creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
William Murchison
William Murchison
14 May 2013
The IRS and Lord Acton

"Trust us" is the mantra of Big Government. Trust us, why? Because — the words hardly need … Read More.

7 May 2013
The Age of the Talkers: Politics in 2013

On the one hand, here's hyper-talkative Barack Obama losing presidential traction every day, it seems, on … Read More.

30 Apr 2013
When 'Bush League' Is a Compliment

Naturally enough, the blowout at the Bush Presidential Center in Dallas last week was all about the Bush who … Read More.

Magnificent Maggie

Comment

The point to keep in mind about people such as Maggie Thatcher is that their like don't really die. To live large is to live on: a point easy to grasp in an age when the doing of great deeds, the taking up of mighty tasks, passes as a personal eccentricity.

Consider the prime minister's reaction to caution flags hoisted by her own foreign office as the Royal Navy, in 1982, prepared to take back the Falkland Islands from the Argentines. Mrs. Thatcher allowed in her memoirs that certain of the cautions had force; e.g., "the risk of the Soviets becoming involved, the disadvantage of being looked at as a colonial power."

Yes? Really? "(W)hen you are at war you cannot allow the difficulties to dominate your thinking: you have to set out with an iron will to overcome them. And anyway what was the alternative? That a common or garden dictator should rule over the Queen's Subjects and prevail by fraud and violence? Not while I was Prime Minister."

A queen of the English people had spoken in like vein, 400 years earlier: " ... and (I) think foul scorn that Parma or Spain or any prince of Europe should dare to invade the borders of my realm."

Courage and firmness, against the Armada or the Argentines, have their effects — generally positive ones. At worst they remind all within earshot that the right thing to do, at grave moments, is to do the right thing.

Margaret Thatcher built a legend, not just a career, on doing what her highly reliable conscience told her was right and necessary. For the world, and even her own country, taking the measure of this remarkable woman required study and time. She wore moral armor in preference to the shifting fashions of political advantage and survival. A "conviction politician," to use the phrase she applied to herself, she rode full tilt at political dragons: of whom there were vast numbers in late 20th century Britain.

The socialists had made a mess of a great nation.

Around the world, Great Britain was known as "the sick man of Europe" (a reproach previously directed at Ottoman Turkey). "(T)he British Government (she wrote) ... jammed a finger in every pie." "It levied high rates of tax on work, enterprise, consumption, and wealth transfer." The Labor Party "gloried in planning, regulation, controls, and subsidies."

Compromise with a system she despised wasn't likely to work. "To cure the British disease with socialism was like trying to cure leukemia with leeches. ... We had to stress continually that, however difficult the road might be and however long it took to reach our destination, we intended to achieve a fundamental change of direction. We stood for a new beginning, not more of the same." A new beginning they got, thanks to Mrs. Thatcher and the politics of conviction.

I could go on and on in praise of a great and heroic lady. I think there may be some point in bearing down on the dispirited state of politics here in Mrs. Thatcher's valued ally, the United States. What to do; what to do? What deals to cut, what rough edges to smooth down, enabling American conservatives to contest the successes of the left wing in American life: so similar to those the pre-Thatcher British faced 40 years ago?

Margaret Thatcher saw her country's vain, strutting left as less in need of conciliation and compromise than of overthrow through the expedient of democratic electoral politics. She won! She brought off the enterprise of changing facts on the ground by reinvigorating faith in freedom.

Whom did she herself admire? Ronald Reagan: "buoyant, self-confident, good-natured;" a man who "instinctively felt and thought as I did; not just about policies but about a philosophy of government, a view of human nature, all the high ideals and values which lie — or ought to lie — beneath any politician's ambition to lead his country." And might again. No one can foresee what's likely to happen, even in politics, when crisis meets up with courage, vision and willpower.

William Murchison, author and commentator, write from Dallas. To find out more about William Murchison, and to see features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.Creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... Isn't it the truth that the damage we do to humanity lives on long after we are dead??? Look a Dear Maggie... Her deal with the devil must have fallen through... She must have said: I am bored with sin, and if I go to hell I can grow every day a thousand skins to have each flayed off once again...
No; such people are born tired of living, and they do not understand anything of the joy of life people feel just for the fun of it... It all has to be with a purpose to some, work hard, achieve, gain, profit, invest, and spend spend spend...
Do you not wonder at such people living such remarkable long lives??? It is because they do not to exert themselves in the course of their lives that is not by way of exercise... They are not worked to death, or worried to death, or bored to death like so many... No; they are of that class who sow suffering, and reap dividends...For them I have this prayer: Though- their corporations are infernal, and live on and on, immortal, death is to life a portal, and thank God they do pass through...
Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:24 PM
Sir;... No doubt she had the iron will of a woman in the poor frail body of a prime minister... She was so like the Queen dear soul... She must have had a touch of nobility in her... She would have done as Elizebeth had done so many years before, and keep her fleet at sea because she had no money to pay them until fully half had starved to death... Such will is enviable, and such loyalty, laudible... It is too bad such people cannot keep whole populations at bay like a navy with the threat of the yard arm and a short rope... Oh were those not the days... And what was if for??? Was it for the illusion of empire... God save the queen... Don't let any of those royal bastard get away long enough to plead common blood with humanity...Net them all and let not one of those fishes go...
Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:33 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
William Murchison
May. `13
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 May 2013
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 14 May 2013
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 14 May 2013

21 Jun 2010 Good For You, Joe Barton

12 Jan 2010 Time for Term Limits

20 Feb 2007 Our Humpty-Dumpty Political Class