creators.com opinion web
Conservative Opinion General Opinion
Alexander Cockburn
Alexander Cockburn
13 Jul 2012
The End of America's Armies

Retired Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, bounced out of his job for revels in Paris as witnessed by Rolling Stone, … Read More.

6 Jul 2012
Epitaph to a Dead Movement

It was very hard not to be swept away by the Occupy movement, which established itself in New York's Zuccotti … Read More.

29 Jun 2012
The Affordable Care Act: Decision Effects

It's tempting to say the Affordable Care Act decision spells the end of the Romney candidacy. The Mormon … Read More.

When Half a Million Americans Died and Nobody Noticed

Comment

Are American lives cheaper than those of the Chinese? It's a question raised by Ron Unz, publisher of The American Conservative, who has just published a compelling comparison between the way the Chinese dealt with one of their drug scandals — melamine in baby formula — and how the U.S. handled the Vioxx disaster.

In September 2004, Merck, one of America's largest pharmaceutical companies, issued a sudden recall of Vioxx, its anti-pain medication widely used to treat arthritis-related ailments.

There was a fair amount of news coverage after the recall, but it was pretty slim considering the alleged 55,000 death toll. A big class-action lawsuit dragged its way through the courts for years, eventually being settled for $4.85 billion in 2007.

Senior FDA officials apologized for their lack of effective oversight and promised to do better in the future. The Vioxx scandal began to sink into the vast marsh of semi-forgotten international pharmaceutical scandals.

The year after Vioxx was pulled from the market, The New York Times and other media outlets ran minor news items, usually down column, noting that American death rates had undergone a striking and completely unexpected decline.

Typical was the headline on a short article that ran in the April 19, 2006, edition of USA Today: "USA Records Largest Drop in Annual Deaths in at Least 60 Years." During that one year, American deaths fell by 50,000 despite the growth in both the size and the age of the nation's population. Government health experts were quoted as being greatly "surprised" and "scratching (their) heads" over this strange anomaly, which was led by a sharp drop in fatal heart attacks.

For his melamine/Vioxx comparison, Unz went back to those 2005 stories. Quick scrutiny of the most recent 15 years worth of national mortality data provided on the U.S. government's Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website offered Unz some useful clues.

"We find the largest rise in American mortality rates occurred in 1999, the year Vioxx was introduced, while the largest drop occurred in 2004, the year it was withdrawn," says Unz.

"Vioxx was almost entirely marketed to the elderly, and these substantial changes in the national death-rate were completely concentrated within the 65-plus population.

"The FDA studies had proven that use of Vioxx led to deaths from cardiovascular diseases such as heart attacks and strokes, and these were exactly the factors driving the changes in national mortality rates."

"Patterns of cause and effect cannot easily be proven," Unz continues. "But if we hypothesize a direct connection between the recall of a class of very popular drugs proven to cause fatal heart attacks and other deadly illnesses with an immediate drop in the national rate of fatal heart attacks and other deadly illnesses, then the statistical implications are quite serious."

Unz makes the point that the users of Vioxx were almost all elderly, and it was not possible to determine whether a particular victim's heart attack had been caused by Vioxx or other factors. But he concludes: "Perhaps 500,000 or more premature American deaths may have resulted from Vioxx (emphasis added), a figure substantially larger than the 3,468 deaths of named individuals acknowledged by Merck during the settlement of its lawsuit. And almost no one among our political or media elites seems to know or care about this possibility."

I remarked to Unz that it seemed truly incredible that a greater than expected death rate of this dimension should scarcely have caused a ripple.

"I'm just as astonished," he said. "One might conjecture that the mainstream media and the government officials were all bribed or intimidated by Merck's lawyers, lobbyists and advertising budget into averting their eyes or holding their tongues. But from 2004 onwards, huge numbers of America's toughest trial lawyers were suing Merck for billions based on Vioxx casualties — didn't they notice the dramatic drop in the national death rate?

"The inescapable conclusion is that in today's world and in the opinion of our own media, American lives are quite cheap, unlike those in China."

Alexander Cockburn is co-editor with Jeffrey St. Clair of the muckraking newsletter CounterPunch. He is also co-author of the new book "Dime's Worth of Difference: Beyond the Lesser of Two Evils," available through www.counterpunch.com. To find out more about Alexander Cockburn and read features by other columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Ok, so there is a strong correlation between the introduction and removal of a drug and a very large number of premature deaths, and there was an underwhelming response to the correlation. What does that have to do with China? You mention how Chinese dealt with melamine in baby formula. You didn't say how Chinese dealt with Melamine in formula. Last I heard little was being done in China on that matter. Perhaps I'm uninformed of the current events on the matter but it would seem that if you were comparing how the two countries reacted you would actually compare them. Instead I have to look up somewhere what actions were taken by the Chinese. What is it that make you conclude that Chinese lives are worth more than American.
By the way there is a significant difference between supplying food with a known poison in it and suppling drugs thought to be helpful in error. There was no way anyone could believe Melamine was helpful. New drugs however can appear promising only to find when introduced that the side effects are more harmful than the illness. As long as the drug manufacturer responds well when the error is found then the event is far less incriminating than poisoning baby formula.
You do make a strong case for an investigation to determine the truth of the situation, I just wish you would have actually compared the response. It reads like your commenting to someone else's article, that I was supposed to have just read rather than originating an article.
C Moellers
Comment: #1
Posted by: C Moellers
Thu Apr 26, 2012 7:37 PM
Life has risk. If we removed the private automobile from the nation's highways, we would save tens of thousands of lives a year, but at what cost? (Okay, perhaps not the best comparison because, typically, drivers are more aware of the risks than Vioxx users were.) I suspect that if we removed ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and other NSAIDS from the market, we would also see a significant drop in the nation's death rate, although the change would likely not be as great as that of Vioxx. (I am told that these drugs have significant risks of cardiac problems under some circumstances - especially for the elderly.) The trade off in increased misery from the users would, however, be huge. I found it interesting that, when the problems became known and the drug was withdrawn, more than a few vioxx users were very upset and said that they would be more than willing to continue using the drug, with full knowledge of the risks, because it provided a level of relief for chronic pain that they had not found with other medications.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mark
Wed May 2, 2012 10:42 PM
IIf you really want to explore a pharmaceutical issue, take a close look at statin medications, used to treat cholesterol levels. The side effects are grossly understated, and a close look at several statistical studies shows that there is a slight descrease in heart disease in a small part of the population, and an increase in all-cause mortality overall. Incredible amounts of money for the drug manufacturers, and unexplained memory deficits and muscle destruction in a lot of people.
Comment: #3
Posted by: partsmom
Thu May 17, 2012 1:59 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Alexander Cockburn
Jul. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 21 Apr 2014
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 19 Apr 2014
Ted Rall
Ted RallUpdated 18 Apr 2014

31 Aug 2007 Republicans Rocked By Yet Another Gay Scandal

12 Jan 2007 Bush Hawks War "Surge" to Hostile Congress and Nation

25 Mar 2011 Oh, What a Stupid War!