creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Tony Blankley
Tony Blankley
17 Mar 2010
Constitutional Law 101

The president and the Democratic congressional leadership are fighting furiously to pass, with no Republican votes,… Read More.

10 Mar 2010
An American Obsession with Freedom

The publishing of the Declaration of Independence 233 years ago by our Founders was responded to in London by … Read More.

3 Mar 2010
Placing Our Faith in Economic Oracles

One of the sadder categories in the history of human misfortunes is the list of those things that are obvious,… Read More.

St. Obama Learns the Washington Ways

In 1990, former Democratic Speaker of the House Tom Foley advised incoming members of Congress to miss a few floor votes early in their careers. If not, he warned, they might suffer the curse that had befallen 79-year-old, 41-year veteran Rep. Charles E. Bennett of Florida. Although Bennett had won a Silver Star for gallantry in World War II, he then contracted polio and thereafter had to use a cane to get around. Some of his Florida voters thought he might be too frail to serve in Congress. So during his first term, to prove he was not feeble, he left his hospital bed, where he was suffering from pneumonia, so as not to miss a vote.

Soon he was known for this virtue. And he never missed another vote for 40 years. As a result, his career had become a torment — driving through snowstorms, missing important family moments, and generally disrupting his life. As Foley warned, trying to keep a perfect voting record "is a great sentence of life in prison living in uneasy terror" of missing a vote.

I recount this story of old Washington as a cautionary tale for the benefit of young Sen. Obama. There is a joke going around Washington to the effect that Hillary is the senator from New York who was born in Illinois, while Obama is the senator from Illinois who was born in a manger.

It might seem useful to Obama to run as a saint in this wicked, wicked world. But the trouble with posing as a saint is that one sets oneself up to be judged by exalted saintly standards. And just as not missing even a procedural vote haunted Charles Bennett all the days of his congressional life, so playing the part of a saint will make it politically dangerous for Obama to take those necessary little expedient acts that politicians routinely get away with, but for which aspiring saints get disgraced and banished.

In this regard, at least, Bill Clinton will prove to have been wiser than Obama. Clinton never pretended to be virtuous and thus got away with all manner of ethical breaches. From whom little moral behavior is expected, little will be asked.

But for Obama, already — and he has not even secured his nomination yet — three acts of routine political hypocrisy and cynicism threaten to disrupt his self-propelled elevation.

On "Meet the Press" Jan.

22, 2006, Tim Russert and Sen. Obama had the following exchange:

Russert: "When we talked back in November of '04 after your election, I said, 'There's been enormous speculation about your political future. Will you serve your six-year term as United States senator from Illinois?' Obama: 'Absolutely.'"

Obama: "I will serve out my full six-year term. You know, Tim, if you get asked enough, sooner or later you get weary and you start looking for new ways of saying things. But my thinking has not changed."

Russert: "So you will not run for president or vice president in 2008?"

Obama: "I will not."

Oh, dear. Is another routine non-truthing politician "the one we have been waiting for"? It was all very well when Bill Clinton promised to serve out his term as governor and then went back on his word and ran successfully for president. Clinton already was known as a charming liar. But Obama has promised us so much more — no more business as usual. We can do better. Yes, we can.

Non-truthing is getting to be a habit for the waited-for one. As Sen. McCain has pointed out, Obama promised to use public funding in the general election if the Republican candidate would do so also. Well, McCain has agreed to it, but now Obama wants to back out of the deal. After all, when he made the promise, he didn't have a chance of raising more than the public's $85 million stipend. But now that he can raise $300 million, well, what's a little untruth between the waited-for one and his people? Yes, he can.

What else can he do? He can make a big point that his candidacy is not about race — which is a good thing. But then he can brag that his will be a "historic" election. We all assume he is not referring to his having lived in Hawaii. No, obviously he means being the first black president. But "it's not about race." Yes, he can.

Obama's wife confesses that her husband has a pretty big ego. Egos are necessary things for workaday politicians. But they get in the way of sainthood. Because, it would seem, his ego is not only bigger than a breadbox but is already bigger than his sense of integrity. And egos don't get smaller (nor integrity larger) after men get elected president.

Tony Blankley is executive vice president of Edelman public relations in Washington. E-mail him at Tony.Blankley@edelman.com. To find out more about Tony Blankley and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

As a democrat I agree with you about Obama. He is a phony. He has a very cautious voting record in the US and Illinois Senate and never has exercised any bold leadership.. He has gotten where he is by sucking up to corporate America. I suggest you read the Nov.2006 "Harper`s magazine-the article "Barack Obama Inc. The Birth of a Washington Machine", by Ken Silverstein. This came from Paul Krugman`s blog: "One thing I worry about a lot if Obama is the Dem nominee — and he's surely the frontrunner now — is that there will be a backlash against Obamamania. Actually, it's already starting — probably too late to have much effect on the nomination fight, but in plenty of time to affect the general election.I hope I'm just a cynical baby boomer who has never really trusted any politician since 1968. But I just have a very bad feeling about the way things are going. " I agree with him 100%. I will not vote for Obama and neither will many of friends who are mainly Jewish, older and consider themselves Democrats.. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delicious ideas to please the pickiest

Comment: #1
Posted by: Reba Shimansky
Wed Feb 20, 2008 6:07 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
Tony Blankley
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 19 Mar 2010
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 19 Mar 2010
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 19 Mar 2010

13 May 2009 Arabs Pressure Obama for Quick Peace Accord

11 Feb 2009 Our Clever President

4 Jun 2008 Obamaconomics