creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
28 Oct 2014
Random Thoughts

Random thoughts on the passing scene: The great boxing champion Joe Louis once said about one of his opponents,… Read More.

21 Oct 2014
Predatory Journalism

The New York Times is again on the warpath against what it calls "predatory lending." Just what is predatory lending?… Read More.

14 Oct 2014
Local or National Elections?

Speaker of the House Tip O'Neill once said, "All politics is local." That may have been true in Tip O'Neill's day,… Read More.

Debt-Ceiling Chicken

Comment

The big news, as far as the media are concerned, is the political game of debt-ceiling chicken that is being played by Democrats and Republicans in Washington. But, however much the media are focused on what is happening inside the Beltway, there is a whole country outside the Beltway — and the time is long overdue to start thinking about what is best for the rest of the country, not just for right now but for the long haul.

However the current debt-ceiling crisis turns out, the current economic turmoil in financial markets around the world should cause some serious thoughts about the long run, and about the whole idea of a national debt-ceiling.

Some people may have been shocked when the credit-rating firm Moody's recently suggested that the debt-ceiling law be repealed, in order to avoid fiscal crises which can throw world financial markets into turmoil that can injure countries around the world.

Anyone who wants to show that Moody's is wrong should be prepared to show the actual benefits of the debt-ceiling, not its goals or hopes. That will not be easy, if possible at all.

Too many policies, programs and institutions are judged by what they are supposed to do, rather than by what they actually do and the consequences of their actions. The United Nations, for example, survives as a glorious idea, despite how corrupt, counterproductive and even dangerous its actions are.

The national debt-ceiling law should be judged by what it actually does, not by how good an idea it seems to be. The one thing that the national debt-ceiling has never done is to put a ceiling on the rising national debt. Time and time again, for years on end, the national debt-ceiling has been raised whenever the national debt gets near whatever the current ceiling might be.

Regardless of what it is supposed to do, what the national debt-ceiling actually does is enable any administration to get all the political benefits of runaway spending for the benefit of their favorite constituencies — and then invite the opposition party to share the blame, by either raising the national debt ceiling, or by voting for unpopular cutbacks in spending or increases in taxes.

The Obama administration is a classic example.

When all its skyrocketing spending bills were being rushed through Congress without even being read, the Democrats had such overwhelming majorities in both the Senate and the House of Representatives that Republicans had all they could do to get a word in edgewise — even though their words had no chance of stopping, or even slowing down, the spending of trillions of dollars.

Now that the bill is coming due for all that spending and borrowing, Republicans are suddenly being invited in to share the blame for either raising the national debt ceiling or for whatever other unpopular measures will be legislated.

Many years ago, someone said, "If you didn't invite me to the big take-off, don't invite me to the crash landing." This was Obama's big spending spree, but "bipartisanship" requires Republicans to either split the bill or be blamed if the government shuts down or defaults.

What would happen if there were no national debt-ceiling law?

Those who got the political benefits from handing out trillions of dollars of the taxpayers' money (plus borrowed money) would also get the clear and sole blame for the resulting skyrocketing national debt and all the unpopular consequences.

Those people who want serious and substantial spending cuts are absolutely right in what they want. There are not only government programs that need to be cut but whole government agencies, including Cabinet-level Departments, that are not merely useless but positively harmful on net balance.

There are a lot of things that could be cut, and should be cut, instead of defaulting on the nation's debts. But that is not likely to happen, if Obama and his media chorus can instead blame the Republicans for forcing a government shutdown or a credit default.

Regardless of how the current crisis is resolved, Moody's suggestion of repealing the national debt-ceiling law deserves some very serious thought, because that law is the crucial factor in the political games that allow big spenders to blame others for the consequences of their own irresponsibility.

Those who say that the reckless spending and reckless borrowing of the Obama administration are the roads to ruin are absolutely right.

Too many policies and institutions are judged by what they are supposed to do, rather than by what they actually do.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
The consumate solution is clearly illustrated here once again by the most eloquent consverative voice on the planet. Thank you again Mr. Sowell. Too bad you couldn't have convinced Colin Powell to run for president instead of the current foreigner in office. Cheers.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Rik
Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:07 AM
I am a great fan of your work and your thoughts on economic systems. Reading this article baffles me a little. Here you put the debt crisis blame on the Obama administration and it seems you suggest that no previous administrations had any part in the debt crisis. You at least do not acknowledge any other administrations part in it.
How can the Republicans not share the blame? Was the debt in control when the Obama administration came into office? Should Republicans not take any responsibility for the years of spending in a war that no one understood the reasons for its longevity?
These questions are not rhetorical, I'm seriously asking if it's truly fair to blame Obama for this situation. And don't get me wrong. I'm not a liberal voice, I am a conservative that tries to look at things honestly.
Comment: #2
Posted by: April
Wed Jul 27, 2011 6:21 AM
Re: April
I believe Mr. Sowell is using the current administration as an example, not blaming it entirely. He could have easily chosen any administration, but since the mood of the country is focused on the now, this administration is the best illustration. The more important point of the article is WHY we have the debt ceiling, and WHY our government has abused it's powers, not WHICH administration should be assigned blame.

We as a nation need to wake up and understand that it has taken decades of abuse to get to this point, but we are here and we need to fix the problem now. The debt ceiling debate is a farce and no matter if it is raised or not,our lack of credit worthiness has been exposed, so our debt will be downgraded. Our government has shown to the investing world that we can not manage our accounts.

I applaud Mr. Sowell for his honesty.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Linda
Fri Jul 29, 2011 8:59 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Oct. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 3 Nov 2014
Brent Bozell
Linda Chavez
Linda ChavezUpdated 31 Oct 2014

23 Jun 2010 A Sad Day

2 Oct 2007 Columbia, Duke and the Media

28 Jun 2011 Is Democracy Viable?