creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

False Solutions and Real Problems

Share Comment

Someone once said that Senator Hubert Humphrey, liberal icon of an earlier generation, had more solutions than there were problems.

Senator Humphrey was not unique in that respect. In fact, our present economic crisis has developed out of politicians providing solutions to problems that did not exist— and, as a result, producing a problem whose existence is all too real and all too painful.

What was the problem that didn't exist? It was a national problem of unaffordable housing. The political crusade for affordable housing got into high gear in the 1990s and led to all kinds of changes in mortgage lending practices, which in turn led to a housing boom and bust that has left us in the mess we are now trying to dig out of.

Usually housing affordability is measured in terms of how much of the average person's income it takes to cover either apartment rent or a monthly mortgage payment.

There were certainly places here and there where it took half a family's income just to put a roof over their heads. Many such places were in coastal California but there were a few others, here and there, on the east coast and elsewhere.

But, vast areas of the country in between— "flyover country" to the east coast and west coast elites— had housing prices that took no larger share of the average American's income than in the decade before the affordable housing crusade got under way.

Why then a national crusade by Washington politicians over local problems? Probably as good an answer as any is that "It seemed like a good idea at the time." How are we to be kept aware of how compassionate and how important our elected officials are unless they are busy solving some problem for us?

The problem of skyrocketing housing prices was all too real in those places where this problem existed. When you have to live on half your income because the other half goes for housing, that's a real downer.

Almost invariably, these severe local problems had local causes— usually severe local restrictions on building homes.

These restrictions had a variety of politically attractive names, ranging from "open space" laws and "smart growth" policies to "environmental protection" and "farmland preservation."

Like most wonderful-sounding political slogans, none of these lofty goals was discussed in terms of that one four-letter word that people do not use in polite political society— "cost."

No one asked how many hundreds of thousands of dollars would be added to the cost of an average home by "open space" laws, for example. Yet empirical studies have shown that land-use restrictions added at least a hundred thousand dollars to the average home price in dozens of places around the country.

In some places, such as coastal California, these restrictions added several hundred thousand dollars to the price of the average home.

In other words, where the problem was real, local politicians were the cause. National politicians then tried to depict this as a national problem that they would solve.

How would they solve it? By pressuring banks and other lenders to lower their requirements for making mortgage loans, so that more people could buy houses. The Department of Housing and Urban Development gave the government-sponsored enterprise Fannie Mae quotas for how many mortgages it should buy that were made out for people for low to moderate incomes.

Like most political "solutions," the solution to the affordable housing "problem" took little or no account of the wider repercussions this would entail.

Various economists and others warned repeatedly that lowered lending standards meant more risky mortgages. Given the complex relationships among banks and other financial institutions, including many big Wall Street firms, if mortgages started defaulting, all the financial dominoes could start falling.

These warnings were brushed aside. Politicians were too busy solving a national problem that didn't exist. In the process, they created very real problems. Now they are now offering even more solutions that will undoubtedly lead to even bigger problems.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke, stated and I'm quoting 'We really had no choice
in bailout of AIG!' Yes, Mr. Bernanke, you did have a choice! When AIG
received first bailout, why weren't strict guidelines imposed on them; such
as, NO MORE BONUSES, cut 'CEO fat cat' salaries, freebies, and retirements
to maximum $25,000.00 year. Older employees, offer them an early retirement
package! All other salaries to be cut by at least one-quarter, as a slice of
the pie is better than no slice at all! Mr. Bernanke this includes you and
the rest of politicians! The other option would have been to let AIG file
bankruptcy so they could start over, and maybe this time they would be more
concerned and knowledgeable of what it takes to run a company by tightening
their pocketbooks! You see, Mr. Bernanke, bad choices is what's put America
into Bankruptcy and borrowing money from foreign countries that we can't pay
the interest on! Where's the common sense in these matters?

Taxpayers understand Bay of Thailand is buying AIG Retail Bank Company and
deal is to be completed April 2009. Since this is really Taxpayers money,
will you and rest of politicians make sure AIG pay off the trillions of
dollars borrowed, without Taxpayers' consent, to foreign countries?

That brings Taxpayers to the latest for AIG's bonuses and the statement "If
we don't pay them big bonues, they'll sue us!" How dumb you are? It's
Taxpayers' money, not yours to give! It's time for for AIG, Freddie, Fannie,
Banks, Automakers and anyone else standing in line taking Taxpayers money to
immediately file Bankruptcy! Enough is Enough!

President Obama's top economic advisers vigorously defends his 3.6 trillion
budget! News flash for you -- "Taxpayers don't defend this nor any of the
so-called put people back to work programs, called infrastructures. I just
left a meeting in which one of the 'economic advisers' from a bank stated he'd
been in DC for a week!" I asked him why he thought America needed
infrastructures if we didn't bring textile and furniture manufacturing jobs
back to America? He stated 'they' didn't discuss this, just infrastructures!
Remember, these large banks like Citicorp, Wachovia, etc. were bailed out!
Taxpayers wonder why we're bailing them out if politicians continue allowing
the 'economic' idiots to advise them. He had no answers! Guess what, Mr.
Economic Adviser was hoping the floor would open up and I'd fall through it!
You see, all the expert politicians and economists know as much about
'thrifty management' as a newborn and this, folks, is the reason for Change
and not Obama's change methods, either!

There seems to be a lot of 'experts' in government and financial
institutions with no common sense. It's time to run America like a private
business; meaning, President, Vice-President, Secretary, and Treasurer. All
these cabinet members collecting huge salaries and benefits will have to
come to an end. Taxpayers know it's time to cut salaries to $12,000.00
yearly for all politicians. After all, these Public Servant jobs give less
than 30 days of service and, in today's world of mismanagement, deceit and
greed, so this is more money than they deserve.

Why aren't we prosecuting the people handing out Taxpayers monies and the
people who's receiving it? The reasons being very clear-who's collecting and
benefiting!

WAKE UP AMERICA!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:04 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

2 Oct 2007 Columbia, Duke and the Media

21 Dec 2010 Random Thoughts

7 Sep 2010 A Non-Prediction