creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

Primary Dilemmas

Share Comment

It is becoming increasingly and painfully clear that voters in both parties are having a hard time settling on a front runner.

Not only have different people won different primaries thus far, no one won a majority in any primary in either party — until Hillary Clinton, running virtually unopposed in the Michigan primary, received just over half the votes, while "uncommitted" received 40 percent.

What is wrong with this year's candidates?

The short answer is that most of the Republicans are questionable and all three leading Democrats are dangerous.

The only real conservative candidate is former Senator Fred Thompson but his low vote totals in all the Republican primaries thus far make him a one-man endangered species.

If he doesn't get some serious voter support in South Carolina, it is hard to see how he can become a viable candidate. And, if he drops out, it is hard to see who conservative Republican voters will support — either in the primaries or in the general election in November.

That raises the very serious possibility — and the very dangerous possibility — that Hillary Clinton will become President of the United States if conservative Republicans stay home on election day.

While Barack Obama and John Edwards have been irresponsible demagogues, the Clintons have a record of lawless and ruthless corruption that goes back not only to their White House days in the 1990s but even back to their time in the governors' mansion in Arkansas.

Nor is this simply a matter of domestic politics. It was Bill Clinton who ignored the advice of military and intelligence officials when he gave China the technology that can be used to enable their nuclear missiles to hit American cities.

It was Bill Clinton who gave the North Koreans help on their nuclear program in exchange for promises that have — predictably — proved worthless. This was just one of the dangerous problems that he swept under the rug and left for his successor.

People like this are not to be trusted with the highest office in the land in an era when Iran is moving toward nuclear weapons that can easily be turned over to international terrorists.

Conservatives should be the last ones to let the Clintons take control of the White House again, just because they cannot find an alternative candidate who meets all their desires.

It may not be emotionally satisfying to vote for the lesser of two evils but a lot depends on how bad the worse evil is.

Nobody running on the Republican ticket is as dangerous as the Clintons.

Some of the objections to former governor Mitt Romney raise a disquieting question as to whether religious differences alone are enough for some voters to pass up a candidate whom they would consider voting for otherwise.

It is one thing to say that particular policies of a candidate go against fundamental moral principles derived from your religion and something very different to be against a candidate whose actual policies are consistent with your principles but who simply attends a different church.

Would someone vote against Rudolph Giuliani because he is a Catholic? John F. Kennedy put that issue to rest nearly half a century ago.

Do we need to wait another half century before a Mormon can be judged on his record? Mitt Romney has a record as governor of Massachusetts and his father had a three-term record as government of Michigan.

Anybody's record can be attacked — and should be attacked, if you disagree with it. But that is wholly different from being against a candidate because his church differs from your church.

Mike Huckabee's record as governor of Arkansas — including his wholesale pardons of criminals and his raising of taxes — should not escape scrutiny because some voters belong to the same church he does.

Nor should he be singled out for attack by voters who go to a different church or to no church.

The stakes are too high to do anything other than select the best person available, even if none of the candidates seems ideal.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Mr. Sowell: I read your colunm yesterday, 1/20/07 in our local Sunday paper and I wasn't surprised to read that ,what I feel is happening in our small community is happening all over the country. I live in Charles Town, WV which is the county seat of Jefferson County WV. We are in the Eastern Panhandle and located just one hour from Balitmore and our nations capitol, Washington, D.C. Our county commission has been overrun by "no growthers" that oppose anything and everything that would provide positive income and affordable living opportunities to our residents. Over 60% of our residents must commute to find a decent job and when they do the income benefits are wiped out by the expensive cost of fuel and transportation. Plus, the stress of driving in bumper to bumper beltway traffic, leaving their homes before daylight and getting home after dark. Who knows the social cost to their children (since both parents usually work) and the potential loss of some great but mischevious minds. Every time a private group approaches our commission they are shot down. Recently a private group of investors, who owned a local limestone quarry(brownfield) had a great plan to clean it up and build office buildings and a hotel at one end of the water filled quarry. Now this quarry had provided jobs for hundreds of familys over the last century including both sides of my family. These families went to work everyday and got home early in the afternoon to their familys. They did not make millions of dollars BUT they did raise great children who often went on to college, started businesses or gained decent local jobs and who made our community the place that people wanted to come to and live in. These investors needed the quarry to be rezoned industrial. That's right, industrial. Somehow it had been zoned residential since the quarry shut down in the 1970's. These idealist ( 3 of 5 County Commissioners) used every ploy in the book to vote the measure down. Of course the had the assistance of the National Park Service in Harpers Ferry to help substantiate their votes. At the same time we were (including the local Chamber of Commerce) fighting for this effort other meetings were being held behind our back to submarine the whole project. I plan on sharing your article, with your permission of course, with others, who believe just as I do, that we must provide jobs locally and housing for our children and grandchildren. It was refreshing to read your colunm and to see that we are not alone in the realization that there are those who would trample our children into the ground just to see another $ 400,000 home go up on 20 acres all in the name of so called great crusades of one kind or another. The County commission is currently considering a zoning ordinance that matches the strictest in the country. Great opposition has risen to it but if past tendencies are any indication we will lose again to these people who get a check everyday without working a lick. Just to clear things up about myself. My family has run a successful Automobile dealership for over 40 years. We are currently located in the commercial area and I own a substantial amount of land that could benefit from the proposed ordinaces. Still, I cannot sit idily by and see our children leave our county so they can find a place to live. I am sorry this is so long but once I get going I cannot stop on this subject. I do better writing than verbalizing anyhow. I just wanted you to know that your colunm spread some light on what is going on around the country and that finally the actions by these "dogooders" has gotten the attention of others. Sincerely, Guy G. Chicchirichi, 304.279.0556
Comment: #1
Posted by: Guy G. Chicchirichi
Mon Jan 21, 2008 6:28 PM
nice page!great information!Nowdays,drugs are one of the biggest social ills facing many cultures today.However, once you have determined you have a problem, how do you choose a drug rehab center?here is the good news for you,guys.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
jackie
<a href="http://www.addictionlink.org/drug-rehab-center/west-virginia">west virginia drug rehab</a>
Comment: #2
Posted by: jackie
Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:36 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

29 Oct 2009 Dismantling America: Part II

7 Aug 2007 A Bridge Too Far Gone

9 Mar 2010 Stimulus or Sedative?