creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
9 Dec 2014
Is Law Optional?

The fiasco of "Rolling Stone" magazine's apology for an unsubstantiated claim of gang rape at a University of … Read More.

9 Dec 2014
Christmas Books

This year, Christmas shopping may be an especially welcome respite from the ugly events going on across the country,… Read More.

2 Dec 2014
Opinions Versus Facts

Everyone seems to have an opinion about the tragic events in Ferguson, Missouri. But, as Daniel Patrick … Read More.

Tortured Reasoning

Comment

Critics and defenders of the harsh interrogation methods applied to captured terrorists can argue forever over whether those methods were "torture." But any serious discussion of a serious issue — and surely terrorism qualifies as serious — has to move beyond semantics and confront the ultimate question: "Compared to what alternative?"

If you knew that there was a hidden nuclear time bomb planted somewhere in New York City — set to go off today — and you had a captured terrorist who knew where and when, would you not do anything whatever to make him tell you where and when? Would you pause to look up the definition of "torture"? Would you even care what the definition of "torture" was, when the alternative was seeing millions of innocent people murdered?

Senator Dianne Feinstein's recent release of a massive report on the CIA's severe interrogation methods, used against captured Islamic terrorists, has set off a firestorm of controversy. It is hard to see what benefit the United States of America gains from releasing that report. But it is painfully obvious what lasting damage has been done to the security of Americans.

One of the most obscene acts of the Obama administration, when it first took office, was to launch a criminal investigation of CIA agents who had used harsh interrogation methods against captured terrorists in the wake of the devastating September 11, 2001 aerial attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Right after those terrorist attacks, when there were desperate fears of what might be coming next, these CIA agents were trying to spare fellow Americans another attack that could take thousands more lives, or perhaps millions more. To turn on these agents, years later, after they did what they were urged to do, as a patriotic duty in a time of crisis, is both a betrayal of those who acted in the past and a disincentive to those in the future who are charged with safeguarding the nation.

Other nations, whose cooperation we need, in order to disrupt international terrorist networks, see how their involvement has now been revealed to the whole world — including terrorists — because supposedly responsible American officials, in the Congress of the United States, cannot keep their mouths shut.

The public's "right to know" has often been invoked to justify publicizing confidential information.

But is there any evidence that the American public was clamoring to learn state secrets, which every government has? I don't know where our nuclear weapons are located and I don't want to know, certainly not at the cost of letting our enemies know.

The ease with which politicians are willing to pull the rug out from under people whose job is to safeguard our lives — whether they are CIA agents, the police or the military — is not only a betrayal of those people but a danger to us all.

People who are constantly denouncing the police, including with demonstrable lies, may think they are showing solidarity with people in the ghettos. But, when police hesitate to go beyond "kinder and gentler" policing, that leaves decent people in black communities at the mercy of hoodlums and thugs who have no mercy.

When conscientious young people, of any race, who would like to help maintain peace and order see that being a policeman means having race hustlers constantly whipping up mob hostility against you — and having opportunistic politicians and the media joining the race hustlers — those young people may well decide that some other line of work would be better for them.

High crime areas need not only the most, but the best, police they can get. Taking cheap shots at cops is not the way to get the people who are needed.

When people who volunteer to put their lives on the line in the military to defend this country, at home and abroad, see their buddies killed on the battlefield, and sometimes themselves come back minus an arm or a leg, or with severe physical and mental damage that they may never get over — and then see some headstrong politician in the White House throw away everything they fought for, and see enemy forces take back places for which Americans shed their blood, that can be galling to them and a deterrent to others who might otherwise take their place in the future.

If we cannot see beyond the moment today, we will pay dearly tomorrow and in many more tomorrows.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2014 CREATORS.COM



Comments

12 Comments | Post Comment
I can't believe I'm about to disagree with the great Thomas Sowell, but I do. At least on the torture issue. If torture was the only option to stop a nuclear bomb from going off, like in the series 24, thats one scenario. But thats not what the torture report was about. The report was about having the government having a policy, in writting, that its ok to torture people. No bomb, no time limit or any other mitigating circumstances. Thats so much different from, say, a local CIA head making the field call to torture someone. Furthermore, what if in the future, one of our soldiers is held and tortured. We just lost the moral high ground to condemn that act, cause we do it too. We, as a superpower, set the standard for a lot of these issues that other counties will follow too. We need to make them high standards and not lose our values as a nation.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Dec 15, 2014 11:34 AM
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mark
Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:20 PM
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mark
Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:25 PM
Comment: #4
Posted by: Mark
Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:26 PM
Comment: #5
Posted by: Mark
Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:26 PM
Comment: #6
Posted by: Mark
Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:12 PM
Comment: #7
Posted by: Mark
Tue Dec 16, 2014 7:22 AM
Who thinks that jihadists respect or are influenced by our moral high ground? Pathological sanctimoniousness. Thank God, literally, that Leftists were not in charge after 9/11!
Comment: #8
Posted by: BeckyJane
Tue Dec 16, 2014 9:19 AM
Agree 100% with Thomas Sowells well written article! This kind of thinking is what it is going to take to get America back on its feet...
Comment: #9
Posted by: Jean crawford
Tue Dec 16, 2014 11:24 AM
Comment: #10
Posted by: Mark
Tue Dec 16, 2014 7:01 PM
Re: Chris McCoy
Chris, if I had to guess, I'd believe you are an elite college junior majoring in political science (read: progressive liberalism) to hold your opinion, probably not even your own. Certainly you've never served in the military or in any law enforcement service. It's your kind of naivite and pusillanimity that has made us a nation of wusses, unable to take any forceful action even to defend our country. You belong to the party of "relativity," right? Flexible values and principles as long as you are not inconvenienced, and then you'll take your chances with whatever regime comes along as you're not harmed or deprived of your (white) privileges. No blood on your hands even if the fate of thousands or millions would be at stake. You need to man up -- grow some cojones -- figure out what you'd die for or what you'd defend. Millions have fought or died for your right to be a coward, and we're not giving up or taking any crap from the likes of you. Consider what our brutal adversaries do routinely all the time, even if it doesn't affect you personally. Don't give me that BS about "moral equivalency" -- that's the cop-out of weaklings and losers.
Comment: #11
Posted by: Derel Schrock
Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:23 PM
Derek you are totally wrong about me. I never went to a liberal brainwashing college and I did serve in the military. I simply don't trust our government with this kind of power. The current admisistration has taken lying and abuse of power to a staggering level. They've given themselves the power to arrest any US citizen for no reason at all and hold them as long as they want. They've raided houses of people who have done nothing wrong. Now you want to give them the ok to torture people? This isen't about being a "pussy", its about distrusting a government that has no accountability and is totally out of control.
And religion and values do play a part in this. We are a nation built on Christain values weather liberals like it or not. We need to stay true to that. Who would Jesus torture? Or drone strike? Or invade under false pretense? We need to be the better nation and set a standard for the rest of the world to act. Not for our enemies, but for our allies and partners.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:34 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Dec. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
30 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 22 Dec 2014
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 21 Dec 2014
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 21 Dec 2014

24 Feb 2009 A Fatal Trajectory

2 Feb 2010 Politicians in Wonderland

9 Jul 2013 Who Is Racist?