creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

De-Programming Students

Share Comment

Letters from parents often complain of a sense of futility in trying to argue with their own children, who have been fed a steady diet of the politically correct vision of the world, from elementary school to the university.

Some ask for suggestions of particular books that might make a dent in the know-it-all attitude of some young people who have heard only one side of the story in classrooms all their lives.

That is one way of going about trying to de-program young people. There are, for example, some good books showing what is wrong with the "global warming" crusades or showing why male-female differences in income or occupations are not automatically discrimination.

Various authors have written a lot of good books that demolish what is currently believed— and taught to students— on a wide range of issues. Some of those books are listed as suggested readings on my website (www.tsowell.com).

Yet trying to undo the propaganda that passes for education at too many schools and colleges, one issue at a time, may not always be the best strategy. There are too many issues on which the politically correct party line is considered to be the only way to look at things.

Given the wide range of issues on which students are indoctrinated, instead of being educated, trying to undo all of that would require a whole shelf full of books— and somehow getting the students to read them all.

Another approach might be to respond to the dogmatic certainty of some young person, perhaps your own offspring, by asking: "Have you ever read a single book on the other side of that issue?"

Chances are, after years of being "educated," even at some of the highest-priced schools and colleges, they have not.

When the inevitable answer to your question is "No," you can simply point out how illogical it is to be so certain about anything when you have heard only one side of the story— no matter how often you have heard that one side repeated.

Would it make sense for a jury to reach a verdict after having heard only the prosecution's case, or only the defense attorney's case, but not both?

There is no need to argue the specifics of the particular issue that has come up.

You can tell your overconfident young student that you will be happy to discuss that particular issue after he or she has taken the elementary step of reading something by somebody on the other side.

Elementary as it may seem that we should hear both sides of an issue before making up our minds, that is seldom what happens on politically correct issues today in our schools and colleges. The biggest argument of the left is that there is no argument— whether the issue is global warming, "open space" laws or whatever.

Some students may even imagine that they have already heard the other side because their teachers may have given them their version of other people's arguments or motives.

But a jury would never be impressed by having the prosecution tell them what the defendant's defense is. They would want to hear the defense attorney present that case.

Yet most students who have read and heard repeatedly about the catastrophes awaiting us unless we try to stop "global warming" have never read a book, an article or even a single word by any of the hundreds of climate scientists, in countries around the world, who have expressed opposition to that view.

These students may have been shown Al Gore's movie "An Inconvenient Truth" in school, but are very unlikely to have been shown the British Channel 4 television special, "The Great Global Warming Swindle."

Even if we assume, for the sake of argument, that students are being indoctrinated with the correct conclusions on current issues, that would still be irrelevant educationally. Hearing only one side does nothing to equip students with the experience to know how to sort out opposing sides of other issues they will have to confront in the future, after they have left school and need to reach their own conclusions on the issues arising later.

Yet they are the jury that will ultimately decide the fate of this nation.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Mr. Howell,
The answer to your baseball question : Shoeless Joe Jackson. I confess that I am blissfully unaware of anything related to baseball and got the answer from google so I can have a shot at getting your book !
Thanks
- Kamath
Comment: #1
Posted by: Padmanabha Kamath
Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:19 AM
I'm not sure if you are complaining about education and teachers, or the issue of Global warming and Al Gore, either way you have no expertise in either subject. You are in my view one of the sources of the problem in this country, and you article expresses that fairly well. You are a columnist who writes with a one-sided view asking us to look at “both sides” as you promote your side. Self-interested idealogues offer nothing to the improvement of our society.

I have been a teacher for many years and I do not recall a situation in my experience where a teacher set out to “indoctrinate” a student/students to their belief. Does it occur? Probably. Any profession has its share of those who abuse their position. Of all the concerns facing education and teachers this is a complete non-issue. Students will always be exposed to a variety of viewpoints and teaching styles due to the individuality of each teacher.

My goal in the classroom has always been not to offend or belittle student views. I generally welcome any opinion because a student with any opinion who is willing to voice it is rarer than it should be. I have always had a mixture of political persuasions in my class just as we do in society at large. That to me is the basic proof of the inanity of your argument: America is essentially evenly divided along conservative and liberal lines. If our schools were “indoctrinating” students to the politically correct views of teachers then the result would be an overwhelmingly liberal sided society.

The American public faces many problems these days but in my opinion this is not one of them. Teachers overwhelmingly do their best to educate their students and set them up for a successful life. Whether or not we are turning out democrats or republicans is the least of our concerns or worries.

Comment: #2
Posted by: mike
Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:53 PM
Professor Sowell, the strategy I have always found most effective in convincing anyone, including my six children (all now young adults) has been to suggest they consider the source of their information. What are the informant's qualifications, agenda, associations, record of accuracy, and reputation? Why do you consider him or her reliable? You're a good example of why that approach is useful. If any of my children should ever be stupid enough to get opinions from any of your current popular writing, I'd merely point out your track record. You started out as a brilliant economist with provocative opinions based on impressive research. You attracted quite a following among people who shared your opposition to governmental attempts to level the economic playing field. However, your supporters were mostly comfortable beneficiaries of the tilted playing field, including "Joe-the-plumber" type wannabes. You sold out to that crowd, and now you're their designated expert on everything from global warming to the supposed perfidy of anybody who disagrees with your claque about anything. Perhaps your problem with young people is that they don't find you persuasive at all.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mike Milligan
Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:03 AM
There is a logical fallacy in Mr. Sowell's strategy for partents coping with "liberally indoctrinated" students: What happens when the student says, "Well, mom, have you seen "An Inconvenient Truth" or are you only parroting what you've heard on Rush Limbaugh?" Mr. Sowell is obviously giving too much credit in the assumption that the parents themselves have gone to primary sources on both sides of whatever issue and then come to their own idealogical conclusion based on logic. In fact, almost no one basis opinion on having gathered information from primary sources. Does Mr. Sowell indirectly suppose that it's ok for the parents to just repeat what they have heard in the mass media because the conclusion is a conservative one, but it's not ok for students to do the same because the conclusion is a liberal one? Either way, no one is making an opinion based on studying logical, scientific facts.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Andria Schulz
Sun Feb 15, 2009 11:34 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

21 Sep 2010 Penny-Wise on Crime

24 May 2011 Dependency and Votes

24 Aug 2010 Medical Care Facts and Fables