creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
23 May 2012
Should Black People Tolerate This?

Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of the time, the murderer is another black person.… Read More.

16 May 2012
Should We Obey All Laws?

Let's think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a … Read More.

9 May 2012
Leftist Race-baiters

MSNBC's Chris Matthews, in a recent debate with former Republican National Chairman Michael Steele, called … Read More.

Liberals Confuse Me

Share Comment

Christine O'Donnell, U.S. Senate candidate from Delaware, has faced considerable criticism and news media attention about her youthful association with witchcraft. Have we seen similar news media attention given to other politicians who have made bizarre remarks that border on gross stupidity — possibly lunacy?

During a congressional Armed Services hearing in March, Rep. Hank Johnson, D-Ga., expressed concern that stationing 8,000 Marines and their equipment on Guam, our Pacific territory, could cause the island "to become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize." Such a remark is grossly stupid but the liberal press didn't give it anywhere near the amount of attention and derision that they gave Christine O'Donnell.

On the campaign trail in March 2008, then-presidential candidate Obama told his Beaverton, Ore., audience, "Over the last 15 months, we've traveled to every corner of the United States. I've now been in 57 states? I think one left to go." Whether Obama misspoke or not, that's a grossly stupid remark, but white liberals among the intellectual elite and the liberal news media all but ignored it. Of course, when former Vice President Dan Quayle misspelled "potatoe," they pounced upon it and had a field day.

So what might explain the liberals giving Hank Johnson and Obama a pass whilst playing up the perceived shortcomings of Christine O'Donnell and Dan Quayle? The answer might be as simple as just looking at the colors involved. O'Donnell and Quayle are white and Johnson and Obama are black. That means the white liberal vision comes into play where to openly oppose, criticize and ridicule blacks is racist. The key term is openly. I bet that when alone, in trusted company, white liberals crack up over the things that some black people say and do. The white liberal vision holds one set of standards to which white people are obliged and another that's lower for blacks.

I don't believe that white liberals are racists in the sense that Klansmen and neo-Nazis are; however, their paternalistic and demeaning attitudes toward blacks are far more debilitating.

There needs to be a bit of elaboration of the statement that to openly oppose, criticize and ridicule a black is racist. If the black in question is a conservative, possibly Republican, then any sort of criticism and treatment is acceptable. This was seen in the criticism and ridicule of Clarence Thomas, Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell. Garry Trudeau's "Doonesbury" cartoon featured President Bush referring to Secretary Rice as "brown sugar." Pat Oliphant showed her as a parrot with big lips and Ted Rall's cartoon had Miss Rice proclaiming herself Bush's "House nigga." Don Wright's cartoon depicted Justice Thomas as Justice Scalia's lawn jockey. These cartoons were carried in major newspapers nationwide. Ask yourself what would happen to a nationally syndicated cartoonist, and the newspaper that carried it, depicting President Obama as a wide-eyed, fat-lipped monkey.

Racial double standards are nothing new. It has been the currency on jobs and college campuses where there is an acceptance of behavior by blacks that would be condemned if done by whites. Often misguided white liberal professors, in the name of making up for injustices of the past, give black students grades they didn't earn. Being 74 years old, I have frequently told people that I'm glad that I received just about all of my education before it became fashionable for white people to like black people. That means I was obliged to live up to higher standards.

More blacks need to be bold and challenge the demeaning attitudes of white liberals. During the early years of the Reagan administration, I had a number of press conferences in response to a book or article that I had written. At several of them, I invited the reporters to treat me like a white person — just ask hard questions.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
I get around this double-standard by only making fun of Obama's white half. Mad props to his mom for THAT loophole.

The important thing is, we can still make fun of white liberals.

Even better, we can make fun of white liberals who make fun of white conservatives:
http://www.dailyscoff.com/?p=2620


-jjg
Gravelle.us
Comment: #1
Posted by: J. Gravelle
Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:15 AM
The liberal double standard is not limited to race. It is the same with sex and religion.
Comment: #2
Posted by: dunce
Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:11 PM
I am almost always astounded by your insight; you generally hit the nail square on the head. This time you are dancing all around the truth, but can't seem to get your finger on it. It's really pretty simple:
Liberals need to be "good" people; they need to feel superior. This need is so strong that liberals regularly subconsciously warp reality into whatever they need it to be to ensure they are the heros of their own stories: Good people aren't racist, ipso facto, they are not racist.
You say you do not believe "white liberals are racists in the sense that Klansmen and neo-Nazis are." You are correct, traditional racism implies hate. You follow up: "Their paternalistic and demeaning attitudes toward blacks are far more debilitating." This is the key to liberal racism. Liberal racism is not hate based racism, it is ego based racism.
People have certain expectations about the behavior of other people. Often we are more hurt by the dashing of our expectations than by a particular inappropriate act itself, especially when we think that it will reflect poorly on ourselves. Those with children or pets understand this easily.
We excuse behaviors in a 6 year old we would never tolerate in an adult; we excuse behaviors in a mentally challenged person we would not excuse in a mentally competent adult; we excuse behaviors in a dog we would not excuse in our children.
There used to be a saying referring to upstanding behavior: "That was very white of you," meaning the behavior was classy, superior behavior. It reflected a way of thinking: Whites are superior, their behavior should reflect this. This belief remains a core belief of white liberals. White liberals tolerate behavior in their pet minorities they would never tolerate among superior people like themselves. The reason is the same in each case: White liberals, down in their heart of hearts, know that their pet minorities are not their equals. Just as they would with any other pet, white liberals know they must love their pet minorities, treated them kindly and judge them in a manner appropriate to their sub-human nature. This is the only way that a good, decent, compassionate (but superior) person can behave.
There have been numerous studies that clearly establish that people universally live up to (or down to) expectations. Achievement will rise when expectations are raised or plummet when expectations are dropped. This is something most people innately understand. Thus liberal Whites can re-enforce their feeling of superiority by insisting on self-fulfilling lower standards for pet minorities.
This, of course, leads to a significant disconnect for liberals. When bright, successful minorities adopt and thrive on traditional conservative (i.e. higher) standards, this puts the lie to core liberal beliefs. The result is a mental break in the liberal mind which presents as blind anger, hostility and rage. Thus the raving racist attacks on folks like Clarence Thomas and Condoleezza Rice.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Tidford Tatt
Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:22 PM
Great
Comment: #4
Posted by: Joe McGee
Wed Sep 29, 2010 11:34 AM
Just goes to show ya. Right or Left you just can't fix stupid...
Comment: #5
Posted by:
Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:43 PM
re:comment #3 Tidford Tatt

Great insight. Brilliant. Thank you!
Comment: #6
Posted by: janet jepsen
Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:28 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Walter E. Williams
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

11 May 2011 Minimum Wage's Discriminatory Effects

2 Apr 2008 The Poverty Hype

22 Aug 2007 Liberal Views, Black Victims