creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
23 Jun 2015
Hillary and History

There are no sure things in politics, but Hillary Clinton is the closest thing to a sure thing to become the Democrats'… Read More.

16 Jun 2015
Micro-totalitarianism

The political left has come up with a new buzzword: "micro-aggression." Professors at the University of … Read More.

9 Jun 2015
Who Lost Iraq?

After the pro-Western government of China was forced to flee to the island of Taiwan in 1949, when the … Read More.

Supreme Court Disasters

Comment

Many people are looking at the recent Supreme Court decisions about ObamaCare and same-sex marriage in terms of whether they think these are good or bad policies. That is certainly a legitimate concern, for both those who favor those policies and those who oppose them.

But there is a deeper and more long-lasting impact of these decisions that raise the question whether we are still living in America, where "we the people" are supposed to decide what kind of society we want, not have our betters impose their notions on us.

The Constitution of the United States says that the federal government has only those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution — and that all other powers belong either to the states or to the people themselves.

That is the foundation of our freedom, and that is what is being dismantled by both this year's Obamacare decision and last year's ObamaCare decision, as well as by the Supreme Court's decision imposing a redefinition of marriage.

Last year's Supreme Court decision declaring ObamaCare constitutional says that the federal government can order individual citizens to buy the kind of insurance the government wants them to buy, regardless of what the citizens themselves prefer.

The Constitution gave the federal government no such power, but the Supreme Court did. It did so by citing the government's power to tax, even though the ObamaCare law did not claim to be taxing.

This year's ObamaCare decision likewise ignored the actual words of the law, and decided that the decisions of 34 states not to participate in ObamaCare Exchanges, even to get federal subsidies, would not prevent those federal subsidies to be paid anyway, to Exchanges up by the federal government itself.

When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, "we the people" are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our "public servants" are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words.

This decision makes next year's choice of the next President of the United States more crucial than ever, because with that office goes the power to nominate justices of the Supreme Court.

Democrats have consistently nominated people who shared their social vision and imposed their policy preferences, too often in disregard of the Constitution.

Republicans have complained about it but, when the power of judicial appointment was in the hands of Republican presidents, they have too often appointed justices who participated in the dismantling of the Constitution — and usually for the kinds of social policies preferred by Democrats.

Chief Justices appointed by Republican presidents have made landmark decisions for which there was neither Constitutional authority nor either evidence or logic. The first was Earl Warren.

When Chief Justice Warren said that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," he was within walking distance of an all-black public high school that sent a higher percentage of its graduates on to college than any white public high school in Washington. As far back as 1899, that school's students scored higher on tests than two of the city's three white academic public high schools.

Nevertheless, Chief Justice Warren's unsubstantiated assumption led to years of school busing across the country that was as racially divisive as it was educationally futile.

Chief Justice Warren Burger, also appointed by a Republican president, gave us the "disparate impact" notion that statistical disparities imply discrimination. That notion has created a whole statistical shakedown racket, practiced by government itself and by private race hustlers alike.

And now Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by George W. Bush, gives the federal government the power to order us to buy whatever insurance they want us to buy. With that entering wedge, is there anything they cannot force us to do, regardless of the Constitution?

Can the Republicans — or the country — afford to put another mushy moderate in the White House, who can appoint more mushy moderates to the Supreme Court?

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2015 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
I think the time for moderates is over. Politics is just going to get more and more polarizing
Comment: #1
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Tue Jun 30, 2015 7:46 AM
Busing kids away from their 'home' schools was a gross misinterpretation of what Justice Warren meant. What he was saying was that populating schools along racial lines was unconstitutional. His ruling was not to forcibly integrate schools but to stop preventing blacks or other minorities from being kept out of schools to which they should, geographically, attend.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Eric Wixom
Tue Jun 30, 2015 2:01 PM
I agree with the article with the exception of the following:

"This decision makes next year's choice of the next President of the United States more crucial than ever, because with that office goes the power to nominate justices of the Supreme Court."

Makes no difference if one votes for Democrats or Republicans - they are the same they just pretend to have different goals. Consider the Republican Congress - Obama is getting more done now than when Harry Reid was in control.

Republicans are losers - whinny, wussy, lying losers - and the Republican party needs to go away so a conservative party can be born.

Americans do not understand or appreciate how rare our free market economy backed up by a government founded in morality is now and thorough the history of humans. All the world owes most of its current standard of living to the USA which is not even 300 years old.

Further, if one wishes to live in SHlT and PlSS and be ruled by tyrants in the name of socialism one can go just about anywhere in the world and have a great time. But if one wishes to live free America was one's best hope. Those days are gone.
Comment: #3
Posted by: SusansMirror
Tue Jun 30, 2015 5:14 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Thomas Sowell
Jun. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Star ParkerUpdated 1 Jul 2015
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 1 Jul 2015
Jacob Sullum
Jacob SullumUpdated 1 Jul 2015

10 May 2011 The 'Education' Mantra

20 Feb 2014 The Lesson of Dunkirk

13 Mar 2007 "Supporting the Troops"