creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
William Murchison
William Murchison
14 Feb 2012
Power Vs. Liberty

"Compromise," in President Obama's lexicon, has a funny meaning. It means — with respect to … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Planned Parenthood's Grand Delusion

Go the website PlannedParenthood.org. You know, Planned Parenthood, around whose rippling banner enlightened … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
How to Split and Spoil a Party

What's all this "Republican establishment" vs. "grassroots populist" business; would … Read More.

Ready To Lead?

Share Comment

He might still win. And then, again, he might not. What matters most, in some sense, is that Capt. John McCain has chosen not to strike his colors. There is enormous potential significance in McCain's attempt to rise from the inanity and waste of the weeks since the GOP presidential convention.

How do we know for sure he's making the attempt? We can't for sure. We can't know anything in this crazy, extraordinary year of 2008. What we can deduce is that he knows what he's about to get is plow-cleaned the way things are going. He knows, from deep experience, that it's time to do something, namely, lead.

It's what officers do. It's what McCain is in this thing for in the first place — to lead. It's his last hope — to be seen leading at a time of stress.

At Virginia Beach on Monday, McCain acknowledged what Republicans and conservatives have been saying for days. "We have 22 days to go," he said. "We're six points down. The national media has written us off."

Well, why not? Hardly had the McCain-Palin campaign launched at the GOP presidential race than it sprang leaks. Soon it was low in the water. As the stock market sagged, then plummeted, the most McCain could find to say was that the chairman of the Securities & Exchange Commission should be fired, and that we should all hate greed. The dramatic moment he had intended, or his advisers had intended for him — the suspension of campaigning in order to help solve the financial crisis — was a bust.

The attacks on Obama, likewise, flopped. Bill Ayers was a very bad actor in 1970, but who cares about him in 2008? What are (BEGIN ITALS) you (END ITALS) going to do for us, John? Where do (BEGIN ITALS) you (END ITALS) want to go?

The Virginia Beach speech wasn't a bundle of answers. Its strength was tone, attitude. McCain would lead. He was an officer, running — he finally seemed to understand — for the role of commanding officer.

Commanders get out in front. They say to discouraged troops: Come on, get up, we're moving. They say: I know what to do, I'll lead the way. Get up, let's go.

"We're in a moment of national crisis that will determine our future," said McCain, acknowledging what everybody else in the country knew. Will we continue to lead the world's economies, or will we be overtaken? Will the world become safer or more dangerous? ... My answer to you is: Yes, we will lead; yes, we will prosper; yes, we will be safer; yes, we will pass on to our children a better, stronger country."

It may not work in the end. Or it may. The signal factor here is McCain's evident realization that his strength, in the name of the political party with which he identifies, isn't the careful parsing of phrases and programs. His strength is the look that says, here's what's wrong, come on, let's get to work.

So up he stands, with just weeks to go before the election, and says, here's what we do. If not nearly enough at this point, believe and buy in — he has still the chance to leave an important legacy. A McCain wipe out — occasioned by obsession with marginalities rather than penetrating attention to the nation's economic and security problems — would entrust government for years to a party with no instinct for economic freedom and no eye for discerning easily the difference between friend and foe on the international scene.

McCain needs, for various reasons, to give Obama a race for his money. First, because what presidential candidate could relish going down in history as just another Bob Dole, hawking Viagra on television? Second, because scaring even a victorious Obama could slow him down, and also his supporters, as they moved to raise taxes and redefine America's role in the world.

What's the program for McCain? The Virginia Beach speech, one can only hope, tips it. The program is to do what John McCain has so often said he wants to do: Lead.

William Murchison is a senior fellow of the Texas Public Policy Foundation. To find out more about William Murchison and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
If McCain is all you think he is and all he say's he is, why do so many of you have to tell him what to do and how to do it?
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:40 AM
I'd vote for the right person for the job in a heartbeat, but McCain/Palin aren't qualified. The Republican party, your own people say McCain is losing because he's not doing the job. Everyone I read now is telling McCain what to do and how to do it to win this campaign. If he's the brilliant leader you say he is, why is everyone telling him what to do and how to do it? Is that "leading"? Question: if he wins the office, who will be telling him what he should and shouldn't do then? Who really will be running the country? Ask yourself, if he can't do the job to win an election against a black man with an unusual name and not much experience, how skilled is he? What if that black man with an unusual name and not much experience were the leader of another country, how would he handle that opponent? He may be skilled with weapons of war and fighting but if this country and this world is to move forward, we need men of peace with cool heads and sharp minds. If McCain should take office, what if he should come up against a leader of another country as formidable an opponent as the democratic senator Obama. If they have differences, how will he win? Who will be advising him, the military? McCain underestimated Senator Obama, so now he's pulled out all the dirty weapons in his arsenal. Has Senator Obama changed? Did he become public enemy # 1? No. He's still the same guy he was, warts and all.
McCain changed. He is running scared and playing dirty. He tries now to instill fear of Obama and incite the crowds to try to legitimize his failed and dirty campaign and get us to accept his dirty deeds. Obama, who is the object of derision, has done nothing except to run for President. Is this not a continuation of Bucheney? Can't win fair so win foul. Can't resolve it with words, bomb 'em or ridicule them, then get the American people to fear and hate them so they don't look at or see how inadequate and ineffective are the people charged with leading our great country.
Comment: #2
Posted by: liz
Tue Oct 14, 2008 11:34 AM
Sir;... Let me tell you the problem witth both candidates. It is that they think they must lead.... In a democracy the people lead. Do you see the government following the will of  the people???Anyone can get elected to something, but no one can be voted better brains than they are born with, and even the best brain cannot beat the genius of the people. If you want to lead the people see which way they are going and get in front. Never say whoa in a horse race. Don't try to stop a stampede. Look at someone like Lincoln who never once tried to get far ahead of public opinion. One can only do what the people allow, or need done. Before any of these so called leaders tell the people they have to take less so some rich guy can take more, they better hide. I would say a good sort of leader tells the people to express their will, and not just by voting for a candidate, but by creating a government they can support, and consent to. The government has lost the faith of  the people, and their trust. That is an essential fact in every single form of relationship. Each needs trust, and our trust has been abused. We have been told that many rich would make us secure, happy and healthy. As the number of rich have grown so has grown our desparation. Let the people speak. Let the people reform their  government as the government cannot reform itself.... No, I don't think changing a handful of faces is going to give the people the change they need. A good leader would guide and teach the people what was possible if they were willing. To count on the people being powerless and divided is a risky bet. Everyone realizes by now that the government has failed us. That is a fact they need to communicate to the government before change will occur. We have to lead, and government has to follow...Thanks...Sweeney 
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Oct 14, 2008 6:18 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
William Murchison
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

28 Dec 2010 Elections Have Consequences

18 Aug 2009 Love And The Ruins

20 Jan 2009 The Comparative Insignificance Of Politics