creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

Republicans as Democrats

Share Comment

A brief glimmer of sanity among Congressional Republicans has been followed, almost immediately, by a return to the more traditional Washington insanity.

Last week, every single Republican in the House of Representatives voted against the Obama administration's "stimulus" package— which had stimulated an orgy of runaway spending by Congressional Democrats on everything from sports arenas to sexually transmitted diseases.

This was a rare smart move by the Republicans. If the Republicans had gone along, pursuing the will o' the wisp of "bipartisanship," then if the stimulus had by some miracle succeeded, it would have been a bill for which Democrats would claim credit at the next election.

On the other hand, if the stimulus failed— which seems far more likely— then it would be called a "bipartisan" bill, meaning that the Democrats would pay no price at the next election for a colossal failure.

Since President Bush started the "stimulus package" game, this was also an opportunity for Congressional Republicans to cut themselves loose from the political baggage of the Bush administration's unpopularity.

Within 24 hours, however, Republicans in the Senate came out with a plan to have the government fix mortgage interest rates at four percent— and use taxpayers' money to cover the losses that lenders would otherwise sustain.

It is painfully obvious that government intervention in the housing markets over the past several years has been at the heart of the boom and bust that has led to a huge economic downturn.

It was not the market, but the government, that pushed for abandoning traditional standards for making mortgage loans. That was what got both borrowers and lenders way out on a limb— and set off economic shock waves when the limb broke.

The last time the Republicans pushed for price controls was during the Nixon administration. It was very popular in the short run.

But, in the long run, even Nixon admitted in his memoirs that it was bad for the country.

Price controls have been tried and failed, in countries around the world, going all the way back to ancient Rome and Babylon. Moreover, politicians intervening in the economy is the hallmark of Democrats.

What principle separates the Republicans from the Democrats? If they are just Tweedledee and Tweedledum, then elections come down to personality and rhetoric. If that happens, you can bet the rent money on the Democrats winning.

Those considered to be the smart money among Republicans have been saying for some time that the party has to become more "inclusive" and jettison "outmoded" principles of the Reagan era. But no one has to pass an IQ test to be considered part of the smart money.

Looking at the track record, rather than the rhetoric, the smart money doesn't look nearly as smart.

When have the Republicans won big? When they stood for something and told the people what that something was.

Ronald Reagan was the classic example. But another example would be the stunning Republican victories in the 1994 Congressional elections, which put them in control of the House of Representatives for the first time in 40 years.

Articulating the message of Newt Gingrich's "contract for America" was a key to that historic victory.

Too many Republicans seem to think that being "inclusive" means selling out your principles to try to attract votes. It never seems to occur to them that you can attract a wider range of voters by explaining your principles in a way that more people understand.

That is precisely what Reagan did and what Gingrich did in 1994. Most Americans' principles are closer to those of the Republicans than to those of the Democrats.

It is the only advantage the Republicans have. The Democrats have the media, the unions, the environmental extremists and the tort lawyers on their side. Why should Republicans throw away their one advantage by becoming imitation Democrats?

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;...I have to disagree... In going on a straight party vote while the democrats did not, the republicans look like they put party before country, and before their own states and districts...Doing nothing all of a sudden when something, or anything was required was crazy, but par for the course... So now the republiclones look like the republiducks, and it is a shooting gallery out there... They get in line, and how does that help the country??? Makes me wish I was running as an independent against  my rep...The one thing the republicans isn't is independent... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Feb 3, 2009 5:44 PM

I'm quoting -"Obama warns of catastrophe if stimulus delayed! Obama urged members of Congress "to act without delay" while also promising to "work to make it stronger." WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS 'SCARE TACTIC' APPROACH? Politicians seem to stop at 'nothing' to steal Taxpayers money. IT'S TIME TO STOP THE 'SCARE TACTICS' BEING USED ON THE AMERICAN TAXPAYERS! JUST THINK, ONLY 40% working, paying Taxes, that have a job at present, 20% retired, the OTHER 40% living off social and welfare programs, never worked and don't intend to. The figures no longer add up for the high dollar politician's salaries and retirements. The 'tax & spenders' sold Americans' jobs, and 'GUESS WHAT, FOLKS, THERE AIN'T NO MORE MONEY!' It's time to cut politicians salaries and retirements to $12,000.00 year, pay off trillions of debt to foreign countries they sold America to. Incidentally, if Obama and the rest of the tax & spenders were so worried about the economy, why would they take high-dollar vacations, ride around in high dollar gas guzzlers with armed guards, stay/and or live in the most exclusive places, and 'rob' the few Taxpayers, that still have jobs at present, until they don't have enough money to pay their mortgages, let alone buy the necessities for their own families? GOES TO SHOW TAXPAYERS THEY ALL HAVE THEIR 'HANDS IN THE TIL' AND THAT 'NO ONES' BEEN CHECKING BEHIND ALL THESE 'FAT CATS' IN POLITICS WHO'S GETTING ALL THE EXTRAS FROM LARGE CORPORATIONS WANTING BAILOUTS AND HANDOUTS, AND NOW, AMERICA IS FACED WITH NOT BEING ABLE TO PAY THE INTEREST ON THE TRILLION DOLLAR NOTES THESE IGNORANT 'FAT CATS' BORROWED FOR THEMSELVES, WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF TAXPAYERS, AND THEY'RE NOW USING 'SCARE TACTICS' ON THE TAXPAYERS, SO THEY CAN 'STIMULATE' THEIR OWN DEEP POCKETS!' AMAZING? TAXPAYERS SAY '"KEEP 'GITMO' AS THESE 'FAT CATS' SHOULD BE CALLING THIS PRISON HOME!"
Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Wed Feb 4, 2009 10:40 AM
Professor Sowell, your column was persuasive, until the punchline turned out to be your same old song: all the beleaguered GOP has is the support of the people against the Democrats' big, bad media, unions, environmental extremists and tort lawyers. Why did you leave out the disabled, single moms, gay people, the unemployed, and people of color? Those Democrats are really a formidable machine. Poor Republicans! They have only the Religious Right, an army of xenophobes, the Health Care and Military Industrial Complexes, a huge majority among the economically comfortable, everybody who hates the poor,and our fear of another terrorist attack. You were once a pretty good economist, but your Social Darwinism has a natural tendency to make you the darling of our country's most extreme reactionaries. That ought to bother you.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mike Milligan
Fri Feb 6, 2009 5:54 AM
You and Larry Elder may God help u two uncle toms.
Comment: #4
Posted by: joe lee
Fri Feb 6, 2009 3:06 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

26 Aug 2010 "Moral Hazard" in Politics

2 Mar 2010 Alice in Health Care: Part II

18 Sep 2007 Mugged By Reality: Part III