creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part II

"Often wrong but never in doubt" is a phrase that summarizes much of what was done by Presidents … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The 'Progressive' Legacy

Although Barack Obama is the first black President of the United States, he is by no means unique, except for … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
The Progressive Legacy: Part III

The same presumptions of superior wisdom and virtue behind the interventionism of Progressive Presidents … Read More.

"Intellectuals"

Share Comment

Among the many wonders to be expected from an Obama administration, if Nicholas D. Kristof of the New York Times is to be believed, is ending "the anti-intellectualism that has long been a strain in American life."

He cited Adlai Stevenson, the suave and debonair governor of Illinois, who twice ran for president against Eisenhower in the 1950s, as an example of an intellectual in politics.

Intellectuals, according to Mr. Kristof, are people who are "interested in ideas and comfortable with complexity," people who "read the classics."

It is hard to know whether to laugh or cry.

Adlai Stevenson was certainly regarded as an intellectual by intellectuals in the 1950s. But, half a century later, facts paint a very different picture.

Historian Michael Beschloss, among others, has noted that Stevenson "could go quite happily for months or years without picking up a book." But Stevenson had the airs of an intellectual — the form, rather than the substance.

What is more telling, form was enough to impress the intellectuals, not only then but even now, years after the facts have been revealed, though apparently not to Mr. Kristof.

That is one of many reasons why intellectuals are not taken as seriously by others as they take themselves.

As for reading the classics, President Harry Truman, whom no one thought of as an intellectual, was a voracious reader of heavyweight stuff like Thucydides and read Cicero in the original Latin. When Chief Justice Carl Vinson quoted in Latin, Truman was able to correct him.

Yet intellectuals tended to think of the unpretentious and plain-spoken Truman as little more than a country bumpkin.

Similarly, no one ever thought of President Calvin Coolidge as an intellectual. Yet Coolidge also read the classics in the White House. He read both Latin and Greek, and read Dante in the original Italian, since he spoke several languages. It was said that the taciturn Coolidge could be silent in five different languages.

The intellectual levels of politicians are just one of the many things that intellectuals have grossly misjudged for years on end.

During the 1930s, some of the leading intellectuals in America condemned our economic system and pointed to the centrally planned Soviet economy as a model— all this at a time when literally millions of people were starving to death in the Soviet Union, from a famine in a country with some of the richest farmland in Europe and historically a large exporter of food.

New York Times Moscow correspondent Walter Duranty won a Pulitzer Prize for telling the intelligentsia what they wanted to hear— that claims of starvation in the Ukraine were false.

After British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge reported from the Ukraine on the massive deaths from starvation there, he was ostracized after returning to England and unable to find a job.

More than half a century later, when the archives of the Soviet Union were finally opened up under Mikhail Gorbachev, it turned out that about six million people had died in that famine— about the same number as the people killed in Hitler's Holocaust.

In the 1930s, it was the intellectuals who pooh-poohed the dangers from the rise of Hitler and urged Western disarmament.

It would be no feat to fill a big book with all the things on which intellectuals were grossly mistaken, just in the 20th century— far more so than ordinary people.

History fully vindicates the late William F.

Buckley's view that he would rather be ruled by people represented by the first 100 names in the Boston phone book than by the faculty of Harvard.

How have intellectuals managed to be so wrong, so often? By thinking that because they are knowledgeable— or even expert— within some narrow band out of the vast spectrum of human concerns, that makes them wise guides to the masses and to the rulers of the nation.

But the ignorance of Ph.D.s is still ignorance and high-IQ groupthink is still groupthink, which is the antithesis of real thinking.

To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com. Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His Web site is www.tsowell.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

16 Comments | Post Comment
Mr. Sowell I've been a reader of yours for approximately eight months and love everything you write!
I simply wish to point out your use of the Ukraine is incorrect in this article and is simply the sovereign nation
since 1911 Ukraine http://www.infoukes.com/faq/the_ukraine/ My Wife is Ukrainian and so I suppose I put particular attention to this country more than I otherwise would.

Respectfully,
Comment: #1
Posted by: Blues Buckholz
Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:10 AM
Dear Tom,

I just moved and have a new community newspaper. I read one of your columns before the election and then Another liberal dose today.

What strikes me so is the anger and not the profoundness in your writing. Why can you not be profound with your writing and make me think? You write with such shrillness yet truly I hoped for a moment you would be proud of America for rescuing us from 8 years of disrespect for our government by the government. Do you not understand what a painful and long wait we have had for transparency, truth, a servant leader who just may help us get our hope back for a nation torn asunder by a failed economy and a war based on false premise and a loss of civility across the land?

Please think of elevating your writing to conservative greatness like Reston of the NYTimes or George Will who I disagree with and makes me think. When I read your writing I am always stunned by how meanspirited you seem to feel. We want to be inspired, we want to enjoy our pure joy. We want the best in America back. Help form a new party that is articulate, honest, bipartisan, inclusive that is a community of citizens and then ask us to get involved to make us great again. The self serving is over. And you need to help us get there.

I am going to send you an email from my friends brother. He is a Republican and he is they way I prayed to be if John McCain had been elected.

I will pray for the sake of our nation that you too will advocate for its greatness and elevate your writing to a higher standard.

Sincerely,

Jacqueline Simonds
jacquie.simonds@gmail.com
Comment: #2
Posted by: jacqueline h. simonds
Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:32 PM
>> Well, we have a new president. I didn't vote for him and I don't favor much of his political platform. But I am an American and I love my country. And Barack Obama is my president so I will give him the benefit of the doubt and will get behind him as best I can. He is certainly an impressive individual. He is young and bright. He is articulate. He is energetic, and he exalts high ideals for our country. He is certainly capable of strong leadership and I hope and pray that he makes the right decisions for the long term prosperity, strength, safety and stability of the USA. This is a wonderful country. I love its history and its possibilities. Although Pam and I were not in Barack Obama's corner, we could not help but feel proud to be Americans in seeing the first African American elected as our president, symbolizing the great distance we have come since America's slavery in the 1700-1800's and the civil rights disorders of the 1960's. I have an Indian friend (from India) who said "America is the only country in the world that this could happen in, where a majority race in a country elects a minority in that country to be its leader." I am an optimist at my core, and I believe in all that is right and good at the core of most Americans. Hopefully, Barack Obama can tap into this and can be the right choice for America at this time. There is much hope. Love to all, Dad/CG

Comment: #3
Posted by: jacqueline h. simonds
Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:38 PM
Dear Mr Sowell:

I believe that we have a confussion between the narrow knowledge of the specialist with the holistic wisdom of the wise.

I could not put it better than you already did in you article:

The outspoken specialist or intellectual speaks loud in one dialect only
while
The quiet wise like past President Coolidge are silent in most human languages
Comment: #4
Posted by: JOSE JOAQUIN PEREZ KRUMENACKER
Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:35 PM
Mr. Sowell: I'm tempted to make some lame remark about a distinguished intellectual such as you engaging in what might be regarded as an exercise in self-loathing but I'll skip it. I'm not a shrink.
Nor am I an intellectual. But I do have the requisite reading-grade level not to have misunderstood Nicholas Kristof's point, as you did. He wasn't arguing the case for philosopher kings. He was simply pointing out the deep strain of anti-intellectualism in American culture which seems to me to be an historical fact. Kristof sees the election of Barack Obama as a welcome break from that tradition. I suspect it is all the more gratifying to Kristof that the victory was achieved over opponents who made a point of mocking "eloquence" as a kind of moral deficiency and "words" as vacuous substitutes for action. Intellectuals are far from perfect, but anti-intellectualism is hardly a cultural strength as you imply. Anti-intellectualism leads easily to the transformation of a Joe the Plumber to social theorist within a day; it laughs at the notion of fruit flies being used in genetic research; and through sheer sophistry rationalizes a feckless, irresponsible and dangerous choice for Vice President.
Incidentally, William F. Buckley preferred to be governed by 400 (not 100) of the first names in the Boston phone directory rather than 400 members of the Harvard faculty. (Happily, that was not our choice in this past election.) Although other numbers have been bandied about, the only reference to 100 I could find is yours and Ann Coulter's. I found this to be curious: you're giving yourself away here, and if you're not careful about sources your intellectual bona fides -- impeccable until now -- could be called into question. My hunch is that you'd like to keep them intact, in spite of your rather snarky outburst against your peers.
Comment: #5
Posted by: dean scaros
Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:55 AM
Re: jacqueline h. simonds

Tom, this woman is a perfect example of the high-minded ignoramus. Your article was not mean in any way, she was just offended because you touched her right where she lives. Liberals hate truth as vampires hate sunlight.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Jason
Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:43 AM
Dear Mr. Sowell,
I have read your columns over the years and have often found them absolutely dead-on accurate. One comment in this column that is particularly germane is "But the ignorance of Ph.D.s is still ignorance and high-IQ groupthink is still groupthink, which is the antithesis of real thinking". I am a Ph.D. Chemist and despair of the self-reinforcing group think of many of my colleagues who believe that their narrow field of expertise makes them somehow expert on foreign relations, social remodeling. political science and constitutional law.
I believe that the best rejoinder to this type of thought was a comment I once saw on a Dick Cavett show. Mr. Cavett was being praised effusively by a guest who commented on how brilliant he was to have gone to Yale (I believe it was Yale but could be in error). Cavett's response was dead on "Madam, some of the stupidest people I know graduated from Yale"
Keep up the good work--we need clear thought now more than ever
Comment: #7
Posted by: Hazmatwa
Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:56 AM
Dr. Sowell, since you refer to the ease of writing a book on the many mistakes of the liberal intellectuals elitists... would you please write it? I'd love to, but I'm not as smart as you. You could make a big bathroom reading book, or several volumes the size of an airport paperback. I'd buy a box full of them to hand out. We need to defeat the folly of the left today.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Leaping Buck
Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:58 PM
"Intellectuals" still think "Socialism is better" in spite of 70 years of emperical evidence, they are the true book burners and anti intellectuals, they never let facts & history get in the way of their agenda.
Comment: #9
Posted by: SmittyLA
Wed Nov 12, 2008 8:59 PM
Re: Jason...Sir;.. What a crappy piece of nonsense you write... But about par for this course... The left has no monopoly on truth, and neither does the right... The real problem here is that left or right intellectuals believe in books, in the plural, and most of the right believes in only one book: The Bible, which compared to itself is a pack of lies, and a text book of human vice and failing... And that is why the Catholics never preached the Bible, because it is an infernal can of worms that not even the two best mind on the planet could ever take the same lesson from... It is devisive, and turns brother against brother, father against son... So, don't tell me as a republican that you got the truth in your pocket...We both know you are playing with something else... And, if I may be so bold; Only as an abstraction is the truth an absolute... In all other respects the truth is not an absolute form, but a form of relationship, that we work out together as in every other form of relationship... Sometimes intellectuals help with working out the truth, but even the most ignorant person on the planet has a sense of truth that cannot be denied in the life he carries around on his feet... If truth does not serve his life, he dies, and this truth is true for each of us; so you tell me why any some one should buy your version of truth -if it kills them, as republicanism and christianity has done to so many???.Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #10
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 13, 2008 5:37 AM
Re: SmittyLA;...Sir, the proof for social-ism is found in pre-history, which is the very place where democracy is proved... It is not because an equality economy does not work, as an ideal, as a form created from an idea of perfection- that disproves it as a real form of relationship... In fact, all examples of reality created out of ideals of perfection fall short... You cannot build the perfect house from an idea of the prefect house, let alone a perfect society... It is what works in societies that is the true standard of perfection...Capitalism as an ism is supposed to work, and the fact does not... Look at who is funding our government....It is failed socialists... But we all came out of socialism as fact, and even your family was such, as is much in society still.... We have the poor examples of socialism in our lives to allow the great masses of wealth in private hands... Were we not willing to share a common poverty the great wealth of the rich would be history... So don't say socialism does not work... And don't say democracy; which is political equality -does not work, because we have never had it to work...The survival of every person in humanity is the result of socialism before it ever carried the name... It is capitalism that has never been tried to success...And such success as capitalism has known, again, has been made possible by wide spread socialism... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #11
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 13, 2008 6:42 AM
Re: Hazmatwa;... Sir... You know, you sort of contradict yourself... You say you are a PHD. Chemist, and that they too are PHDs... Yet you judge that they do not know other than their area of expertise... How can you judge them wrong unless you judge yourself right on no more knowledge outside of your strength than they??? I want to tell you something... My Godfather and uncle, God bless his soul, was a PHD, and I am nothing...I mean, I am uneducated..Now this smart uncle of mine worked his way through college, and even helped set up the Cyclotron at MSU, where he was the head of the nat Sci department for some years... Now, I love to read, and in fact, reading has been the bulk of my education... And, I have read enough to have respect for any sort of PHD, including yourself... But to make a point, my uncle read novels, spy novels, and since he did some work for the government I had to wonder if he was not paid to....And that always handed me a hoot because I read fiction by the wheel barrow when young, but now can read only non fiction, you know, philosophy, law, history, soft sciences, some physics. ..Still, for the focus of his education, he was not at all blind to the rest of the world, and perhaps your partners in crime are not either...You do not have to be so well educated to see Mr. Bush was screwing up most handily... But the contempt of the republicans generally for the intelligent plays upon the greatest possible injustice to many of us, -that education is too expensive to pursue... Some people act like it is a choice; and that they choose faith rather than knowledge... It is not a choice... People choose faith out of ignorance the way other people choose knowledge out of understanding... You must have a little seed to grow a large crop... Some people are denied the seed of knowledge, and so they hate the intellectual....Don't you suppose, sir, that I would that I were educated, and that some diplomas marked my progress??? It would be nice to present my ideas to people with a resume, and be able to say: Now, take me seriously, for I be edgifide.. The thing is, sir, that we all have something to offer, and we all have a portion of the truth, and it does no good to slam the intellectual when his eyes may work as well as your own... I can honest to God think of many more moral weaknesses than education... I wouldn't mind that weakness myself... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #12
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Thu Nov 13, 2008 8:26 PM
I loved your essay. It brought a few things to mind that prove your point.
1. I didn't go to college......not because it was not an aspiration or because I wasn't capable, (my father graduated summa cum laude from Princeton, and I was Ivy league bound) so it had been an aspiration all my life. Circumstances at that time in my life made it impossible.
2. In an attempt to make up for this loss I educated myself. (Today I am more conversant and well read than most of my colllege grad. friends.- many have told me that I am the only true "intellectual" that they know. I think for myself.)
3. I was not indoctrinated .. I wasn't put in that position......therefore I think radically different from my peers who are college grads.
4. I had a great art teacher when I was in my early 20's.....a great artist, world renowned. He insisted that 1 year of his teaching was all he would give to me......for fear that I would lose my individuality if I didn't go out on my own at that time.
I'm not sure if these remarks belong here......but I felt that my personal experience underlines your theory.
After my father died I became the family figurehead.......within three months we had accomplished things under my direction that my father had been incapable of accomplishing.....and I was 18 years old.
I oft times think that if I had children of my own, I would not push for college unless they were going into science or engineering.
Is it any wonder that I am the only conservative in a very large family?
Comment: #13
Posted by: diogenes
Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:36 PM
Re: diogenes; Sir.... It was for children that I gave up education, but no one will ever say that children are not a form of education who has once had them...Just two things; I have known educated people, and have had some slight education, and for speed, and the mass production of education, there is nothing like universities... I mean, the point Mr. Sowell makes, that educated idiots are not better than uneducated, is true enough... The statement about being ruled out of the phone book is false, because democracy should not be rule by any number, but is government by all the numbers... Self government is not majority or minority rule...Now, I might have traded my work for an education, that is, bought my education on credit, and then labored in my field of study to the finish off my days... Instead, I supported my family with manual labor, and I do mean manual and labor... I was a beast of burden... I kept my mind and worked with my body... But If I had not had intellectual thought to occupy my mind while often doing mindless tasks, I might have died of boredom, literally, because at the height I worked, boredom might have cause carelessness, and that is deadly... Now, if you read me, you will see many careless mistakes, and forgive me if I still must hit and run to post.... But I never made a careless mistake when a life depended upon it, and I often dwelled upon a single phrase of a philosopher for an entire day so that my first steps led me to a book at home... Now, my little education is the pride of my old age, and my treasure; and I prize the company of educated people who are so nice and forward thinking, and alert... As an Ironworker I sometimes had to work around trippers, and from my perspective 99% of the government wouldn't last ten minutes on a construction site before being run off... It is not brains that are running this country, but money, -some abstract concept of self interest with dead presidents imprinted on them... For example, not one Supreme court justice is less than a millionaire, and some are multi millionaires... If I worry about my pennies is it possible they will not worry for their millions??? Our government is not democracy, and the difference is that when each person has the protection of the other, and each decides his best interest according to his needs then he gets his needs met, or is not bothered to meet them himself... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #14
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:03 AM
Re: jacqueline h. simonds;..Ma'am, Tom, as you call him, is not meanspirited... That is just the way people sound when they have their heads stuck in their horns...Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #15
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Nov 14, 2008 6:08 AM
Here's the deal, Sowell. Look around you. Do you think the deterioration of American education is producing the good life here? Do you think the war on evolution is what made this country great? You had better start getting a little pissed off when presidential candidates deliberately and proudly mispronounce words like "nuclear" as if they are scoring the ultimate victory against the pointy heads. Tell your party boys they need to learn how to sound out the word correctly and have a little respect for what good education and intellectualism have accomplished for us, or your grandkids will be going to classrooms where their lessons are taught in Chinese.
Comment: #16
Posted by: Masako
Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:46 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

31 Aug 2010 The Passing of E-6

18 Aug 2009 Whose Medical Decisions?: Part III

13 Sep 2011 Back to the Future: Part II