creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
William Murchison
William Murchison
22 May 2012
Do You Care? I Don't

All the Facebook tabulation of recent days — whatever it may have meant to Mark Zuckerberg and his … Read More.

15 May 2012
Same-Sex Politics

So how did "same-sex marriage" get to be a political issue in the first place — the kind of … Read More.

8 May 2012
The Truth When It Hurts

What Barack Obama has going for him in 2012 is, well, put it this way: human nature. Witness the French. … Read More.

The Palin Perplexity

Share Comment

Sarah Palin is the best thing that's happened lately to the right and the left, both at the same time. Much of the right pays her obeisance for mobilizing the troops and smart-alecking the left — which in turn loves her for splitting (so the left hopes) the right over her personality and track record.

The best way for a conservative to incur a black eye and a "country club Republican" label is to suggest that the mother of Bristol Palin and host of "Sarah Palin's Alaska" hasn't it in her to lead the world's — still, we hope — leading nation.

Not requiring a black eye at the moment, I decline to enter the contest. There's a basic question to consider, all the same: Must we take it for granted that a best-selling author and all-purpose celeb has presidential aspirations we are obliged to sort through?

Might it not prove the case that she's merely enjoying celebrity and the accompanying paychecks and royalties? The ex-governor's nimble instincts don't — yet — prove anything about her save that she's quicker on her feet than Bristol; with a matchless eye for what was once called the main chance; not to mention, as Americans used to say, the nerve of an Army mule.

If we grant her celebrity status, that takes care of a lot of problems. We don't have to psychoanalyze her constantly, as if she were Barack Obama. Conservatives can settle back and let her give speeches (which she does with enormous enthusiasm, if less-than-great pitch and intonation) for any candidate she wants to endorse. There's really no Palin problem in this event. She's a free lance, like the roving European knights whose military careers gave rise to the name. A free lance is fine.

What if she does, though, after all, want to be president? The Sarah conundrum rises at this point to a higher, more feverish pitch. I might circle around the matter cautiously and suggest that the pathway to the White House is less promising than it once was for inspirational speakers with great life stories.

A principle reason for this is Barack H. Obama.

Once bitten, twice shy, is the folk adage. A couple of years ago, the public — especially that portion susceptible to the political love bug — fell hard for a barely known Illinois senator, one Mr. Obama. He was too cool for words — an opinion that everyone now is sure he shares. Two years later ... well, why go into what everyone knows?

The parallels between Obama and Palin are marked: thin resumes, large talents for getting attention. Some of the backlash against Palin's overnight fame actually resembles the sniping and disdain that has followed Obama since the election. Whereas once he could do no wrong, he now seems incapable — as the left sees it — of doing any right.

Palin comes on, politically, like the upperclassman a sorority pledge met late one night at the "Twilight" costume party: best abs ever and, oh, those discreet tattoos! — but will he still respect me in the morning?

There is no reason to suspect Palin of attempting a con job, saying what she says, in the way she says it, for mere personal aggrandizement. On the other hand, before we hand over the country to her, we need to take the lady's measure in terms of character, intelligence and skills. We need to know her philosophy, her ideals — not just in glittering outline but instead in specifics. How would she save Medicare? How would she deal with Putin, Karzai, Chavez and Ahmadinejad? How would she like America to integrate newcomers into its national life? How would she have us protect unborn life?

Voters need not to guess at these things; they need clear understandings from candidate A or B, or P, as to what proposals they would advance.

President Palin? We can't rule that out in the long run. But please not in 2012. There isn't time for that — not a fourth of it, not a tenth. She needs to grow on us as our problems, our challenges, our opportunities grow on her.

William Murchison writes from Dallas. To learn more about William Murchison, and to see features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
William Murchison
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

13 Jan 2009 Those Poor, Poor Terrorists

29 May 2007 Happy Birthday, Big John

20 May 2008 The California Supreme Court Versus Reality