creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
William Murchison
William Murchison
14 Feb 2012
Power Vs. Liberty

"Compromise," in President Obama's lexicon, has a funny meaning. It means — with respect to … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Planned Parenthood's Grand Delusion

Go the website PlannedParenthood.org. You know, Planned Parenthood, around whose rippling banner enlightened … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
How to Split and Spoil a Party

What's all this "Republican establishment" vs. "grassroots populist" business; would … Read More.

Main Street U.S.A.

Share Comment

One major problem with politics — as we've all probably figured out by now — is that politicians view every human challenge as political in nature, meaning, particularly these last few years. Objective No. 1 in the political trade is sticking to it The Other Party.

What else could explain Democratic obstinacy and obfuscation over offshore oil drilling? The national interest certainly couldn't explain it.

A basic principle of oil exploration is that you look for oil where it is, instead of where you'd like it to be. Assuming, in the Democrats' case, there's any place they would like it to be.

When, over the weekend, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced she was ready to let the House consider expanded offshore drilling, she had to do so in the context of whamming the Bush administration, which, she alleged, "has increased our dependence on foreign oil, damaged our economy and left consumers paying record prices at the pump."

We all may be assured of one thing: The speaker herself isn't interested in finding oil. Her recent claim — "I'm trying to save the planet" (by keeping drillers away from offshore waters) — has less to do with securing stable energy supplies than with helping guide the Democrats to absolute control over Washington, D.C. The nation's need for energy can wait a bit. First, we have to kick a few more Republicans in the pants.

The speaker's offer to "consider opening portions of the Outer Continental Shelf for drilling" comes to us accompanied by language about "appropriate safeguards" — whatever "appropriate" means to a congressional committee — and repudiation of "taxpayer subsidies to big oil." (That entire countries — e.g., Russia, Iran, Venezuela and Saudi Arabia — constitute "big oil" in a special and dangerous sense is a thought one guesses the speaker wouldn't utter under torture.)

The speaker's turnaround on "considering" offshore drilling likely has more to do with voter anger over high gasoline prices than with sudden recognition that, oops, it's time to increase domestic oil supplies.

Demagoguery — note the Greek origins of the word — has been with us always: an indestructible part of our Edenic inheritance.

A self-styled leader of "the people" wants power. He — or she — pumps the voters up, promising to bring down the bad guys and raise up the good ones. Him — or her — for instance.

Well, all right, we'll never have done with demagogues and demagoguery short of the Second Coming. What we can do meantime is sniff it out, point to it, warn of its consequences. The consequences of demagoguing the enterprise of drilling oil wells is potentially vast. Nobody, until recently, saw anything wrong with drilling wells, especially if the wells were in godforsaken places like, ahem, my native Texas. Or in Texas' offshore waters. You wanted oil? You drilled. It was as simple as that. You drilled, you found the oil, brought it to the surface, refined it, sold it.

During the "energy crisis" of the '70s, when reduced imports of oil caused prices to soar, anti-oil company demagoguery flowered. The formerly serious and sensible cold war hawk, Sen. Henry (Scoop) Jackson of Washington, memorably waggled his finger at an array of oil company presidents on whom he threatened to "slap subpoenas" if they didn't cooperate with the public interest represented — oh, so clearly! — by the senator from Washington. Successor demagogues have this year staged the same sideshow in variant forms. As if oil companies existed to bleed the customers rather than satisfy their needs!

Forget logic. Forget realism. Demagoguery of the Pelosi-Democratic party sort is about acquiring political advantage through smearing an industry that potential Democratic voters can be persuaded to dislike and punish.

Denounce, denounce, denounce. Attack, smear and calumniate. Sure finds a lot of oil, doesn't it? As for drill, drill, drill, the Democratic Party seems to have handed off that particular mission to your dentist.

William Murchison is a senior fellow of the Texas Public Policy Foundation. To find out more about William Murchison and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
William Murchison
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

16 Sep 2008 Hands Off The Marketplace

22 Apr 2008 Politics and Religion

5 Oct 2010 Voting With Their Feet