opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
2 Feb 2016
After Iowa

Senator Ted Cruz's upset victory against Donald Trump has robbed "The Donald" of his stock answer to any … Read More.

2 Feb 2016
Random Thoughts

Random thoughts on the passing scene: Will this November's presidential election come down to a choice … Read More.

30 Jan 2016
Grow Up!

Of all the many things said about Donald Trump, what was said by Roger Ailes, head of the Fox News Channel, … Read More.

Racial Quota Fallout


Many years ago, I learned of an episode in the life of a promising young black man that is relevant to things happening now. He had been educated at a good school, and went on to receive degrees at good colleges and universities. Then he went for a Ph.D. in mathematics at one of the leading departments in that field.

When he encountered difficulties, his professors essentially wrote his doctoral thesis for him. No doubt they felt good about doing something to help a promising young black man, and perhaps took pride in doing so. But what about his pride?

This young man ended up joining an extremist group that hated white people.

Would it have been worse if he had not gotten a Ph.D. in math? Probably 99 percent of the people in this country, regardless of race, could not get a Ph.D. in math — and yet they can still live happy and fulfilling lives.

What recalled this episode from long ago was the current flurry of interest in a video of a young Barack Obama at the Harvard law school praising Derrick Bell, a black professor there, whose writings on "critical race theory" promoted an extremist hostility to white people.

Derrick Bell was for years a civil rights lawyer, but not an academic legal scholar of the sort who gets appointed as a full professor at one of the leading law schools. Yet he became a visiting professor at the Stanford law school and was a full professor at the Harvard law school.

It was transparently obvious in both cases that his appointment was because he was black, not because he had the qualifications that got other people appointed to these faculties. At Stanford, his students complained that his course on constitutional law was not up to the standards of the other courses they were taking.

Stanford at that time had one of the leading scholars in constitutional law, Professor Gerald Gunther — and Derrick Bell was no Gerald Gunther. A hastily created program of study of constitutional law was then used to teach that subject to students who were not getting what they needed in Professor Bell's course.

When this clever finessing of the problem came to light, the administration apologized — to Derrick Bell for the embarrassment this caused him.

They should have apologized to the law students for short-changing them with a professor who was not up to the job — and to those who donated money to the university to advance the cause of education, not to allow administrators to play racial quota politics on campus.

As a full professor at the Harvard law school, Derrick Bell was also surrounded by colleagues who were out of his league as academic scholars.

What were his options at this point?

If he played it straight, he could not expect to command the respect of either faculty or students at the Harvard law school — or, more important, his own self-respect. Bell himself admitted that he did not have the scholarly credentials that most full professors at the Harvard law school have.

There were no doubt other law schools where he would have been a respected colleague, but these were not Stanford or Harvard. Yet it is worth remembering that millions of people have led happy and fulfilling lives without ever being at Harvard or Stanford.

Derrick Bell's options were to be a nobody, living in the shadow of more accomplished legal scholars — or to go off on some wild tangent of his own, and appeal to a radical racial constituency on campus and beyond.

His writings showed clearly that the latter was the path he chose. His previous writings had been those of a sensible man saying sensible things about civil rights issues that he understood from his years of experience as an attorney. But now he wrote all sorts of incoherent speculations and pronouncements, the main drift of which was that white people were the cause of black people's problems.

Bell even said that he took it as his mission to say things to annoy white people. Perhaps he thought that was better than being insignificant in his academic setting. But it was in fact far worse, because the real damage was to impressionable young blacks who took him seriously, including one who went on to become President of the United States.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



6 Comments | Post Comment
I have watched and read about Mr. Sowell these last few weeks and have in my 68 years very rarely met or read anyone who is as forthright, concise and brilliant as this man.
His books will start lining my shelves to glean from this great man as much as I can before one of us steps off into eternity.
My only regret is in not knowing about him sooner in my travels.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Don
Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:59 PM
More than that, Dr. Sowell is a living embodiment of a man who has a powerful intellect, and, more important, wisdom to go with it.

A lot of leftie bookstores refuse to carry his books, while stuffing the shelves with the rantings of Childe Noam.
Comment: #2
Posted by: jaafar
Thu Mar 15, 2012 8:48 AM
Wow.. i love the honesty at which he speaks. Also, the fact that he speaks from experience with Bell is even more compelling. So,Obama is a product of Bell's purposeful decision to cause tension between black and whites. And now he holds the most powerful office in the world and the ability to enacts laws and policies. Scary ..... really scary...
Comment: #3
Posted by: Paul Kassey
Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:13 AM
Thomas Sowell has been a hero of mine for decades. His penetrating intellect and blunt honesty are the best at clearing the air of the "intellectual" fogs constantly being aimed at us by the liberal (Socialist) academic interest group.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Nick Pulskamp
Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:16 PM
On the day the Obama/Bell tapes were released as I watched snips of the video from many different forums one moment crystallized in my memory and I can't find it now. Some one, possibly Obama, is calling for Bell to be given the chair of something after someone else retires. It took all day to sink in but now I believe that the shenanigans Bell and Obama were up to were designed to further Bell's career. This feeling was reinforced by a comment someone made about the female black professor for whom Obama/Bell were supposedly fighting being (and remaining) totally opposed to their actions, and that her career never recovered. Is all that true.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Betty
Thu Mar 15, 2012 4:33 PM
In every generation (and every race or class) there are The Fringe -- individuals and groups whose irrational ideas are so obviously wrong that they eventually are ignored, rejected, forgotten -- and, in some cases, legally challenged, and even jailed for their actions. Sometimes, the force of the law or the military is necessary to stop them. The obvious extremes are too many -- Nazis, KKK, FMLN, Taliban, Weather Underground, Al-Qaeda, and communist terrorist organizations too many to count. These are tragedies and a sad embarrassment for the human race. But Thomas Sowell speaks directly of less obvious, less extreme, less violent but more insidious and corrosive elements of our society. White supremacists, black liberation theologians, progressive socialists, ELF and ALF, and even anarchists and many others are commonly heard, much to our sorrow. But the difference, today, is that there are few in the media and academia that challenge most of them -- particularly the 80% that is the liberal media -- and particularly those that are viewed as liberal. Thomas Sowell exposes the real story and the underlying problems that most of the media are unwilling to address and that allows the cancer to fester. My bookshelves are already lined with Dr. Sowell's work. I feel sorry for Derrick Bell -- but even more for a generation, including our president, lead so far astray.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Stu
Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 6 Feb 2016
diane dimond
Diane DimondUpdated 6 Feb 2016

18 Mar 2014 A Tiger of a Book

14 Nov 2012 The Need to Explain

25 Mar 2013 'Me Too' Republicans