creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

William F. Buckley (1925-2008)

Share Comment

Writing in 1954, Lionel Trilling said that most conservatives do not "express themselves in ideas but only in action or in irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas."

One of the perks of being a liberal is disdaining people who are not liberals. However, as of 1954, Trilling's dismissive attitude toward conservatives' intellectual landscape was painfully close to the truth.

Trilling wrote ten years after Friedrich Hayek's landmark counterattack against the left in his book "The Road to Serfdom." But that was a book with great impact on a relatively small number of people at the time, though its influence spread around the world over the years.

Trilling also wrote eight years before Milton Friedman's first book aimed at a popular audience — "Capitalism and Freedom" — and a quarter of a century before Rush Limbaugh pioneered conservative talk radio.

They say it is always darkest before the dawn. One year after Lionel Trilling's dismissal of conservative intellectual thought, William F. Buckley founded National Review, the first in a series of conservative journals of opinion that would build on its success.

In short, Bill Buckley revitalized conservatism, with his wit, his intellect, and his inimitable mannerisms that made him a TV icon as a guest on many programs, even before he created his own long-running program, "Firing Line."

Some people like to believe that objective forces shape history but the right person in the right place at the right time can change everything. William F. Buckley was that person when he burst on the scene at the nadir of conservative thought in the 1950s.

There were of course conservative journalists before Buckley, including irrepressible black conservative journalist George Schuyler who was writing decades before Bill Buckley.

In a similar vein, there were ballplayers who hit home runs before Babe Ruth, but not nearly as many home runs. William F. Buckley revolutionized the conservative intellectual scene as much as Babe Ruth revolutionized the way baseball was played.

Today we take it for granted that there are conservative journals of opinions like The Weekly Standard, The American Spectator, City Journal and of course the National Review.

We also take for granted that there are dozens of conservative talk radio programs, led by Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, as well as conservative columnists like Charles Krauthammer, George Will and many others.

But these things didn't just happen.

Somebody had to lead the way and that somebody was William F. Buckley.

The difference today is more than quantitative. The way the liberal media operate is very different, now that there is a conservative media — not as large, but large enough to puncture the liberals' pretensions and expose what they conceal.

There was a time when Walter Cronkite's version of what was happening in Vietnam was enough to force a change in policy more disastrous than the Communist offensive which Cronkite depicted as a big loss to American military forces, when in fact the American military inflicted a crushing defeat on the Communist guerrillas.

Imagine how differently that war might have turned out — how many millions of people in Southeast Asia might not have been slaughtered by Communist governments there — if there had been a sizable contingent of conservative journalists to tell a very different story from that told by Walter Cronkite and the liberal media.

By the same token, think how successful Cronkite's successor, Dan Rather, might have been with his fake documents about President Bush's National Guard service, broadcast on the eve of the 2004 elections, if the fraud had not been exposed immediately by conservatives on the Internet, on talk radio, and in newspapers.

In addition to his own personal contributions to the intellectual diversity of American life, William F. Buckley's pioneering opened the way for many others to add greatly to our intellectual diversity, the only kind of "diversity" that liberals seem to dislike, especially on our college campuses.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Thomas Sowell's recent opinion piece, labeled "Cold Water on 'Global Warming' in my local newspaper, gives us some typical "conservative" diatribe that allegedly supports the contention that global warming is either not happening or is not influenced by human activity. In his rant, he casually mentions a conference held in New York this week that was sponsored by the Heartland Institute, a calm and peaceful sounding name but masking its membership and its own funding.

The Heartland Institute has received $791,500 from ExxonMobil since 1998 and Walter F. Buchholtz, an ExxonMobil executive, serves as Heartland's Government Relations Advisor, according to Heartland's 2005 IRS Form 990, pg. 15. It is no benign coincidence that Exxon's corporate position, and that of many of its executives personally, is that global warming either doesn't exist or is not attributable to human activity. For Sowell to suggest that this was a gathering of anything more than lobbyists and camp followers in the mold of James Inhofe and others of like mind is ludicrous.

Thomas Sowell is one angry black man who got left behind during the civil rights movement and has been trying to ingratiate himself with the white majority in this country for some time. His arguments, for any regular readers of his column, are generally non-sequiturs and follow the "conservative" party line as if scripted. In the column cited, he makes the assertion without attribution "some scientists say that the warming created the increased carbon dioxide, rather than vice-versa." It is a literary trick right out of the pages of the Fixed News Channel where it is mantra for their interviewers to attack a guest with the phrase "some people say" without ever identifying those persons for a critical evaluation. Sowell repeats the tactic in order to free himself from having to produce facts and references that can be checked.

Concluding his article, and I do hope that you pass these comments along to him to let him know that even his darlings in red states don't always buy his song, he states "those who have a big stake in global warming hysteria are unlikely to show up at the conference in New York, and unfortunately that includes much of the media." It's one thing to have an opinion about what has already happened, but Sowell opines about things that may or may not happen and states them as facts that did or did not happen. You call this responsible journalism?

Now, the rebuttal, of course would be for Creators and Sowell to provide a follow-up to state how many people who had "big stakes" actually appeared (after all, why would any self-respecing scientists show up at a conference where the deck is stacked by Exxon and its non-scientists?) and what members of any media appeared to report on this non-event. My guess is that neither Creators nor Sowell will address what actually happened because it suits the agenda of both to avoid scrutiny for what is published.

Thomas Sowell: proof that God has a sense of humor.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mike Fitzwilliam
Fri Mar 7, 2008 3:17 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

15 Mar 2011 The 'Redevelopment' Hoax

3 Mar 2010 Alice in Health Care: Part III

30 Oct 2007 Political "Solutions"