creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Tony Blankley
Tony Blankley
14 Dec 2011
Newt's Past and Future Leadership

Almost all political commentators agree on one thing. The Republican presidential campaign is unlike any we … Read More.

7 Dec 2011
Secular, Liberal Egypt: We Hardly Knew Ya

One of the nice things about human history is that no matter how much people or their leaders misjudge events … Read More.

30 Nov 2011
How to Break the Partisan Fever

Sunday on "Meet the Press" Colin Powell blamed divisive, poisonous Washington politics on the media … Read More.

McCain's Next Duty Call

Share Comment

The essence of this election season couldn't be simpler. The American public is so appalled at the condition of the country (which it unfairly, but not implausibly blames on the despised President Bush) that with fate casting John McCain in the role of Bush's surrogate, a majority actually is considering voting for Sen. Obama. And when an electorate is intent on doing something, the last thing it wants to hear about are the facts. Moreover, the public's lack of interest in the facts is facilitated by the major American media's refusal to report them.

For example, as Obama has portrayed his political career as one extended beau geste to the ideal of American democracy, a slightly curious media would have thought to report on how he ran his previous elections. And those prior elections, far from being models of honest elections honestly fought, are redolent of Chicago politics at their most suspect.

Obama's first election was described recently by Martin Fletcher, a foreign correspondent for NBC News, in the British newspaper The Times (not on NBC): "Mr Obama won a seat in the state senate in 1996 by the unorthodox means of having surrogates successfully challenge the hundreds of nomination signatures that candidates submit. His Democratic rivals, including Alice Palmer, the incumbent, were all disqualified." Hmm.

Obama's election to the U.S. Senate was even more curious, as described by Gerard Baker in the Irish Independent: "Two exquisitely timed divorces … smoothed the way.

"In the Democratic primary, he was a long shot. But a month before the election, his main opponent, Blair Hull, a wealthy Chicago futures trader, was forced to publish divorce papers that revealed, among other charming details, his wife's claim that he had once threatened to kill her.

"In the general election, lightning struck again. His opponent, the engaging Jack Ryan, had run a campaign as a different sort of Republican. But a few months before the election, his divorce papers revealed that, while he might have been a different sort of Republican, he was from precisely the same stable of Obama political opponents. He had, it turned out, once tried to force his former wife to go with him to sex clubs in Paris."

Was Obama really the innocent beneficiary of these rare events? Anything is possible. But when a fellow deals himself two royal flushes in a row, the other players are entitled to be suspicious.

Moreover, when a politician is suspected of hypocrisy, the Washington press corps usually is supercharged in its efforts to prove their suspicions. But despite the fact that these bare outlines of Obama's elections are pregnant with the implications that he has gained every office he has sought so far by underhanded and sordid means — while posing as a Gary Cooper-like idealist in a corrupt political world — the American media have let these extraordinary events simply pass without significant comment.

During the past few weeks, as I have been traveling extensively across the country, I have yet to find anyone (including a few reporters and producers at local news stations in Florida, California and New York) who has heard of these facts. The response when I recite the facts is always about the same. More or less: "Really? Wow!"

A few days ago, a senior McCain campaign aide was reported to have said that McCain would rather lose with dignity than win by questionable means. I hope that isn't Sen. McCain's view because the aide has it exactly backward. If the polls are reasonably accurate, three weeks of John McCain's campaigning is the only thing standing in the way of the American public making the most uninformed presidential decision since the invention of the telegraph.

John McCain has an unambiguous duty to the nation to force the public to at least be informed as to the nature and character of Sen. Obama. He needs to lay out all the accurate available information of Obama's prior alliances, affiliations and conduct both for the purpose of revealing Obama's character and Obama's radical policy disposition.

The Obama campaign has raised to a high art the technique of politically intimidating people from commenting honestly about Obama. They play the race card dishonestly, and almost the entire deck from which they deal is filled with race cards and threats of litigation. Real racism is appalling, but the act of falsely charging racism undercuts the very causes of equality and tolerance.

As courageous as John McCain's life has been to date, the next three weeks may be his most heroic. He must do his duty and alert the public despite the "slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" that will be shot into his back as he does so. Once he has discharged that duty — and arranged for sufficient lawyers to protect the ballot boxes from what is likely to be an unprecedented campaign of attempted voter fraud — Sen. McCain may be confident that his honor will be intact. And he will be ready to serve as our 44th president.

Tony Blankley is executive vice president of Edelman public relations in Washington. E-mail him at TonyBlankley@gmail.com. To find out more about Tony Blankley and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
That Obama has found corruption in others and used that as a springboard to get to his present position is a poor reflection on politics and politicians, not on Obama. Your arguments have no merit, you are all throwing stones in a glass house. You point one finger but the other four point back at you. Your politician'sand choices have corrupted our society.
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:52 PM
Nothing but a pure hoax. McCain has outdone Lee Atwater and Carl Rove. Give them Sarah Palin, an extremely dangerous mind and spirit. I want to share what I recently sent to the remarkable Mr. Hannity which is actually my letter to the Palin base: 10/14/08 Mr. Hannity: It pains me to hear your screed and your bloviation each day. "The best lack all conviction, and the worst are full of passionate intensity..." This I think applies to you and the Palin base. Mr. McCain, not having a colleague of his own ilk, gives us the political publicity stunt, a hoax that is Ms. Palin. I hear that Ms. Palin has electrified the her base --- the fundamentalists, the triumphalists, the nativists , the plutocrats, the Charleston Hestonites, the hyper-patriots, the oligarchs, the jingoists, the slavers, the ethnocentrists, the crypto-facists, the authoritarian personality types. Have you seen on youtube that a visiting minister to Ms. Palin's church felt called to cast out witches from Ms. Palin. Am I to conclude that she was possessed by witches? Have you seen that Ms. Palin has been judged to have acted unethically by a commission in Alaska examining her conduct in office? Have you seen that Ms. Palin and her husband have been observed (there is evidence) to be trucking with a rabid group of people who want to break Alaska away from the United States? Is Ms. Palin a patriot or what? Can she be serious about questioning others' loyalty and judgment. I cannot believe she has been part of a group that hates the USA, but the evidence is there. How servile and sycophantish can one get Mr. Hannity? Admit your faults and Ms. Palin's. Your swaggering bluster would be amusing if it were not so full of mischief, unthruths and delusion. You are one of the deluders and time wasters on your great Disney owned American Broadcasting Co. Mr. Hannity, Rush and Savage and Billy Cunningham and O'Riley --- the whole lot of you being sponsored by the people that brought us Bambi and Snow White... If you and yours are not surreal, I don't know what surreal means. Please repent, recant, save yourself and confess on Saturday evening before Sunday. Can anyone tolerate the idea or possibility of Ms. Palin being president of the USA. Mind boggling, nightmarish,not believable, in no way allowable. Mr. McCain needs to not be president just so he will be unable to bring Ms. Palin close to the oval office.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Arthur
Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:02 PM
Sir;... perhaps you are right and lightning is striking in a timely fashion around Mr. Obama's carreer. I think I would take a hint and not stand too close. Maybe he did a deal with the devil!... Maybe he is owned by the emohbee. Maybe he is a tool of terrorists. Maybe he is just a tool. In any event if you choose to stand close to him there won't be much room for others, because like the guy studying to be an astronaut, you are taking up space. Lots of space...But not making much sense. You are making a lot of suggestions, not that the better man won, which might possibly be the case.... And it does happen. ...And something else,.. You seem to think it is wrong to hold the government accountable. The government  is not a single individual. None of these guys is Henry number seven, or Channel number five. They can be forgiven only because they are not able to escape from the ideas they hold that are a substitute for rational thought. They have principals. They have ideals. Good for them. They can afford them. If I had any principals I would trade them for a car or some other junk... Most people need ideas that work, or at least help them  to think. The political ideas abroad today are a substitute for thought They have ideas like capitalism or American ascendency -while we go broke- that have no relationship what so ever to reality. Capitalism soaks us,  and when we can't afford to support capital the government throws our futures at the failure to try to make it work. Take a hint... You have an idea...What good is it??? Only as good as it is true to reality. How useful is your idea??? As useful as it gets you into the future all together and in good shape. The ideas of government are failures. They don't pass any rational test. They are supposed to work so they are accepted as though they do work, when they don't work. False ideas do not work. Party politics do not work. Limited democracy does not work. Capitalism does not work.  I think government ought to be held responsible. They all want power but they shed responsibility...When the crap finds the lawn mower they all say I'm responsible...  What on earth does that mean??? Are they going to stand trial???  No; rather than have the thing work, they just use government to cover each other hoping the favor will be returned. There is no responsibility. Government is organized irresponsibility....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:03 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Tony Blankley
Dec. `11
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

4 May 2011 'Going Like a Child into the Dark'

11 Apr 2007 Iran's Nuke Program Advances

10 Dec 2008 Liberals Leave the Watchtowers of Freedom