creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
22 May 2012
A Book for Republicans

Democrats have been having a field day with the cry of "tax cuts for the rich" — for which … Read More.

22 May 2012
Big Lies in Politics

The fact that so many successful politicians are such shameless liars is not only a reflection on them, it is … Read More.

18 May 2012
A Racial Revolution?

Now that census data show — for the first time in American history — the number of white babies … Read More.

Union Myths

Share Comment

The biggest myth about labor unions is that unions are for the workers. Unions are for unions, just as corporations are for corporations and politicians are for politicians.

Nothing shows the utter cynicism of the unions and the politicians who do their bidding like the so-called "Employee Free Choice Act" that the Obama administration tried to push through Congress. Employees' free choice as to whether or not to join a union is precisely what that legislation would destroy.

Workers already have a free choice in secret-ballot elections conducted under existing laws. As more and more workers in the private sector have voted to reject having a union represent them, the unions' answer has been to take away secret-ballot elections.

Under the "Employee Free Choice Act," unions would not have to win in secret-ballot elections in order to represent the workers. Instead, union representatives could simply collect signatures from the workers until they had a majority.

Why do we have secret ballots in the first place, whether in elections for unions or elections for government officials? To prevent intimidation and allow people to vote how they want to, without fear of retaliation.

This is a crucial right that unions want to take away from workers. The actions of union mobs in Wisconsin, Ohio and elsewhere give us a free home demonstration of how little they respect the rights of those who disagree with them and how much they rely on harassment and threats to get what they want.

It takes world-class chutzpah to call circumventing secret ballots the "Employee Free Choice Act." To unions, workers are just the raw material used to create union power, just as iron ore is the raw material used by U.S. Steel and bauxite is the raw material used by the Aluminum Company of America.

The most fundamental fact about labor unions is that they do not create any wealth. They are one of a growing number of institutions which specialize in siphoning off wealth created by others, whether those others are businesses or the taxpayers.

There are limits to how long unions can siphon off money from businesses, without facing serious economic repercussions.

The most famous labor union leader, the legendary John L. Lewis, head of the United Mine Workers from 1920 to 1960, secured rising wages and job benefits for the coal miners, far beyond what they could have gotten out of a free market based on supply and demand.

But there is no free lunch.

An economist at the University of Chicago called John L. Lewis "the world's greatest oil salesman."

His strikes that interrupted the supply of coal, as well as the resulting wage increases that raised its price, caused many individuals and businesses to switch from using coal to using oil, leading to reduced employment of coal miners. The higher wage rates also led coal companies to replace many miners with machines.

The net result was a huge decline in employment in the coal mining industry, leaving many mining towns virtually ghost towns by the 1960s. There is no free lunch.

Similar things happened in the unionized steel industry and in the unionized automobile industry. At one time, U.S. Steel was the largest steel producer in the world and General Motors the largest automobile manufacturer. No more. Their unions were riding high in their heyday, but they too discovered that there is no free lunch, as their members lost jobs by the hundreds of thousands.

Workers have also learned that there is no free lunch, which is why they have, over the years, increasingly voted against being represented by unions in secret ballot elections.

One set of workers, however, remained largely immune to such repercussions. These are government workers represented by public sector unions.

While oil could replace coal, while U.S. Steel dropped from number one in the world to number ten, and Toyota could replace General Motors as the world's leading producer of cars, government is a monopoly. Nobody is likely to replace the federal or state bureaucracies, no matter how much money the unions drain from the taxpayers.

That is why government unions continue to thrive while private sector unions decline. Taxpayers provide their free lunch.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
Well done sir.
Comment: #1
Posted by: LF
Mon Mar 7, 2011 10:56 PM
I have been a member of 3 unions. During most of those years, it took 10 years to be "vested". That is, if one lost his job and did not work for 10 years in the union, his pension money was forfeited and paid out to one who was vested. So, at age 72 I have no union retirement. If that isn't robbery, nothing is.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mike Fuhrer
Tue Mar 8, 2011 11:13 AM
I read an interesting quote from John Lewis a few years ago and I'll try to find it and pass it on to you.
The jist of it however is that when told his demands would put coal miners out of work, he said he hoped so. His goal was to raise wages so high that mining companies would be forced to develop and implement technology in the mining of coal and that in the meantime coal miners would make enough money to send their children to college and that within a generation mining families would be out of the mines and mining towns.
If you look at how mining has changed in America since the 1960s, I'd say he was successful and we should be glad he was. A big mining accident in the U.S. claims 6 lives, that's a big deal. When a mining accident in China claims 2000-3000 that's just normal. I've read that there have been over 250,000 mining deaths in China since 1949.
Of course the rest of your discussion on unions is interesting and relevant. However, just to test your thesis a little, for example, while union workers were the big losers at GM, didn't the American consumer 1) vote with their dollars in a free market; and 2) "win" by choosing a superior product from Toyota?
I personally think GM declined because they turned out an inferior product (management's fault) at a higher cost (unions share the blame).
Comment: #3
Posted by: Scott Corner
Tue Mar 8, 2011 1:59 PM
While I agree that union voting should be done by secret ballot (to protect the workers from retaliation of the EMPLOYERS), the rest of Sowell's rant is illogical and highly insulting to working Americans. It is fitting that his given name is Tom.
Labor unions do represent the workers, and to characterize workers as "siphoning off wealth created by others" (presumably owners or executives) is an incredibly insulting statement. Earning a decent wage is now "stealing" from an employer?? Yes, a good labor union is able secure worker protections and wages that would otherwise be available through the "free market". This is precisely why unions are needed! Unions are necessary to ensure that workers are paid a decent wage, and that owners do not pocket all the profits that the workers have created. Sowell uses the typical economists' "free market" logic to state that higher wages equals higher prices. This is an economic law only if one completely ignores where the money for increased wages is supposed to come from: From the owners' profits!!!
So what is Sowell's solution? That Americans should work for lower wages and decreased benefits? Is that good for America? Should we work for 3rd-world wages so that U.S. companies can better compete internationally? This is a ludicrous notion. [Incidentally, laws prohibiting capital flight will solve the cheap international labor problem.]
Sowell then states that higher wages cause company shutdowns and layoffs. But exactly why do wish to keep companies that do pay decent wages, or do not ensure the safety of workers? What is the value f such a company to our people?? What was the value of a coal company that desecrates the land AND doesn't pay decent wages or benefits??
It is ironic that Sowell is an African American. Because to say company failures are the fault of workers demanding their fair share of the company profits is like saying southern plantation failures after the Civil War are the fault of slaves demanding their freedom. I am left to assume that Sowell looks upon the coal operations of the 1930s as great examples of how capitalism should work.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Ken B.
Wed Mar 9, 2011 6:14 PM
sorry - a few typos:
" .. a good labor union is able to secure worker protections and wages that would NOT otherwise be available..."
"... why do WE wish to kep companies that do NOT pay decent wages ...."
Comment: #5
Posted by: Ken B.
Wed Mar 9, 2011 6:22 PM
Thank you for your sound arguments, Mr. Sowell. Not everything you say falls on deaf ears!
Comment: #6
Posted by: julie craighead
Sun Mar 13, 2011 9:32 PM
Good Show
Comment: #7
Posted by: Tom Sommerfeldt
Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:17 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

21 Aug 2007 An Investment in Failure

17 Jan 2012 An Ignored 'Disparity': Part IV

18 Sep 2007 Mugged By Reality: Part III