creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
15 Feb 2012
Rising Black Social Pathology

The Philadelphia Inquirer's big story Feb. 4 was about how a budget crunch at the Philadelphia School … Read More.

8 Feb 2012
Economic Chaos Ahead

Let's think about the kind of mess that we're in. Federal 2010 Medicare and Medicaid expenditures totaled $… Read More.

1 Feb 2012
Obama's Racial Politics

There's been a heap of criticism placed upon President Barack Obama's domestic policies that have promoted … Read More.

Will Republicans Save Us?

Share Comment

Democrat control of the White House, House of Representatives and the Senate has produced an unprecedented level of political brazenness and contempt for the limitations placed on the federal government by the U.S. Constitution. As such, it has raised a level of constitutional interest and anger against Washington's interference in our lives that has been dormant for far too long.

Part of this heightened interest and anger is seen in the strength of the tea party movement around the nation. Another is the angry reception that many congressmen receive when they return to their districts and at town hall meetings. According to the most recent Gallup poll, only 20 percent of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, but that's up from a March 2010 low of 16 percent.

The smart money suggests that there will be a Republican takeover of the House of Representatives and possibly the Senate. The question is what can liberty-minded Americans expect from a Republican majority? Maybe a good starting point for an answer might be to examine how Republicans have handled their majority in the past.

Democrat President Lyndon Johnson's term of office saw massive increases in federal spending. When Johnson was elected into office in 1964, federal spending was $118 billion. When he left office in 1968, federal spending was $178 billion, a 66 percent increase. Worse than the massive increase in federal spending, his administration and Democratically controlled Congress saddled us with two programs that have helped fuel today's fiscal disaster — Medicare and Medicaid.

The 1994 elections gave Republican control of both the House and Senate. They held a majority for a decade. The 2000 election of George W. Bush as president gave Republicans what the Democrats have now, total control of the legislative and executive branches of government. When Bush came to office, federal spending was $1.788 trillion. When he left office, federal spending was $2.982 trillion.

That's a 60 percent increase in federal spending, closely matching the profligacy of Lyndon Johnson's presidency.

During the Republican control, the nation was saddled with massive federal interference in education through No Child Left Behind. Prescription drug handouts became a part of the Republican-controlled Congress' legacy. And it was during this interval that Congress accelerated its interference, assisted by the Federal Reserve Bank, in the housing market in the name of homeownership that produced much of the financial meltdown that the nation suffered in 2008.

During the last two years, Democrats have amassed unprecedented growth of federal government power in the forms of bailouts, corporate takeovers, favors to their political allies and nationalization of our health care system. My question is how likely is it for Republicans to behave differently if they gain control? Their past behavior doesn't make one confident that they will behave much differently, but I could be wrong.

If Republicans win the House of Representatives, there are measures they should take in their first month of office, and that is to undo most of what the Democratically controlled Congress has done. If they don't win a veto-proof Senate, they can't undo Obamacare but the House alone can refuse to fund any part of it. There are numerous blocking tactics that a Republican-controlled House can take against those hell-bent on trampling on our Constitution. The question is whether they will have guts and principle to do it. After all, many Americans, including those who are Republicans, have a stake in big government control, special privileges and handouts.

Ultimately, we Americans must act to ensure that our liberty does not depend on personalities in Washington. Our founders tried to do that with our Constitution. Thomas Jefferson offered us a solution when he said, "The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then."

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
You neglect to mention the enormous cost of war in both Johnson's and Bush's terms, Vietnam for Johnson, and Iraq for Bush.

You also neglect to mention that our debt-backed dollar requires an ever-increasing federal debt to stay afloat. The Fed expands the money supply to lend to every Congressional boondoggle, no matter what party.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Katharine C. Otto, MD
Tue Aug 17, 2010 3:56 PM
Dr. Williams, you're columns are usually outstanding. Today it seems as if you phoned it in, though. It is factually incorrect that the election of George Bush in 2000 gave the Republicans the same thing the Democrats have today. It was 50-50 in the Senate and in June of 2001, thanks to Jumpin' Jim Jeffords, the Republicans lost the Senate completely. The gained it back after the 2002 elections, but lost both houses in 2006. Bush had four years with his party in control of both houses and never had anything like the majorities Obama enjoys today.
I think that when the president's party controls congress, the president sets the legislative (and spending) tone, but when it does not, the Speaker sets the tone. So, Clinton gets credit for 1993-1994, Gingrich (et al) for 1995-2000, Bush 2001-2006 (only marginally for 2001-2002), Pelosi 2007-2008, Obama 2009-2010. What did the economy do in each of those periods? What happened to spending in each of those periods? Answer those questions and you ought to be able to figure who to vote for in November.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Nate Kelley
Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:30 AM
Will Republicans save us? No! They too, spent like Maharishi's when they had the power. America hasn't been fiscally responsible since the "New Deal" era of FDR. Since then, it been a conduit of cash for one failed program after another: formation of the Dept of Education, no child left behind and bailout stimuli- to name a few. So, out of control spending is embedded into the American psyche and will hard pressed to remove. Let's go back to the gold standard.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Patrick
Thu Aug 19, 2010 12:58 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Walter E. Williams
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

28 Sep 2011 The Financial Mess in the US and Europe

1 Sep 2010 Something for Nothing

24 Nov 2010 Health Tyrants