creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Walter Williams
Walter E. Williams
23 May 2012
Should Black People Tolerate This?

Each year, roughly 7,000 blacks are murdered. Ninety-four percent of the time, the murderer is another black person.… Read More.

16 May 2012
Should We Obey All Laws?

Let's think about whether all acts of Congress deserve our respect and obedience. Suppose Congress enacted a … Read More.

9 May 2012
Leftist Race-baiters

MSNBC's Chris Matthews, in a recent debate with former Republican National Chairman Michael Steele, called … Read More.

Economic Fairness

Share Comment

The most prevalent theme in President Barack Obama's Dec. 6 Osawatomie, Kan., speech was the need for greater "fairness." In fact, though the president never defined the term fair(ness), he used it 15 times. Explaining his new hero, Teddy Roosevelt, Obama said: "But Roosevelt also knew that the free market has never been a free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can. He understood the free market only works when there are rules of the road that ensure competition is fair and open and honest." What's fair competition is somewhat subjective, but let me suggest a few examples of what's clearly unfair.

Say a person wants to become a taxi owner. He has a driver's license, a car and accident liability insurance. Is it fair that in New York City, he has to first purchase a taxi license (medallion) that as of October sold for $1 million? Taxi licenses in Chicago go for $56,000. In Boston, they are $285,000, and in Philadelphia, they run $75,000. Is that fair competition?

In some cities, to own a taxi one must obtain a certificate of "public convenience and necessity." At a Public Utility Commission hearing, incumbent taxi owners show up with their attorneys to protest that another taxi company is not needed, and the application is denied. I'd like to have Obama — or anyone else — tell us whether that's fair competition.

The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 is a law with racist origins and broad congressional support. During the 1931 legislative debate over the Davis-Bacon Act, which mandates super-minimum (mostly union) wages on federally financed or assisted construction projects, racist intents were obvious. Rep. John Cochran, D-Mo., supported the bill, saying he had "received numerous complaints ... about Southern contractors employing low-paid colored mechanics getting work and bringing the employees from the South." Rep. Clayton Allgood, D-Ala., complained: "Reference has been made to a contractor from Alabama who went to New York with bootleg labor. ... That contractor has cheap colored labor that he transports, and he puts them in cabins, and it is labor of that sort that is in competition with white labor throughout the country." Rep.

William Upshaw, D-Ga., spoke of the "superabundance or large aggregation of Negro labor." American Federation of Labor President William Green said, "Colored labor is being sought to demoralize wage rates." The Davis-Bacon Act remains law. Modern rhetoric in support of it has changed, but its effects haven't. It continues to discriminate against nonunion construction labor. Most black construction workers are in the nonunion sector. Tragically, both President Obama and almost all black congressmen, doing the bidding of their labor union allies, vote against any measure that would modify or eliminate Davis-Bacon restrictions. Would Obama see the Davis-Bacon Act as fair competition?

Probably the most unfair thing that happens to most blacks is the grossly rotten schools they attend. Often, fraudulent high-school diplomas are conferred that certify they can read, write and compute at the 12th-grade level when in fact they can't perform at the seventh- or eighth-grade level. President Obama's administration strongly opposes educational vouchers, even one as small as the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program, with his Office of Management and Budget saying: "Private school vouchers are not an effective way to improve student achievement. The administration strongly opposes expanding (the program) and opening it to new students." The president is against school choice for low-income parents while his own children attend Sidwell Friends, one of the most prestigious private schools in D.C. Many members of Congress keep their own children out of D.C. public schools; 44 percent of senators and 36 percent of representatives do, and that includes 35 percent of Congressional Black Caucus members, who tend to vote against school choice. Their actions are dictated by what's good for the National Education Association, not low-income black children. Do you think that's fair? By the way, teachers at public schools are twice as likely as other parents to send their own children to private schools. That ought to tell us something.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Nothing is more revealing about Americas' education when Obama can reference the "Roaring 20's" as proof that Capitalism doesn't work and has never worked. "We need a balanced approach to reduce the deficit". That statement speaks volumes about who Obama is. The fact that nothing moves unless you create an imbalance, reminds me of another Marxist named Nikita Kruschev. A man whose people were starving to death in a sea of farmland. Margaret Thatcher and her limited resource island nation, were well fed and enjoying the finer things in life. "How do you feed your people?" Kruschev asks Thatcher. She gave the answer that every American should know, "Prices!". Donated food by the tons would rot in the ports in Russia as millions starved. Just like a marble on a "balanced" table, it went nowhere. Prices on the other hand, direct resources more efficiently than even our great Obama. A man that doesn't even need a budget to allocate resources to his subjects.
Comment: #1
Posted by: L Smith
Mon Dec 12, 2011 10:01 AM
Obama and the Left love to remind us that “the free market has never been a free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can”, as if those advocating free markets believe in the law of the jungle, or that might is right.

If anyone believes in a “free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can”, it is Obama and his fellow socialists, who, through the power of government, use that as their sole modus operandi. They zealously fail to recognise that the fundamental basis of justice is respect for property rights, not a particular set of regulations to “ensure competition is fair and open and honest”. They do this because they know that the stronger property rights are upheld, the weaker is their ability “to take whatever they can from whomever they can”.

The way to counter Obama's rhetoric is to focus debate on property rights; that is their Achilles heel.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Alex Davidson
Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:03 PM
Obama said that “the free market has never been a free license to take whatever you can from whomever you can.” For once, he is right! That is what government does!

Toyota can not force me to buy one of their automobiles, but Government Motors uses the guns of government to force me to pay for Government Motors' automobiles that I didn't order - and do not receive.
Comment: #3
Posted by: dpearson
Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:50 AM
The example of private school vs. public is a good argument against Obamacare. Because Obama is rich, he can send his kids to private school. The poor get government-public school. Where are the tears from the Left about "fairness"? Education is an entitlement, and like the every government run institution, you get below standard results. With Obamacare, the rich will be stuck with rationing. No private school choice, everybody's treated the same (except politicians, no doubt). If the government death panel doesn't okay your treatment, doctors won't be allowed to perform what you need, even if you want to pay the extra out-of-pocket.
Comment: #4
Posted by: james
Wed Dec 14, 2011 10:28 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Walter E. Williams
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

10 Jun 2009 Americans Love Government

7 Dec 2011 Free To Die?

9 Jun 2010 Can Black Americans Afford Obama?