Monday, September 08, 2008 | 4:25 a.m.

William Murchison - Main Street, U.S.A.

Home > Opinion Columns > William Murchison
Please contact your local newspaper editor if you want to read William Murchison's column in your hometown paper.
William Murchison

Recently

  • The Moose Is Loose
    It's a nutty year, a crazy time in our national life, and I've decided to decide — you'll be glad to hear this, John McCain — that the ostensibly nutty choice of Sarah Palin as running mate is nutty in all the right ways. That's to say, …
  • The Senator Who Won't Go Away
    I might not have thought of this but for the anointing last weekend of Joe Biden as successor-designate to Dick Cheney — status to be confirmed, or disallowed, at the polls in November. Joe Biden? What's Joe Biden doing still hanging around? …
  • Main Street U.S.A.
    One major problem with politics — as we've all probably figured out by now — is that politicians view every human challenge as political in nature, meaning, particularly these last few years. Objective No. 1 in the political trade is …
  • The Georgia Crisis: Does Obama 'Get' It?
    When it's "change" you're merchandising, the easy phrases flow easily enough. Walls between people "cannot stand." With "improbable hope," we prepare to "to remake the world once again" — "a world …

Did Texas Go Too Far?

Podcast available through:

If you like William Murchison, you might enjoy

As Archie Bunker, in "All in the Family," used to affirm, "Nixon knows something I don't know." It was both a comical and a semilogical way of standing behind the President's much-berated Vietnam policies.

What about, in our own day, the state of Texas' seizure of 460-some-odd children in a polygamist bust, and their redistribution all over the state? Would the state's reasoning — that the children, all of them, were in danger of abuse in their polygamous setting — qualify for the same exemption from scrutiny that Archie accorded Nixon's war decisions?

Not according to the Texas appeals court that on May 22 pronounced the state's "protective" actions illegal, saying evidence of any threat the children faced was "legally and factually insufficient." In other words, the court thinks the state launched a preemptive strike for which it lacked authority. Children and mothers were rounded up for only the most generalized of purposes, and roughly dispersed without, perhaps, due cause.

The polygamist story has been all over the place, not excluding the front page of The New York Times and the networks. Numerous Archie Bunkers, I would guess, willing to give the state the benefit of the doubt in many things, are fast rethinking the matter. Maybe after all, in this case, the state went too far, good intentions notwithstanding.

Reflexive trust in the benevolence of the state's intentions (specifically those of the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services) likely stems in part from the multifarious horror stories that have filled heads and minds in recent decades — accounts of child abuse by adults, of the reduction of the innocent to objects of prey by the powerful. Priests, day-care center operators, youth workers and, yes, parents — whom can you trust any more?

We seem to have overdosed on these stories — some true but many constructed on flimsy evidence — to the point that child-adult relationships now invite almost automatic suspicion.
We appear to sometimes no longer trust adults in general to do right by children in general. The flip side of too much trust — alas — is too little, which could be where we are now.

Texas may have generalized too much, come down too soon, too hard, too fast without sorting out the facts. Or, maybe not. The point to notice is the overall discomfort the Texas experience causes. All these kids, these mothers — does the hammer of government have to smash their lives without better evidence of pending danger and harm? We need to learn much, much more about "what Nixon knows."

The discussion returns us meanwhile, or should, to a familiar point: that family relationships and responsibilities — hard as 21st century society works at redefining them — are of the cultural essence. Worthy of state protection, yes, but worthier still of that tender cultivation and support only the family can give — father to mother, mother to father, children to parents, parents to children. It's why the culture has to be so careful in dealing with those relationships: to acknowledge the danger of child abuse and at the same time to avoid freaking out over mere suspicion of adult misbehavior.

One reason for the "Nixon-knows" defense of Texas' intervention at the polygamist ranch is that Texas' famously conservative government isn't famous for overreaching. A second reason: the weirdness of polygamy, outlawed in this country for more than a century. Yet even good intentions sometimes go astray. And it's possible to believe that a polygamist isn't, you know, all there, without imagining him or her to be an abuser of children.

To take children from parents is hard and bad enough when there's unmistakable cause. When the cause is merely inferred, sniffed at, imperfectly traced to the source — then the state goes too far.

Did the state go "too far" in this present notorious instance? What did "Nixon" know, and when did he know it? The Texas court of appeals invites us to urgent consideration of urgent questions — these two just for starters.

William Murchison is a senior fellow of the Texas Public Policy Foundation. To find out more about William Murchison and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.




AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Get RSS Feed for William Murchison Email updates Email me William Murchison updates Comments Comments
Originally Published on Tuesday May 27, 2008


William Murchison's column is released once a week.
Editors Picks - Opinion Columns
Report From a Forgotten War (5th and Last in a Series)
Oliver North
Media to Republicans: We're Sorry
Roger Simon
My Brain Tumor
Robert D. Novak
See All
More William Murchison
Sep. `08
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
View By Month
About the author Print friendly format Write the author Email This Article to a friend
All newspaper editors want to know what their readers like. If you would like to read this feature in your local newspaper, please do not hesitate to share your enthusiasm with your local newspaper editor.


 

Shop Creators Syndicate

 
Monday, September 08, 2008 | 4:25 a.m.
About Creators | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Editor's login | FAQ | En Español
Copyright © 2006 Creators.com. All Rights Reserved.
Web Development by JJCO