creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion General Opinion
Linda Chavez
Linda Chavez
18 Apr 2014
The Problem with Dartmouth

Dartmouth College has a problem. Protestors occupied the president's office at the Ivy League school a couple … Read More.

11 Apr 2014
Bush Candor Could Win the Day

Agree with him or not, you have to respect Jeb Bush's honesty. On two issues, immigration and a common core … Read More.

4 Apr 2014
What's Race Got To Do with It?

I like Megyn Kelly. The Fox News anchor is smart, lively and gorgeous. But she's managed to walk right into a … Read More.

Loose Lips Endanger Lives

Comment

The U.S. dodged another terrorist bullet when a would-be "underwear bomber" turned out to be a double agent. The news became public this week after rumors had circulated in April that Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), a Yemini-based group that is now the chief terrorist threat against the U.S., had been planning a spectacular attack to coincide with the one-year anniversary of the American raid that killed Osama bin Laden last May 2.

At first, the White House and other administration sources played down the rumors, saying that there was no credible information that an attack was being planned. Then some briefers modified their answers to suggest that America had not been in imminent danger. By Monday, word had leaked out that an attack was in the works but had been thwarted because the bomber was a double agent.

It's great that AQAP failed in its attempt to strike the United States or down one of our domestic airlines. What is not so great is that people inside the administration felt it necessary to share what they knew about the operation with the press. When it comes to covert activity, the less the public knows, the better.

It's hard to know if these leaks were politically motivated — though the timing seems ripe for the president to gain some advantage for being tough on terrorism during an election year. But it may be simply that some people just can't keep their mouths shut. Unfortunately, in this case, they have clearly put lives at risk and may make it far more difficult to infiltrate AQAP and other groups in the future. Ultimately, this will mean that these groups may someday succeed in killing Americans, as the 9/11 hijackers did.

The press accounts detailing the operation have been stunningly exhaustive. The bomber is reported to have been a Saudi with travel documents that would have allowed him to board a U.S.-bound plane. He is described as having infiltrated AQAP in a low level position, perhaps after being detained in Saudi Arabia on suspicion of terrorist ties and then turned to serve as a Saudi agent.

We also know from press reports that the operation was primarily a Saudi one, run by Saudi security agents in cooperation with the CIA.

We know the double agent already had the bomb in his possession and details of the bomb parts have been reported in news accounts.

The components apparently consisted of using a special kind of underwear and non-metallic explosives that the plotters thought would pass undetected though airport detection devices. And, the sources revealed that the bomb had a backup detonator in case the first failed as it did in the foiled Christmas Day bomb attempt over Detroit in 2009.

All of this detail — especially the role played by Saudi Arabia — gives invaluable information on "sources and methods" that are the basis of all good intelligence work. Newspaper reports have also pinpointed when the double agent was taken out of the country by noting that drone attacks took out a Yemini terrorist right afterwards.

Some stories have hinted that the plot had to be interrupted earlier than planned because of news leaks that jeopardized the double agent's life. But they have also suggested that several other agents remain inside AQAP. Does anyone care that these valuable assets have been jeopardized by the amount of information leaked to the media?

The administration has launched an investigation into how the leaks occurred. But such investigations rarely uncover the culprits. Look what happened in the Bush years when an exhaustive investigation and prosecutions accused White House official "Scooter" Libby of leaking the name of CIA covert operative Valerie Plame to journalists. Though convicted, Libby turned out not to be the source of the leak. Instead, Richard Armitage, who had served in several administrations and was a favorite of the media, was the person who leaked Plame's name and blew her cover.

In the Plame case, she and her husband, former diplomat Joe Wilson, ended up making money and gaining notoriety, becoming minor celebrities. The current leaks will make no one rich or famous, however. Instead, lives will likely be sacrificed.

There was an old saying in World War II: Loose lips sink ships. The warning could never be more apt than in this case.

Linda Chavez is the author of "An Unlikely Conservative: The Transformation of an Ex-Liberal." To find out more about Linda Chavez, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
I hate to criticize, but there are things in this column I didn't know about. Are you sure you're that obscure that it won't hurt?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Jorge
Sat May 12, 2012 7:23 AM
Ma'am;... Loose lips sink ship was really sort of a sexually loaded metaphor in its day... Kind of like: It's not the size of the ship, but the size of the bank account... You know, a lot of sources are already burned before they are talked about... The best thing is to let them know they have been had so they begin to doubt everyone they don't know enough about... It is really an old technique... It is based upon the old wisdom of the ages, that no one should doubt the limitless power of money to corrupt, even the devout Muslim... Hell; give me a few bucks and a beer and I'll spill my guts... No torture required... But take it from me: If you have to ask government for the truth, you'll never know...Most people denied the truth are pretty good at guessing it...And that would mean me too... It might be different if anyone would pay me a dime to tell a lie...Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 12, 2012 11:31 AM
Chavez. Op Ed: nice article.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Ted Savard
Mon May 14, 2012 3:00 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Linda Chavez
Apr. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 19 Apr 2014
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 18 Apr 2014
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 18 Apr 2014

26 Mar 2010 Bum's Rush for Bibi

20 Jan 2012 The Higher-Education Bubble

5 Feb 2010 Abstinence Education Works After All