creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
22 May 2012
A Book for Republicans

Democrats have been having a field day with the cry of "tax cuts for the rich" — for which … Read More.

22 May 2012
Big Lies in Politics

The fact that so many successful politicians are such shameless liars is not only a reflection on them, it is … Read More.

18 May 2012
A Racial Revolution?

Now that census data show — for the first time in American history — the number of white babies … Read More.

Justice and Injustice

Share Comment

A heartbreaking social statistic is that children on welfare have only about half as many words per day directed at them as the children of working-class families— and less than one-third as many words as children whose parents are professionals. This is especially painful in view of the fact that scientists have found that the actual physical development of the brain is affected by how much interaction young children receive.

Even if every child entered the world with equal innate ability, by the time they were grown they would nevertheless have very different mental capabilities. Innate ability is the ability that exists at the moment of conception, but nobody applies for a job or for college admission at the moment of conception. Even between conception and birth, other influences affect the development of the brain, as well as the rest of the body.

The mother's diet and her intake of alcohol or drugs affects the unborn child. Differences in the amount of nutrition received in the womb create differences even between identical twins. Where one of these identical twins is born significantly heavier than the other, and the lighter one falls below some critical weight, the heavier one tends to have a higher IQ in later years. They may be the same weight when they become adults, but they didn't get the same nutrition back when their brains were first developing.

Inequalities have so many sources that this fact undermines the simple dichotomy between believing that some people are innately inferior and believing that discrimination or other social injustices account for economic and social differences. Yet people who are afraid of being considered racists, or believers that the lower classes are born inferior, often buy the notion that only the sins of "society" can explain why some people end up so much better off than others.

Decades ago, Edward Banfield pointed out how the different ways that children from different classes are raised helps or hinders them in their later life. Yet he was demonized by the intelligentsia for saying what most people would consider only common sense.

While it is heartbreaking to think of the large differences in ability and behavior that can be created by the way different parents raise their children, it is no less heartbreaking to think of other social differences that go back to the way kids are brought up.

For example, anyone who watches the television program "Cops" will see an endless succession of real losers who wreck their lives and the lives of others through sheer irresponsibility and lack of self-control.

When one of these losers is being chased on the highway by a couple of police cars, and with a police helicopter overhead, you wonder why he doesn't just stop and give it up before his crazy driving kills himself or someone else. But you also have to wonder what his parents were doing while he was growing up that they couldn't raise him to become a rational adult.

A majority of the men in prison came from fatherless families. In some cosmic sense, it may not be entirely their fault that they took the wrong road. But that doesn't change the fact that it was the wrong road— or make it any less dangerous to turn them loose.

No doubt such concerns are behind efforts to "rehabilitate" prisoners or substitute "crime prevention" programs instead of incarceration. But magic words do not create magic realities. Innocent people have been killed by "rehabilitated" criminals who had been set free. And "prevention" programs do not prevent anything other than putting dangerous people behind bars.

The pretense of having solutions can be more dangerous than the problem. Yet there are whole armies of shrinks and social workers, whose jobs depend on pretending that they have answers, even when no one has answers.

In terms of broader social policy, we need to make a sharp distinction between saying that some people are victims of a tragic fate and saying that they are victims of discrimination by employers, bias in the courts or the sins of other individuals they encounter. Scapegoating other people is not likely to help— and it can distract attention from the real problems, which are too serious to misdiagnose.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2000 CREATORS.COM


Comments

10 Comments | Post Comment
We have 7 million, about 1 in 32 of our citizens in the criminal justice system. (Jail, probation, parole) Our incarceration rate is the highest in the world. Something is obviously amiss here. Why are rates so much higher here than anywhere else in the world? Is the American character somehow the most defective in the world, producing the hordes of misfits for whom there is no other solution than prison? Are American criminals so much more resistant to turning their lives around than are criminals elsewhere that only long stays (often much longer than in other western countries) behind bars are the only solution that Mr. Sowell can see? As a taxpayer, I am a bit tired of footing the bill. Perhaps a bit of prevention is in order here.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mark
Mon May 24, 2010 11:17 PM
It's deja-vu all over again: forty, fifty years ago when Head Start was begun, we learned that children of the inner-city did not hear many words directed toward them except for commands. And research had established that children raised with few words did not easily learn to read, while children bathed in words took to reading. Head Start (free Pre-School programs) brought these kids into a world of words: books, story-telling, songs, speaking to others in sentences. What a pity that conservatives have now pretty-much defunded Head Start, call Pre-School Education "socialist indoctrination", and advocate leaving young kids isolated in the home in front of the TV.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Lilly
Tue May 25, 2010 5:13 AM
Another stellar post, Mr. Sowell. This post covers some of the same ground that Intellectuals and Society covers, on the efficacy of incarceration, which I found to be an excellent part of the book. Keep up the good work.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Nathan
Tue May 25, 2010 6:53 AM
Dear Lilly,
Head Start was basically defunded because after all the money spent over all those years made no change in the test scores or ability of the children involved. Basically it became a very expensive taxpayer funded day care. Look up the study figures yourself, though I know it's easier to just blame conservatives.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Joe Heckmann
Tue May 25, 2010 7:31 AM
Re: Lilly check comment #4
Comment: #5
Posted by: Joe Heckmann
Tue May 25, 2010 7:33 AM
Re: Mark
We have so many in prison as a direct result of the drug war. 800,000 people were arrested last year for possession only marijuana offenses.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Nathan
Tue May 25, 2010 7:46 AM
I address this to Lilly: Head Start has been discredited on a national basis. It used false statistics to justify its existence, it has been revealed to be of no discernable advantage to the kids who went through it based on the testing of 4th graders nationwide. The false data, boondoggle expenses, and deceit that the program unleashed on the public is execrable. Through my own personal involvement in "education" for more than 40 years, I have watched the liberal relaxation of standards and values destroy what was once the Cadillac of educational systems. Lilly, your prose and your ideas are strong testament to the sorrowful state of education today.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Jobe
Tue May 25, 2010 9:58 AM
foo
Comment: #8
Posted by: foo
Tue May 25, 2010 10:53 AM
@Mark and @Nathan: Spot on, Nathan. We incarcerate many individuals for non-violent crimes like lighting up a joint. Prohibition should have taught us something about this.

Then there is the point that Dr. Sowell indirectly makes about personal responsibility for not only our actions, but our actions (and involvement) with our children. Often times many want to blame society for an individual's problems, when the parents - and lack of parents - hold a large part of that blame.
Comment: #9
Posted by:
Tue May 25, 2010 11:41 AM
I have spent much time explaining to whomever that in most cases various government agencies have escalated probvlems in our society to make themselves more important rather than actually having any real impact on the rising difficulties associated with sociopathic behaviors in our society.
Comment: #10
Posted by: John C. Davidson
Tue May 25, 2010 3:26 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

13 Sep 2011 Back to the Future: Part II

28 Apr 2009 Survival Optional

14 Dec 2007 Say It Ain't So