opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Thomas Sowell
Thomas Sowell
19 Aug 2015
Immigration Excuses

One of the most lame excuses for doing nothing is that we can't do everything. Such excuses have been … Read More.

18 Aug 2015
Random Thoughts

Random thoughts on the passing scene: Stupid people can cause problems, but it usually takes brilliant people … Read More.

11 Aug 2015
A Debatable 'Debate'

The so-called "debates," among too many Republicans to have a debate, are yet another painful sign of how … Read More.

Sorting the Candidates


Despite a nuclear Iran looming on the horizon, the media seem to be putting most of their attention on two candidates for their respective parties' presidential nominations next year. Moreover, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump each make their own party nervous.

If next year's election comes down to Clinton versus Trump, a lot of people may simply stay home in disgust.

When we are this far away from the official start of the primary election season, we can usually just say, "It's still early days." Many a front runner this early in the process ended up out of the running by the time the party conventions were held, and totally forgotten by election day.

That is the way it usually is. But that is not likely to be the way it will be this time.

This is Hillary Clinton's last hurrah. It is now or never for her. And the Democrats have nobody comparable as a vote-getter to put in her place.

Even if an investigation finds Mrs. Clinton found guilty of violating the law in the way she handled e-mails when she was Secretary of State, the Obama administration is not likely to prosecute her. And President Obama can always pardon her, so that the next administration cannot prosecute her either. So Hillary doesn't even have to take a plea bargain.

Someone with a sense of shame might well withdraw from the contest for the Democratic Party's nomination, now that public opinion polls show that most people distrust her. But since when have the Clintons ever had a sense of shame?

On the Republican side, former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich has pointed out that if Donald Trump can continue to get 20 or 25 percent of the Republican voters on his side, he can build up a formidable lead of delegates in winner-take-all primaries.

It will not matter if 60 percent of the Republican voters turn against him, if that 60 percent is split up among all the other Republican candidates, with none of those candidates getting more votes than Trump.

Sometimes financial backers can withdraw their support and force a stubborn candidate to drop out of the race.

But Trump has enough money of his own to stay in the race as long as he wants to, even if that ruins the Republicans' chances of winning the 2016 elections.

Ironically, the Republicans have a much stronger set of presidential candidates than usual to choose from this year. But the media obsession with Trump means that even the best of these candidates are not likely to get enough exposure for most voters to get to know much about them.

Governors with superb records — such as Bobby Jindal in Louisiana and Scott Walker in Wisconsin — may not have much name recognition on the national scene. And certainly the little sound bites in the so-called "debates" are not likely to tell the voters much.

This is not just the candidates' problem. With this country facing historic dangers, both internally and internationally, we urgently need to find someone with depth, insight and courage as the next President of the United States.

But, with the media obsessed with Donald Trump's show biz talents and persona — and covering everything he says, does or might do, 24/7 — how are the voters to sort through the large number of Republican candidates to find a couple that are worth getting to know more thoroughly?

It will be like trying to find a needle in a haystack. And never was finding that needle, the right leader, more important for the nation.

Internally, we are so polarized over immigration that our current "leaders" have left our borders wide open to terrorists from around the world, rather than take the political risks of offending voters on one side of this issue or offending voters on the opposite side. Instead, they risk American lives by their inaction.

Internationally, our "leaders" have written a blank check for our most dangerous and fanatical enemy — Iran — to get both nuclear bombs and the missiles to deliver them. And the Obama administration, with a track record of huge shameless lies, offers us its reassurances.

We had better find that needle in a haystack, someone who can salvage a desperate situation. Flamboyant rhetoric is not enough.

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



6 Comments | Post Comment
Comment: #1
Posted by: SusansMirror
Mon Aug 24, 2015 4:17 PM
Comment: #2
Posted by: SusansMirror
Mon Aug 24, 2015 4:20 PM
Don't be speechless, Susan, speak up!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Derel Schrock
Tue Aug 25, 2015 6:04 AM
We'll see. Sowell is right of course. Rush and others indicate Trump is shattering the PC rhetoric. Carson echoes his sentiments, and so do others. Not many others though...and that is what we need, is less PC.
With the PC out of the way we can hope one of our 17 candidates becomes our next much needed Reaganite.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Andrew Zimmerman
Tue Aug 25, 2015 7:37 AM
I am not allowed to post an opinion on this site for some reason unless it is less than 5 lines long.
Comment: #5
Posted by: SusansMirror
Thu Aug 27, 2015 4:27 PM
As an economist, Sowell has been someone I follow and respect for his excellent work inside of tabulating economic data and illustrating the myths inside of pathos economics. With that said, this article seemed to be completely on point; until we reached the point where Sowell repeats an unsubstantiated claim about "OUR" so called 'enemy'. A very profound claim to make, you would expect it to not be completely devoid of any reason, evidence, or logos once soever. On what basis does Sowell declare the people of one nation to be enemies of himself?
Comment: #6
Posted by: Brian Hynes
Fri Aug 28, 2015 8:35 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Thomas Sowell
Aug. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 31 Aug 2015
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 30 Aug 2015
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 29 Aug 2015

1 Nov 2011 Democracy Versus Mob Rule

21 Dec 2010 Random Thoughts

2 Oct 2007 What Is Intelligence?