti-racism accusation switch (I could also say twitch) that is easy to activate. I have it myself. There are excellent reasons to be sensitive about false accusations of racism. It's an ugly charge, and, too often, critics on the left smear good faith arguments they disagree with — such as those about preferences or family structure — as hateful and racist. The left has overused the accusation so often (see Romney, McCain, Bush) that it has become a matter of crying wolf.
Nor can it be denied that people who tear down statues of Frederick Douglass (for Heaven's sake!), or suggest that it may be necessary to defenestrate George Washington, or who burn the flag in front of the White House, are ignorant extremists who should be condemned and opposed.
So, let's stipulate that some press reactions to the Mount Rushmore speech were overheated.
But the conservative reflex to resist accusations of racism is worse than misguided in this instance. Why? Because in this case the accusation is not false. It's blatantly, obviously true.
Where is the "white supremacy"? How about the fact that Trump is threatening to veto the National Defense Authorization Act if Congress follows through on plans to rename military installations named after Confederate generals?
This is not a conservative making the case against racial preferences. It is not a reasoned argument about school choice, or welfare reform, or disparate impact. It is straight-up white supremacy. The Confederacy was not the United States of America. It was a whole other country.
So, no, that's not patriotism. It's kind of the opposite.
Trump's defenders claim to believe that he is being accused of racism because he praised America. Love of country is now being tarred as white supremacy, they cry.
Not quite. There is a history here. Trump's racial appeals have a long pedigree — from his Barack Obama birth certificate nonsense, to his refusing for days on end to condemn David Duke, to the "Mexican" judge, to the s-hole countries, to "go back where you came from," to "good people on both sides," to "get that son-of-a-bitch off the field."
Is it the case that so long as Trump does not actually shout "White Power!" from a golf cart, we must forget everything else he has done and said?
Yes, Trump's Mount Rushmore speech lauded American greatness. For some, that immunizes it against criticism. But at a moment of heightened racial tensions, when millions of his fellow citizens feel embattled and betrayed, it's morally obtuse to fail to devote any words of comfort and inclusion toward them. It is not enough to name check Louis Armstrong or Jesse Owens. A president should acknowledge that we have not yet lived up to the "true meaning of (our) creed," and vow to do better. It is especially important to do so on the Fourth of July.
Instead, Trump spoke of American protesters in language usually reserved for foreign enemies:
"They think the American people are weak and soft and submissive. But no, the American people are strong and proud, and they will not allow our country, and all of its values, history, and culture, to be taken from them."
Trump's chosen message on Independence Day was the good news that "I am deploying federal law enforcement to protect our monuments, arrest the rioters, and prosecute offenders to the fullest extent of the law. ... I am pleased to report that yesterday, federal agents arrested the suspected ringleader of the attack on the statue of Andrew Jackson in Washington, D.C., and, in addition, hundreds more have been arrested."
News of arrests is supposed to make patriotic hearts swell with pride?
Leadership of a large diverse nation requires certain grace notes that every president in living memory has found it in his heart to pronounce on important occasions.
This president has chosen and continues to choose division and vitriol.
His critics are right.
Mona Charen is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Her new book is "Sex Matters: How Modern Feminism Lost Touch with Science, Love, and Common Sense." To read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.
Photo credit: ducken99 at Pixabay